148,908 research outputs found
Type-driven semantic interpretation and feature dependencies in R-LFG
Once one has enriched LFG's formal machinery with the linear logic mechanisms
needed for semantic interpretation as proposed by Dalrymple et. al., it is
natural to ask whether these make any existing components of LFG redundant. As
Dalrymple and her colleagues note, LFG's f-structure completeness and coherence
constraints fall out as a by-product of the linear logic machinery they propose
for semantic interpretation, thus making those f-structure mechanisms
redundant. Given that linear logic machinery or something like it is
independently needed for semantic interpretation, it seems reasonable to
explore the extent to which it is capable of handling feature structure
constraints as well.
R-LFG represents the extreme position that all linguistically required
feature structure dependencies can be captured by the resource-accounting
machinery of a linear or similiar logic independently needed for semantic
interpretation, making LFG's unification machinery redundant. The goal is to
show that LFG linguistic analyses can be expressed as clearly and perspicuously
using the smaller set of mechanisms of R-LFG as they can using the much larger
set of unification-based mechanisms in LFG: if this is the case then we will
have shown that positing these extra f-structure mechanisms is not
linguistically warranted.Comment: 30 pages, to appear in the the ``Glue Language'' volume edited by
Dalrymple, uses tree-dvips, ipa, epic, eepic, fullnam
An epistemic model of an agent who does not reflect on reasoning processes
This paper introduces an epistemic model of a boundedly rational agent under the two assumptions that (i) the agent's reasoning process is in accordance with the model but (ii) the agent does not reflect on these reasoning processes. For such a concept of bounded rationality a semantic interpretation by the possible world semantics of the Kripke (1963) type is no longer available because the definition of knowledge in these possible world semantics implies that the agent knows all valid statements of the model. Key to my alternative semantic approach is the extension of the method of truth tables, first introduced for the propositional logic by Wittgenstein (1922), to an epistemic logic so that I can determine the truth value of epistemic statements for all relevant truth conditions. I also define an axiom system plus inference rules for knowledge- and unawareness statements whereby I drop the inference rule of necessitation, which claims that an agent knows all theorems of the logic. As my main formal result I derive a determination theorem linking my semantic with my syntactic approach.Bounded Rationality, Knowledge, Unawareness, Epistemic Logic, Semantic Interpretation, Iterative Solution Concepts for Strategic Games
Two for the Price of One: Lifting Separation Logic Assertions
Recently, data abstraction has been studied in the context of separation
logic, with noticeable practical successes: the developed logics have enabled
clean proofs of tricky challenging programs, such as subject-observer patterns,
and they have become the basis of efficient verification tools for Java
(jStar), C (VeriFast) and Hoare Type Theory (Ynot). In this paper, we give a
new semantic analysis of such logic-based approaches using Reynolds's
relational parametricity. The core of the analysis is our lifting theorems,
which give a sound and complete condition for when a true implication between
assertions in the standard interpretation entails that the same implication
holds in a relational interpretation. Using these theorems, we provide an
algorithm for identifying abstraction-respecting client-side proofs; the proofs
ensure that clients cannot distinguish two appropriately-related module
implementations
The relational model is injective for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings)
We show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings)
the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs induced by cut-elimination
coincides with the semantic equivalence relation on proofs induced by the
multiset based relational model: one says that the interpretation in the model
(or the semantics) is injective. We actually prove a stronger result: two
cut-free proofs of the full multiplicative and exponential fragment of linear
logic whose interpretations coincide in the multiset based relational model are
the same "up to the connections between the doors of exponential boxes".Comment: 36 page
- …