3,767 research outputs found
Progress in AI Planning Research and Applications
Planning has made significant progress since its inception in the 1970s, in terms both of the efficiency and sophistication of its algorithms and representations and its potential for application to real problems. In this paper we sketch the foundations of planning as a sub-field of Artificial Intelligence and the history of its development over the past three decades. Then some of the recent achievements within the field are discussed and provided some experimental data demonstrating the progress that has been made in the application of general planners to realistic and complex problems. The paper concludes by identifying some of the open issues that remain as important challenges for future research in planning
Extending classical planning with state constraints: Heuristics and search for optimal planning
We present a principled way of extending a classical AI planning formalism with systems of state constraints, which relate - sometimes determine - the values of variables in each state traversed by the plan. This extension occupies an attractive middle ground between expressivity and complexity. It enables modelling a new range of problems, as well as formulating more efficient models of classical planning problems. An example of the former is planning-based control of networked physical systems - power networks, for example - in which a local, discrete control action can have global effects on continuous quantities, such as altering flows across the entire network. At the same time, our extension remains decidable as long as the satisfiability of sets of state constraints is decidable, including in the presence of numeric state variables, and we demonstrate that effective techniques for cost-optimal planning known in the classical setting - in particular, relaxation-based admissible heuristics - can be adapted to the extended formalism. In this paper, we apply our approach to constraints in the form of linear or non-linear equations over numeric state variables, but the approach is independent of the type of state constraints, as long as there exists a procedure that decides their consistency. The planner and the constraint solver interact through a well-defined, narrow interface, in which the solver requires no specialisation to the planning contextThis work was supported by ARC project DP140104219, āRobust AI Planning for Hybrid Systemsā, and in part by ARO grant W911NF1210471 and ONR grant N000141210430
Automated sequence and motion planning for robotic spatial extrusion of 3D trusses
While robotic spatial extrusion has demonstrated a new and efficient means to
fabricate 3D truss structures in architectural scale, a major challenge remains
in automatically planning extrusion sequence and robotic motion for trusses
with unconstrained topologies. This paper presents the first attempt in the
field to rigorously formulate the extrusion sequence and motion planning (SAMP)
problem, using a CSP encoding. Furthermore, this research proposes a new
hierarchical planning framework to solve the extrusion SAMP problems that
usually have a long planning horizon and 3D configuration complexity. By
decoupling sequence and motion planning, the planning framework is able to
efficiently solve the extrusion sequence, end-effector poses, joint
configurations, and transition trajectories for spatial trusses with
nonstandard topologies. This paper also presents the first detailed computation
data to reveal the runtime bottleneck on solving SAMP problems, which provides
insight and comparing baseline for future algorithmic development. Together
with the algorithmic results, this paper also presents an open-source and
modularized software implementation called Choreo that is machine-agnostic. To
demonstrate the power of this algorithmic framework, three case studies,
including real fabrication and simulation results, are presented.Comment: 24 pages, 16 figure
On the Minimal Revision Problem of Specification Automata
As robots are being integrated into our daily lives, it becomes necessary to
provide guarantees on the safe and provably correct operation. Such guarantees
can be provided using automata theoretic task and mission planning where the
requirements are expressed as temporal logic specifications. However, in
real-life scenarios, it is to be expected that not all user task requirements
can be realized by the robot. In such cases, the robot must provide feedback to
the user on why it cannot accomplish a given task. Moreover, the robot should
indicate what tasks it can accomplish which are as "close" as possible to the
initial user intent. This paper establishes that the latter problem, which is
referred to as the minimal specification revision problem, is NP complete. A
heuristic algorithm is presented that can compute good approximations to the
Minimal Revision Problem (MRP) in polynomial time. The experimental study of
the algorithm demonstrates that in most problem instances the heuristic
algorithm actually returns the optimal solution. Finally, some cases where the
algorithm does not return the optimal solution are presented.Comment: 23 pages, 16 figures, 2 tables, International Joural of Robotics
Research 2014 Major Revision (submitted
Optimal Planning with State Constraints
In the classical planning model, state variables are assigned
values in the initial state and remain unchanged unless
explicitly affected by action effects. However, some properties
of states are more naturally modelled not as direct effects of
actions but instead as derived, in each state, from the primary
variables via a set of rules. We refer to those rules as state
constraints. The two types of state constraints that will be
discussed here are numeric state constraints and logical rules
that we will refer to as axioms.
When using state constraints we make a distinction between
primary variables, whose values are directly affected by action
effects, and secondary variables, whose values are determined by
state constraints. While primary variables have finite and
discrete domains, as in classical planning, there is no such
requirement for secondary variables. For example, using numeric
state constraints allows us to have secondary variables whose
values are real numbers. We show that state constraints are a
construct that lets us combine classical planning methods with
specialised solvers developed for other types of problems. For
example, introducing numeric state constraints enables us to
apply planning techniques in domains involving interconnected
physical systems, such as power networks.
To solve these types of problems optimally, we adapt commonly
used methods from optimal classical planning, namely state-space
search guided by admissible heuristics. In heuristics based on
monotonic relaxation, the idea is that in a relaxed state each
variable assumes a set of values instead of just a single value.
With state constraints, the challenge becomes to evaluate the
conditions, such as goals and action preconditions, that involve
secondary variables. We employ consistency checking tools to
evaluate whether these conditions are satisfied in the relaxed
state. In our work with numerical constraints we use linear
programming, while with axioms we use answer set programming and
three value semantics. This allows us to build a relaxed planning
graph and compute constraint-aware version of heuristics based on
monotonic relaxation.
We also adapt pattern database heuristics. We notice that an
abstract state can be thought of as a state in the monotonic
relaxation in which the variables in the pattern hold only one
value, while the variables not in the pattern simultaneously hold
all the values in their domains. This means that we can apply the
same technique for evaluating conditions on secondary variables
as we did for the monotonic relaxation and build pattern
databases similarly as it is done in classical planning.
To make better use of our heuristics, we modify the A* algorithm
by combining two techniques that were previously used
independently ā partial expansion and preferred operators. Our
modified algorithm, which we call PrefPEA, is most beneficial in
cases where heuristic is expensive to compute, but accurate, and
states have many successors
Solving Factored MDPs with Hybrid State and Action Variables
Efficient representations and solutions for large decision problems with
continuous and discrete variables are among the most important challenges faced
by the designers of automated decision support systems. In this paper, we
describe a novel hybrid factored Markov decision process (MDP) model that
allows for a compact representation of these problems, and a new hybrid
approximate linear programming (HALP) framework that permits their efficient
solutions. The central idea of HALP is to approximate the optimal value
function by a linear combination of basis functions and optimize its weights by
linear programming. We analyze both theoretical and computational aspects of
this approach, and demonstrate its scale-up potential on several hybrid
optimization problems
Short Term Unit Commitment as a Planning Problem
āUnit Commitmentā, setting online schedules for generating units in a power system to ensure supply meets demand, is integral to the secure, efficient, and economic daily operation of a power system. Conflicting desires for security of supply at minimum cost complicate this. Sustained research has produced methodologies within a guaranteed bound of optimality, given sufficient computing time.
Regulatory requirements to reduce emissions in modern power systems have necessitated increased renewable generation, whose output cannot be directly controlled, increasing complex uncertainties. Traditional methods are thus less efficient, generating more costly schedules or requiring impractical increases in solution time.
Meta-Heuristic approaches are studied to identify why this large body of work has had little industrial impact despite continued academic interest over many years. A discussion of lessons learned is given, and should be of interest to researchers presenting new Unit Commitment approaches, such as a Planning implementation.
Automated Planning is a sub-field of Artificial Intelligence, where a timestamped sequence of predefined actions manipulating a system towards a goal configuration is sought. This differs from previous Unit Commitment formulations found in the literature. There are fewer times when a unitās online status switches, representing a Planning action, than free variables in a traditional formulation. Efficient reasoning about these actions could reduce solution time, enabling Planning to tackle Unit Commitment problems with high levels of renewable generation.
Existing Planning formulations for Unit Commitment have not been found. A successful formulation enumerating open challenges would constitute a good benchmark problem for the field. Thus, two models are presented. The first demonstrates the approachās strength in temporal reasoning over numeric optimisation. The second balances this but current algorithms cannot handle it. Extensions to an existing algorithm are proposed alongside a discussion of immediate challenges and possible solutions. This is intended to form a base from which a successful methodology can be developed
Taming Numbers and Durations in the Model Checking Integrated Planning System
The Model Checking Integrated Planning System (MIPS) is a temporal least
commitment heuristic search planner based on a flexible object-oriented
workbench architecture. Its design clearly separates explicit and symbolic
directed exploration algorithms from the set of on-line and off-line computed
estimates and associated data structures. MIPS has shown distinguished
performance in the last two international planning competitions. In the last
event the description language was extended from pure propositional planning to
include numerical state variables, action durations, and plan quality objective
functions. Plans were no longer sequences of actions but time-stamped
schedules. As a participant of the fully automated track of the competition,
MIPS has proven to be a general system; in each track and every benchmark
domain it efficiently computed plans of remarkable quality. This article
introduces and analyzes the most important algorithmic novelties that were
necessary to tackle the new layers of expressiveness in the benchmark problems
and to achieve a high level of performance. The extensions include critical
path analysis of sequentially generated plans to generate corresponding optimal
parallel plans. The linear time algorithm to compute the parallel plan bypasses
known NP hardness results for partial ordering by scheduling plans with respect
to the set of actions and the imposed precedence relations. The efficiency of
this algorithm also allows us to improve the exploration guidance: for each
encountered planning state the corresponding approximate sequential plan is
scheduled. One major strength of MIPS is its static analysis phase that grounds
and simplifies parameterized predicates, functions and operators, that infers
knowledge to minimize the state description length, and that detects domain
object symmetries. The latter aspect is analyzed in detail. MIPS has been
developed to serve as a complete and optimal state space planner, with
admissible estimates, exploration engines and branching cuts. In the
competition version, however, certain performance compromises had to be made,
including floating point arithmetic, weighted heuristic search exploration
according to an inadmissible estimate and parameterized optimization
- ā¦