1,220 research outputs found
A Generalised Quantifier Theory of Natural Language in Categorical Compositional Distributional Semantics with Bialgebras
Categorical compositional distributional semantics is a model of natural
language; it combines the statistical vector space models of words with the
compositional models of grammar. We formalise in this model the generalised
quantifier theory of natural language, due to Barwise and Cooper. The
underlying setting is a compact closed category with bialgebras. We start from
a generative grammar formalisation and develop an abstract categorical
compositional semantics for it, then instantiate the abstract setting to sets
and relations and to finite dimensional vector spaces and linear maps. We prove
the equivalence of the relational instantiation to the truth theoretic
semantics of generalised quantifiers. The vector space instantiation formalises
the statistical usages of words and enables us to, for the first time, reason
about quantified phrases and sentences compositionally in distributional
semantics
Comparing and evaluating extended Lambek calculi
Lambeks Syntactic Calculus, commonly referred to as the Lambek calculus, was
innovative in many ways, notably as a precursor of linear logic. But it also
showed that we could treat our grammatical framework as a logic (as opposed to
a logical theory). However, though it was successful in giving at least a basic
treatment of many linguistic phenomena, it was also clear that a slightly more
expressive logical calculus was needed for many other cases. Therefore, many
extensions and variants of the Lambek calculus have been proposed, since the
eighties and up until the present day. As a result, there is now a large class
of calculi, each with its own empirical successes and theoretical results, but
also each with its own logical primitives. This raises the question: how do we
compare and evaluate these different logical formalisms? To answer this
question, I present two unifying frameworks for these extended Lambek calculi.
Both are proof net calculi with graph contraction criteria. The first calculus
is a very general system: you specify the structure of your sequents and it
gives you the connectives and contractions which correspond to it. The calculus
can be extended with structural rules, which translate directly into graph
rewrite rules. The second calculus is first-order (multiplicative
intuitionistic) linear logic, which turns out to have several other,
independently proposed extensions of the Lambek calculus as fragments. I will
illustrate the use of each calculus in building bridges between analyses
proposed in different frameworks, in highlighting differences and in helping to
identify problems.Comment: Empirical advances in categorial grammars, Aug 2015, Barcelona,
Spain. 201
Equational reasoning with context-free families of string diagrams
String diagrams provide an intuitive language for expressing networks of
interacting processes graphically. A discrete representation of string
diagrams, called string graphs, allows for mechanised equational reasoning by
double-pushout rewriting. However, one often wishes to express not just single
equations, but entire families of equations between diagrams of arbitrary size.
To do this we define a class of context-free grammars, called B-ESG grammars,
that are suitable for defining entire families of string graphs, and crucially,
of string graph rewrite rules. We show that the language-membership and
match-enumeration problems are decidable for these grammars, and hence that
there is an algorithm for rewriting string graphs according to B-ESG rewrite
patterns. We also show that it is possible to reason at the level of grammars
by providing a simple method for transforming a grammar by string graph
rewriting, and showing admissibility of the induced B-ESG rewrite pattern.Comment: International Conference on Graph Transformation, ICGT 2015. The
final publication is available at Springer via
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21145-9_
A language theoretic analysis of combings
A group is combable if it can be represented by a language of words
satisfying a fellow traveller property; an automatic group has a synchronous
combing which is a regular language. This paper gives a systematic analysis of
the properties of groups with combings in various formal language classes, and
of the closure properties of the associated classes of groups. It generalises
previous work, in particular of Epstein et al. and Bridson and Gilman.Comment: DVI and Post-Script files only, 21 pages. Submitted to International
Journal of Algebra and Computatio
Certified Context-Free Parsing: A formalisation of Valiant's Algorithm in Agda
Valiant (1975) has developed an algorithm for recognition of context free
languages. As of today, it remains the algorithm with the best asymptotic
complexity for this purpose. In this paper, we present an algebraic
specification, implementation, and proof of correctness of a generalisation of
Valiant's algorithm. The generalisation can be used for recognition, parsing or
generic calculation of the transitive closure of upper triangular matrices. The
proof is certified by the Agda proof assistant. The certification is
representative of state-of-the-art methods for specification and proofs in
proof assistants based on type-theory. As such, this paper can be read as a
tutorial for the Agda system
- …