Tweet-biased summarization

We examined whether the microblog comments given by people after reading a web document could be exploited to improve the accuracy of a web document summarization system. We examined the effect of social information (i.e., tweets) on the accuracy of the generated summaries by comparing the user preference for TBS (tweet-biased summary) with GS (generic summary). The result of crowdsourcing-based evaluation shows that the user preference for TBS was significantly higher than GS. We also took random samples of the documents to see the performance of summaries in a traditional evaluation using ROUGE, which, in general, TBS was also shown to be better than GS. We further analyzed the influence of the number of tweets pointed to a web document on summarization accuracy, finding a positive moderate correlation between the number of tweets pointed to a web document and the performance of generated TBS as measured by user preference. The results show that incorporating social information into the summary generation process can improve the accuracy of summary. The reason for people choosing one summary over another in a crowdsourcing-based evaluation is also presented in this article

Bringing Structure into Summaries: Crowdsourcing a Benchmark Corpus of Concept Maps

Concept maps can be used to concisely represent important information and bring structure into large document collections. Therefore, we study a variant of multi-document summarization that produces summaries in the form of concept maps. However, suitable evaluation datasets for this task are currently missing. To close this gap, we present a newly created corpus of concept maps that summarize heterogeneous collections of web documents on educational topics. It was created using a novel crowdsourcing approach that allows us to efficiently determine important elements in large document collections. We release the corpus along with a baseline system and proposed evaluation protocol to enable further research on this variant of summarization.Comment: Published at EMNLP 201

Creating language resources for under-resourced languages: methodologies, and experiments with Arabic

Language resources are important for those working on computational methods to analyse and study languages. These resources are needed to help advancing the research in fields such as natural language processing, machine learning, information retrieval and text analysis in general. We describe the creation of useful resources for languages that currently lack them, taking resources for Arabic summarisation as a case study. We illustrate three different paradigms for creating language resources, namely: (1) using crowdsourcing to produce a small resource rapidly and relatively cheaply; (2) translating an existing gold-standard dataset, which is relatively easy but potentially of lower quality; and (3) using manual effort with appropriately skilled human participants to create a resource that is more expensive but of high quality. The last of these was used as a test collection for TAC-2011. An evaluation of the resources is also presented

Effective summarisation for search engines

Users of information retrieval (IR) systems issue queries to find information in large collections of documents. Nearly all IR systems return answers in the form of a list of results, where each entry typically consists of the title of the underlying document, a link, and a short query-biased summary of a document's content called a snippet. As retrieval systems typically return a mixture of relevant and non-relevant answers, the role of the snippet is to guide users to identify those documents that are likely to be good answers and to ignore those that are less useful. This thesis focuses on techniques to improve the generation and evaluation of query-biased summaries for informational requests, where users typically need to inspect several documents to fulfil their information needs. We investigate the following issues: how users construct query-biased summaries, and how this compares with current automatic summarisation methods; how query expansion can be applied to sentence-level ranking to improve the quality of query-biased summaries; and, how to evaluate these summarisation approaches using sentence-level relevance data. First, through an eye tracking study, we investigate the way in which users select information from documents when they are asked to construct a query-biased summary in response to a given search request. Our analysis indicates that user behaviour differs from the assumptions of current state-of-the-art query-biased summarisation approaches. A major cause of difference resulted from vocabulary mismatch, a common IR problem. This thesis then examines query expansion techniques to improve the selection of candidate relevant sentences, and to reduce the vocabulary mismatch observed in the previous study. We employ a Cranfield-based methodology to quantitatively assess sentence ranking methods based on sentence-level relevance assessments available in the TREC Novelty track, in line with previous work. We study two aspects of sentence-level evaluation of this track. First, whether sentences that have been judged based on relevance, as in the TREC Novelty track, can also be considered to be indicative; that is, useful in terms of being part of a query-biased summary and guiding users to make correct document selections. By conducting a crowdsourcing experiment, we find that relevance and indicativeness agree around 73% of the time. Second, during our evaluations we discovered a bias that longer sentences were more likely to be judged as relevant. We then propose a novel evaluation of sentence ranking methods, which aims to isolate the sentence length bias. Using our enhanced evaluation method, we find that query expansion can effectively assist in the selection of short sentences. We conclude our investigation with a second study to examine the effectiveness of query expansion in query-biased summarisation methods to end users. Our results indicate that participants significantly tend to prefer query-biased summaries aided through expansion techniques approximately 60% of the time, for query-biased summaries comprised of short and middle length sentences. We suggest that our findings can inform the generation and display of query-biased summaries of IR systems such as search engines

A qualitative analysis of a corpus of opinion summaries based on aspects

Aspect-based opinion summarization is the task of automatically generating a summary\ud for some aspects of a specific topic from a set of opinions. In most cases, to evaluate the quality of the automatic summaries, it is necessary to have a reference corpus of human\ud summaries to analyze how similar they are. The scarcity of corpora in that task has been a limiting factor for many research works. In this paper, we introduce OpiSums-PT, a corpus of extractive and abstractive summaries of opinions written in Brazilian Portuguese. We use this corpus to analyze how similar human summaries are and how people take into account the issues of aspect coverage and sentimento orientation to generate manual summaries. The results of these analyses show that human summaries are diversified and people generate summaries only for some aspects, keeping the overall sentiment orientation with little variation.Samsung Eletrônica da Amazônia Ltda

A survey on opinion summarization technique s for social media

The volume of data on the social media is huge and even keeps increasing. The need for efficient processing of this extensive information resulted in increasing research interest in knowledge engineering tasks such as Opinion Summarization. This survey shows the current opinion summarization challenges for social media, then the necessary pre-summarization steps like preprocessing, features extraction, noise elimination, and handling of synonym features. Next, it covers the various approaches used in opinion summarization like Visualization, Abstractive, Aspect based, Query-focused, Real Time, Update Summarization, and highlight other Opinion Summarization approaches such as Contrastive, Concept-based, Community Detection, Domain Specific, Bilingual, Social Bookmarking, and Social Media Sampling. It covers the different datasets used in opinion summarization and future work suggested in each technique. Finally, it provides different ways for evaluating opinion summarization