1,472 research outputs found
Lambda theories of effective lambda models
A longstanding open problem is whether there exists a non-syntactical model
of untyped lambda-calculus whose theory is exactly the least equational
lambda-theory (=Lb). In this paper we make use of the Visser topology for
investigating the more general question of whether the equational (resp. order)
theory of a non syntactical model M, say Eq(M) (resp. Ord(M)) can be
recursively enumerable (= r.e. below). We conjecture that no such model exists
and prove the conjecture for several large classes of models. In particular we
introduce a notion of effective lambda-model and show that for all effective
models M, Eq(M) is different from Lb, and Ord(M) is not r.e. If moreover M
belongs to the stable or strongly stable semantics, then Eq(M) is not r.e.
Concerning Scott's continuous semantics we explore the class of (all) graph
models, show that it satisfies Lowenheim Skolem theorem, that there exists a
minimum order/equational graph theory, and that both are the order/equ theories
of an effective graph model. We deduce that no graph model can have an r.e.
order theory, and also show that for some large subclasses, the same is true
for Eq(M).Comment: 15 pages, accepted CSL'0
Effective lambda-models vs recursively enumerable lambda-theories
A longstanding open problem is whether there exists a non syntactical model
of the untyped lambda-calculus whose theory is exactly the least lambda-theory
(l-beta). In this paper we investigate the more general question of whether the
equational/order theory of a model of the (untyped) lambda-calculus can be
recursively enumerable (r.e. for brevity). We introduce a notion of effective
model of lambda-calculus calculus, which covers in particular all the models
individually introduced in the literature. We prove that the order theory of an
effective model is never r.e.; from this it follows that its equational theory
cannot be l-beta or l-beta-eta. We then show that no effective model living in
the stable or strongly stable semantics has an r.e. equational theory.
Concerning Scott's semantics, we investigate the class of graph models and
prove that no order theory of a graph model can be r.e., and that there exists
an effective graph model whose equational/order theory is minimum among all
theories of graph models. Finally, we show that the class of graph models
enjoys a kind of downwards Lowenheim-Skolem theorem.Comment: 34
Graph Lambda Theories
to appear in MSCSInternational audienceA longstanding open problem in lambda calculus is whether there exist continuous models of the untyped lambda calculus whose theory is exactly lambda-beta or the the least sensible lambda-theory H (generated by equating all the unsolvable terms). A related question, raised recently by C. Berline, is whether, given a class of lambda models, there are a minimal lambda-theory and a minimal sensible lambda-theory represented by it. In this paper, we give a positive answer to this question for the class of graph models à la Plotkin-Scott-Engeler. In particular, we build two graph models whose theories are respectively the set of equations satisfied in any graph model and in any sensible graph model. We conjecture that the least sensible graph theory, where ''graph theory" means ''lambda-theory of a graph model", is equal to H, while in one of the main results of the paper we show the non-existence of a graph model whose equational theory is exactly the beta-theory. Another related question is whether, given a class of lambda models, there is a maximal sensible lambdatheory represented by it. In the main result of the paper we characterize the greatest sensible graph theory as the lambda-theory B generated by equating lambda-terms with the same Boehm tree. This result is a consequence of the main technical theorem of the paper: all the equations between solvable lambda-terms, which have different Boehm trees, fail in every sensible graph model. A further result of the paper is the existence of a continuum of different sensible graph theories strictly included in B
Observational Equivalence and Full Abstraction in the Symmetric Interaction Combinators
The symmetric interaction combinators are an equally expressive variant of
Lafont's interaction combinators. They are a graph-rewriting model of
deterministic computation. We define two notions of observational equivalence
for them, analogous to normal form and head normal form equivalence in the
lambda-calculus. Then, we prove a full abstraction result for each of the two
equivalences. This is obtained by interpreting nets as certain subsets of the
Cantor space, called edifices, which play the same role as Boehm trees in the
theory of the lambda-calculus
Relational Graph Models at Work
We study the relational graph models that constitute a natural subclass of
relational models of lambda-calculus. We prove that among the lambda-theories
induced by such models there exists a minimal one, and that the corresponding
relational graph model is very natural and easy to construct. We then study
relational graph models that are fully abstract, in the sense that they capture
some observational equivalence between lambda-terms. We focus on the two main
observational equivalences in the lambda-calculus, the theory H+ generated by
taking as observables the beta-normal forms, and H* generated by considering as
observables the head normal forms. On the one hand we introduce a notion of
lambda-K\"onig model and prove that a relational graph model is fully abstract
for H+ if and only if it is extensional and lambda-K\"onig. On the other hand
we show that the dual notion of hyperimmune model, together with
extensionality, captures the full abstraction for H*
On the characterization of models of H*: The semantical aspect
We give a characterization, with respect to a large class of models of
untyped lambda-calculus, of those models that are fully abstract for
head-normalization, i.e., whose equational theory is H* (observations for head
normalization). An extensional K-model is fully abstract if and only if it
is hyperimmune, {\em i.e.}, not well founded chains of elements of D cannot be
captured by any recursive function.
This article, together with its companion paper, form the long version of
[Bre14]. It is a standalone paper that presents a purely semantical proof of
the result as opposed to its companion paper that presents an independent and
purely syntactical proof of the same result
Virtual Evidence: A Constructive Semantics for Classical Logics
This article presents a computational semantics for classical logic using
constructive type theory. Such semantics seems impossible because classical
logic allows the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM), not accepted in constructive
logic since it does not have computational meaning. However, the apparently
oracular powers expressed in the LEM, that for any proposition P either it or
its negation, not P, is true can also be explained in terms of constructive
evidence that does not refer to "oracles for truth." Types with virtual
evidence and the constructive impossibility of negative evidence provide
sufficient semantic grounds for classical truth and have a simple computational
meaning. This idea is formalized using refinement types, a concept of
constructive type theory used since 1984 and explained here. A new axiom
creating virtual evidence fully retains the constructive meaning of the logical
operators in classical contexts.
Key Words: classical logic, constructive logic, intuitionistic logic,
propositions-as-types, constructive type theory, refinement types, double
negation translation, computational content, virtual evidenc
- …