74,608 research outputs found

    A bound on the number of edges in graphs without an even cycle

    Full text link
    We show that, for each fixed kk, an nn-vertex graph not containing a cycle of length 2k2k has at most 80klogkn1+1/k+O(n)80\sqrt{k}\log k\cdot n^{1+1/k}+O(n) edges.Comment: 16 pages, v2 appeared in Comb. Probab. Comp., v3 fixes an error in v2 and explains why the method in the paper cannot improve the power of k further, v4 fixes the proof of Theorem 12 introduced in v

    MaxCut in graphs with sparse neighborhoods

    Full text link
    Let GG be a graph with mm edges and let mc(G)\mathrm{mc}(G) denote the size of a largest cut of GG. The difference mc(G)m/2\mathrm{mc}(G)-m/2 is called the surplus sp(G)\mathrm{sp}(G) of GG. A fundamental problem in MaxCut is to determine sp(G)\mathrm{sp}(G) for GG without specific structure, and the degree sequence d1,,dnd_1,\ldots,d_n of GG plays a key role in getting the lower bound of sp(G)\mathrm{sp}(G). A classical example, given by Shearer, is that sp(G)=Ω(i=1ndi)\mathrm{sp}(G)=\Omega(\sum_{i=1}^n\sqrt d_i) for triangle-free graphs GG, implying that sp(G)=Ω(m3/4)\mathrm{sp}(G)=\Omega(m^{3/4}). It was extended to graphs with sparse neighborhoods by Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov. In this paper, we establish a novel and stronger result for a more general family of graphs with sparse neighborhoods. Our result can derive many well-known bounds on sp(G)\mathrm{sp}(G) in HH-free graphs GG for different HH, such as the triangle, the even cycle, the graphs having a vertex whose removal makes the graph acyclic, or the complete bipartite graph Ks,tK_{s,t} with s{2,3}s\in \{2,3\}. It can also deduce many new (tight) bounds on sp(G)\mathrm{sp}(G) in HH-free graphs GG when HH is any graph having a vertex whose removal results in a bipartite graph with relatively small Tur\'{a}n number, especially the even wheel. This contributes to a conjecture raised by Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov. Moreover, we give a new family of graphs HH such that sp(G)=Ω(m3/4+ϵ(H))\mathrm{sp}(G)=\Omega(m^{3/4+\epsilon(H)}) for some constant ϵ(H)>0\epsilon(H)>0 in HH-free graphs GG, giving an evidence to a conjecture suggested by Alon, Bollob\'as, Krivelevich and Sudakov

    An exploration of two infinite families of snarks

    Get PDF
    Thesis (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2019In this paper, we generalize a single example of a snark that admits a drawing with even rotational symmetry into two infinite families using a voltage graph construction techniques derived from cyclic Pseudo-Loupekine snarks. We expose an enforced chirality in coloring the underlying 5-pole that generated the known example, and use this fact to show that the infinite families are in fact snarks. We explore the construction of these families in terms of the blowup construction. We show that a graph in either family with rotational symmetry of order m has automorphism group of order m2m⁺¹. The oddness of graphs in both families is determined exactly, and shown to increase linearly with the order of rotational symmetry.Chapter 1: Introduction -- 1.1 General Graph Theory -- Chapter 2: Introduction to Snarks -- 2.1 History -- 2.2 Motivation -- 2.3 Loupekine Snarks and k-poles -- 2.4 Conditions on Triviality -- Chapter 3: The Construction of Two Families of Snarks -- 3.1 Voltage Graphs and Lifts -- 3.2 The Family of Snarks, Fm -- 3.3 A Second Family of Snarks, Rm -- Chapter 4: Results -- 4.1 Proof that the graphs Fm and Rm are Snarks -- 4.2 Interpreting Fm and Rm as Blowup Graphs -- 4.3 Automorphism Group -- 4.4 Oddness -- Chapter 5: Conclusions and Open Questions -- References

    Generalized Tur\'an problems for even cycles

    Full text link
    Given a graph HH and a set of graphs F\mathcal F, let ex(n,H,F)ex(n,H,\mathcal F) denote the maximum possible number of copies of HH in an F\mathcal F-free graph on nn vertices. We investigate the function ex(n,H,F)ex(n,H,\mathcal F), when HH and members of F\mathcal F are cycles. Let CkC_k denote the cycle of length kk and let Ck={C3,C4,,Ck}\mathscr C_k=\{C_3,C_4,\ldots,C_k\}. Some of our main results are the following. (i) We show that ex(n,C2l,C2k)=Θ(nl)ex(n, C_{2l}, C_{2k}) = \Theta(n^l) for any l,k2l, k \ge 2. Moreover, we determine it asymptotically in the following cases: We show that ex(n,C4,C2k)=(1+o(1))(k1)(k2)4n2ex(n,C_4,C_{2k}) = (1+o(1)) \frac{(k-1)(k-2)}{4} n^2 and that the maximum possible number of C6C_6's in a C8C_8-free bipartite graph is n3+O(n5/2)n^3 + O(n^{5/2}). (ii) Solymosi and Wong proved that if Erd\H{o}s's Girth Conjecture holds, then for any l3l \ge 3 we have ex(n,C2l,C2l1)=Θ(n2l/(l1))ex(n,C_{2l},\mathscr C_{2l-1})=\Theta(n^{2l/(l-1)}). We prove that forbidding any other even cycle decreases the number of C2lC_{2l}'s significantly: For any k>lk > l, we have ex(n,C2l,C2l1{C2k})=Θ(n2).ex(n,C_{2l},\mathscr C_{2l-1} \cup \{C_{2k}\})=\Theta(n^2). More generally, we show that for any k>lk > l and m2m \ge 2 such that 2kml2k \neq ml, we have ex(n,Cml,C2l1{C2k})=Θ(nm).ex(n,C_{ml},\mathscr C_{2l-1} \cup \{C_{2k}\})=\Theta(n^m). (iii) We prove ex(n,C2l+1,C2l)=Θ(n2+1/l),ex(n,C_{2l+1},\mathscr C_{2l})=\Theta(n^{2+1/l}), provided a strong version of Erd\H{o}s's Girth Conjecture holds (which is known to be true when l=2,3,5l = 2, 3, 5). Moreover, forbidding one more cycle decreases the number of C2l+1C_{2l+1}'s significantly: More precisely, we have ex(n,C2l+1,C2l{C2k})=O(n21l+1),ex(n, C_{2l+1}, \mathscr C_{2l} \cup \{C_{2k}\}) = O(n^{2-\frac{1}{l+1}}), and ex(n,C2l+1,C2l{C2k+1})=O(n2)ex(n, C_{2l+1}, \mathscr C_{2l} \cup \{C_{2k+1}\}) = O(n^2) for l>k2l > k \ge 2. (iv) We also study the maximum number of paths of given length in a CkC_k-free graph, and prove asymptotically sharp bounds in some cases.Comment: 37 Pages; Substantially revised, contains several new results. Mistakes corrected based on the suggestions of a refere
    corecore