Summary of results from mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection model with interaction of status (resident = 1, transient = 0) for red wolves in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Summary of results from mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection model with interaction of status (resident = 1, transient = 0) for red wolves in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Mean (± SE) body mass, age, and space use of resident and transient red wolves in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Mean (± SE) body mass, age, and space use of resident and transient red wolves in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Parameter estimates from mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection models for transient and resident red wolves in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Parameter estimates from mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection models for transient and resident red wolves in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Habitat availability and habitat proportions of space used by resident and transient red wolves in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Asterisks above the bars represent statistical differences among areas within habitat classes (<i>P</i> < 0.05, Tukey’s test). Study area proportions are shown for reference.</p

Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by resident red wolves across the Albemarle Peninsula in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by resident red wolves across the Albemarle Peninsula in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by transient red wolves across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Relative probability of 3^rd-order habitat selection by transient red wolves across the Albemarle Peninsula in northeastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Summary of results from mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection model with interaction of status (resident = 1, transient = 0) for red wolves in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.

<p>Summary of results from mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection model with interaction of status (resident = 1, transient = 0) for red wolves in eastern North Carolina during 2009–2011.</p

Comparison of model fit among the null model (no landscape features), and models with and without interactions of status (1 = resident, 0 = transient), used to test hypotheses about red wolf 3^rd-order resource selection in eastern North Carolina, 2009–2011.

<p>Comparison of model fit among the null model (no landscape features), and models with and without interactions of status (1 = resident, 0 = transient), used to test hypotheses about red wolf 3^rd-order resource selection in eastern North Carolina, 2009–2011.</p

Map of the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina with primary habitat types during 2009–2011.

<p>Map of the Albemarle Peninsula of northeastern North Carolina with primary habitat types during 2009–2011.</p

Summary of mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection models for predicting red wolf habitat use based on 5 candidate models corresponding to different hypotheses of landscape features potentially affecting 3^rd-order habitat selection by transient and resident red wolves in northeastern North Carolina, 2009–2011.

<p>Summary of mixed-effect Bayesian resource selection models for predicting red wolf habitat use based on 5 candidate models corresponding to different hypotheses of landscape features potentially affecting 3^rd-order habitat selection by transient and resident red wolves in northeastern North Carolina, 2009–2011.</p