This study examines how manufacturer-specific additive formulations used to obtain nominally identical black PLA filaments influence the thermal, mechanical, and tribological performance of FDM-printed parts. Five commercial filaments were analyzed under identical processing conditions using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile testing, pin-on-disc measurements, and stereomicroscopy. The filaments exhibited substantial compositional variability, with total additive contents ranging from 2.08 wt.% to 27.82 wt.%. One filament (M5) contained a significant fraction of inorganic fillers, confirmed by SEM/EDX as Ca-, Na- and Mg-based oxides and silicates, identifying it as a PLA-based composite despite being marketed as standard PLA. These differences strongly affected thermal behavior (Tg, Tcc, Tm) and translated directly into the performance of the printed parts. Ultimate tensile strength varied by 88.91% across all filaments (19.38–36.61 MPa), but only by 13% among the four conventional PLA filaments (M1–M4). Tribological performance differed markedly: mean coefficients of friction ranged from 0.246 (M3) to 0.368 (M2), a spread of approximately 50%, with wear-track morphologies reflecting the frictional response. Overall, the results show that PLA filaments cannot be treated as interchangeable materials. Greater transparency and standardized reporting of filament composition are needed to ensure reproducibility and support informed material selection in FDM applications
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.