A Soberania da Colômbia no 82º Meridiano

Abstract

The paper analyzes the problems between Colombia and Nicaragua regarding their border delimitation andthe ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a ruling that questioned the acts of sovereignty exercisedby Colombia in the 82nd Meridian and the loss of sea in the archipelago of San Andres, Santa Catalinaand Providencia in favor of Nicaragua. This paper is documentary review research, qualitative in nature,whose main methodology is the analysis of a single case and the position of different authors regarding theBárcenas-Esguerra treaty. The strategy was based on the collection of information, supported by documents,where a detailed tracking of texts, articles, books and columns that dealt with the research topic was carriedout, by means of the elaboration of a comparative matrix of texts. The results show that the authors coincidein stating that the Court did not consider several aspects of international law that revolve around sovereignty,international relations, the law of the sea, the Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda and territorial law.The paper analyzes the problems between Colombia and Nicaragua regarding their border delimitation and the ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), a ruling that questioned the acts of sovereignty exercised by Colombia in the 82nd Meridian and the loss of sea in the archipelago of San Andres, Santa Catalina and Providencia in favor of Nicaragua. This paper is documentary review research, qualitative in nature, whose main methodology is the analysis of a single case and the position of different authors regarding the Bárcenas-Esguerra treaty. The strategy was based on the collection of information, supported by documents, where a detailed tracking of texts, articles, books and columns that dealt with the research topic was carried out, by means of the elaboration of a comparative matrix of texts. The results show that the authors coincide in stating that the Court did not consider several aspects of international law that revolve around sovereignty, international relations, the law of the sea, the Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda and territorial law.RESUMO Este artigo trata de autores que analisam os problemas entre a Colômbia e a Nicarágua com relação à delimitação de suas fronteiras e à decisão da Corte Internacional de Justiça (CIJ), uma decisão que questionou os atos de soberania exercidos pela Colômbia no Meridiano 82 e a perda do mar no arquipélago de San Andrés, Santa Catalina e Providencia em favor da Nicarágua. Este artigo é uma pesquisa de revisão documental, de natureza qualitativa, cuja metodologia principal é a análise de um único caso e a posição de diferentes autores em relação ao tratado Bárcenas-Esguerra. A estratégia baseou-se na coleta de informações, apoiada em documentos, em que foi realizado um rastreamento detalhado de textos, artigos, livros e colunas que tratavam do tema da pesquisa, por meio da elaboração de uma matriz comparativa de textos. Os resultados mostram que os autores coincidem em afirmar que a Corte não levou em conta vários aspectos do direito internacional que giram em torno da soberania, das relações internacionais, do direito do mar, do Princípio do Pacta Sunt Servanda e do direito territorial. Traduzido com a versão gratuita do tradutor - DeepL.co