The performance monitoring system handles representational conflicts with the goal of reducing
errors. What remains unclear is whether and how the representational nature of a stimulus modulates
conflict resolution. To deal with this issue, we performed five experiments to measure the degree of
cognitive interference occurring in Flanker tasks and tested whether effects induced by body- and
non-body-related stimuli may change as a function of task requirements and affect conflict
processing. In Experiment1, conflicts elicited by hands/letters were used to activate typical competing
responses. In Experiment2, stimuli were perceptually matched for low-level features (e.g.,
target/flanker contrast). In Experiment3, no-go trials were added to increase conflict load and reveal
content-driven effects in inhibitory control. In Experiment 4, the onset of target/flanker competition
was set at two different delays to investigate conflict persistence during target processing. Finally, in
Experiment5, body- vs non-body-related stimuli were combined to measure content-driven effects
underlying conflict resolution. A multi-analysis approach to data was employed, combining linear
and Bayesian drift-diffusion models. Results show that body-related representations reduced
cognitive interference, a robust effect that was observed across all experiments. These findings
suggest that representations related to the body selectively engage the performance monitoring system
during conflict processin
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.