On generalisations of conciseness

Abstract

Based on the notions of conciseness and semiconciseness, we show that these properties are not equivalent by proving that a word originally presented by Ol’shanskii is semiconcise but not concise. We further establish that every 1/m-concise word is semiconcise by proving that when the group-word w takes finitely many values in G, the iterated commutator subgroup [w(G), G, (m) ...,G] is finite for some m ∈ N if and only if [w(G), G] is finite.The author is supported by the project PID2020-117281GB-I00 (Spanish Government, partially funded with ERDF) and by the research group 244 Álgebra. Aplicaciones (Public University of Navarra). Open Access funding provided by Universidad Publica de Navarra

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Academica-e (Univ. Pública de Navarra)

redirect
Last time updated on 27/12/2025

This paper was published in Academica-e (Univ. Pública de Navarra).

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.

Licence: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess