FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History
Abstract
A landlord\u27s motion for a default judgment was denied, and the court granted a tenant\u27s motion for leave to file a late answer in a non-payment proceeding. The court reasoned that a meritorious defense is not an essential element for a late answer motion when no default judgment has been entered. The court was persuaded by the short, eight-day delay between the tenant\u27s counsel appearing and filing the motion. Citing a lack of prejudice to the landlord and the public policy of resolving cases on their merits, the court granted the tenant\u27s motion
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.