Background: The optimal dose of tinzaparin for prophylaxis in obese medical patients is not well defined.
Objectives: To evaluate the anti-Xa activity in obese medical patients on tinzaparin prophylaxis adjusted for actual bodyweight.
Methods: Patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 treated with 50 IU/kg tin-
zaparin once daily were prospectively included. Anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity; von Wil- lebrand factor antigen and von Willebrand activity; factor VIII activity; D-dimer, prothrombin fragments; and thrombin generation were measured 4 hours after sub- cutaneous injection between days 1 and 14 after the initiation of tinzaparin prophylaxis. Results: We included 121 plasma samples from 66 patients (48.5% women), with a median weight of 125 kg (range, 82-300 kg) and a median body mass index of 41.9 kg/ m2 (range, 30.1-88.6 kg/m2). The target anti-Xa activity of 0.2 to 0.4 IU/mL was ach- ieved in 80 plasma samples (66.1%); 39 samples (32.2%) were below and 2 samples (1.7%) above the target range. The median anti-Xa activity was 0.25 IU/mL (IQR, 0.19- 0.31 IU/mL), 0.23 IU/mL (IQR, 0.17-0.28 IU/mL), and 0.21 IU/mL (IQR, 0.17-0.25 IU/mL)
on days 1 to 3, days 4 to 6, and days 7 to 14, respectively. The anti-Xa activity did not differ among the weight groups (P = .19). Injection into the upper arm compared to the abdomen resulted in a lower endogenous thrombin potential, a lower peak thrombin, and a trend to a higher anti-Xa activity.
Conclusion: Dosing of tinzaparin adjusted for actual bodyweight in obese patients achieved anti-Xa activity in the target range for most patients, without accumulation or overdosing. In addition, there is a significant difference in thrombin generation depending on the injection site
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.