Collaborative governance based on local wisdom in achieving Village SDGs

Abstract

Background: Collaborative Governance basically aims to jointly solve certain problems or issues from the related parties. These parties are not only limited to government and non-government agencies, because in the principles of good governance, stakeholders and civil society are involved in the formulation and decision-making. Methods: This study uses a descriptive qualitative research approach. Data collection techniques used are interviews, literature studies, observations, and documentation. Findings: Collaboration is initiated due to the limitations of capacity, resources and networks owned by each party, so that cooperation can unite and complement various components that encourage the successful achievement of common goals. In the collaboration of formulating shared goals, visions, missions, norms and values, the position of each party is equal, namely having the authority to make decisions independently even though they are bound by mutual agreement. Therefore, it can be concluded that Collaborative Governance is cooperation between stakeholders based on shared principles to achieve certain goals including in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which are Government policies. The purpose of this study is to determine how the implementation of collaborative governance of stakeholders in achieving sustainable development goals/SDGs Village and analyze the factors that influence collaboration. The theory used is the collaborative governance model of Ansell and Gash. Conclusion: The results of the study show that collaborative governance based on local wisdom in achieving sustainable development goals/SDGs in Tenganan Village, Manggis District, Karangasem Regency, seen from the initial conditions, institutional design and collaborative processes have been running well, but the Institutional Design has not been optimally implemented. Factors that influence collaboration are networked structure, commitment to a common purpose, distributive accountability/responsibility, information sharing, and local wisdom, while the only inhibiting factor is access to resources. Novelty/Originality of this article: The recommendation given is the need for technical instructions in the preparation of the direction of Village SDGs policies and the formation of a work team in the implementation of collaboration

Similar works

Full text

Journal of Religion and Environmental Humanities

redirect
Last time updated on 16/10/2025

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.

Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/