Norway has positioned itself as a climate policy forerunner by aiming to reach net-zero emissions
already by 2030. However, the net-zero ambition is not well-defined, not legally binding, nor
substantiated by action plans. In a first, interdisciplinary, analysis we scrutinise the net-zero concept
and discuss unilateral options. Second, we provide an economic analysis with a global computable
model, SNOW, of the costs and macroeconomic impacts of various policy scenarios. It explores how
the net-zero ambition interacts with other 2030 goals and quantifies the impacts of emphasising
domestic abatement and carbon removal measures vs. paying for emission mitigation abroad.
Finally, the 2030 results are revisited to assess how well they align with Norwegian and global
climate targets for 2050.
The main findings are that pursuing the net-zero ambition, on top of other binding 2030 goals
Norway is already committed to, will increase costs by 25-100% depending on the use of domestic
measures. On the margin, domestic measures are found to have only small, uncertain, and costly
mitigation potential, thus, buying international carbon credits will be inevitable. Besides being
significantly cheaper, carbon trading can have the potential benefits of developing the credit
markets and the individual projects’ qualities. Even if domestic measures can play but a modest part
in the net-zero strategy towards 2030, we identify several steps governments unilaterally can take
today to expand abatement opportunities towards mid-century. We also find measures that seem
cost-effective in pursuing 2030 goals but look less attractive against a global 2050 backdrop
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.