Inga v. Revenco

Abstract

The court partially granted the landlord\u27s motion to amend the petition to include GCEL applicability and good cause grounds, and partially granted the tenant\u27s motion to amend her answer. It denied the tenant\u27s motion to dismiss outright. While the initial predicate notice served before GCEL\u27s enactment was valid, the petition filed afterward needed to conform. The court allowed the landlord to proceed on the **non-payment of rent** ground, finding it sufficiently pleaded with specific amounts and dates, but dismissed the **nuisance** and **illegal sublet** grounds due to lack of factual specificity in the petition