This paper examines the use of bioethical principles in the official medical
discourse for the surgical management of these cases. Educational materials
on video from the American Association of Medical Schools on ‘differences in
sexual development’ were subjected to semi-quantitative analysis. Digital documents
available on the web were revised to catalog Latin American countries
that allow the change of name and registered sex without the prerequisite of
genital surgeries. The reconceptualization of the principle of benevolence
from medical humanism is used as a rhetorical strategy to privilege the biotechnical
gaze of expert knowledge and to ensure the clinical management of
the intersex spectrum. In contrast, the public policy of ten Latin American
countries gives priority to principles of bioethics and human rights by not
requiring genital surgeries. The principle of benevolence in the official medical
discourse of the United States is a failed act by omitting genital surgeries
from the discussion and by continuing to privilege expert knowledge. The
intersex spectrum allows us to study the intersectionality between sex/gender,
bioethics and human rights and reaffirms the need to include these issues in
academic training from our latitudes
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.