The purpose of my research was to investigate participative management at the Albany Museum
with a view to generating knowledge and insights that can be used to support senior
management’s engagement with participative management at mid-management level. My
interest was to investigate participative management with regards to five HODs of the Albany
Museum with a view to generating knowledge and insights that can be used to support senior
management’s engagement with participative management at mid-management level.
The research was informed by the interpretive paradigm. The interpretive paradigm does not
concern itself with the search for broadly applicable laws and rules but rather seeks to produce
descriptive analyses that emphasise deep interpretation and understanding of social phenomena
through the meaning that the people assign to them.
This study is mostly descriptive and presents the reality of participants from their own
experience. Semi-structured interviews and observation capture ‘insider’ knowledge that is part
of an interpretive methodology.
The study found that participative management was both understood and generally accepted as a
good way to manage an organisation, and even members who were critical of it could see its
benefits. However, the fractured and diversified structure of the organisation calls for a
particularly skillful application of this management approach, one which would also demand
leadership and a greater sense of working towards what are called collegial models of
management. Whether this is in fact desirable for a museum is debatable
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.