Defendant\u27s Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff\u27s Motion to Exclude Testimony from 1954 Coroner\u27s Inquest

Abstract

The State of Ohio asserted that testimony from the 1954 coroner\u27s inquest should not be excluded because the coroner\u27s inquest was carried out properly under Ohio law. Sam Sheppard\u27s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights would not be violated by admitting this evidence, nor would his right to due process. Additionally, coroner records are admissible as public records. See order ruling on this motion

Similar works

This paper was published in Cleveland-Marshall College of Law.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.