Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Perfectionism and the experience of pride, shame, and guilt: Comparing healthy perfectionists, unhealthy perfectionists, and non-perfectionists

By Joachim Stoeber, Rachel A. Harris and Paul S. Moon

Abstract

According to traditional views, perfectionists are prone to experience shame and guilt and unable to experience pride. Hamachek (1978), however, suggested that this applies only to neurotic perfectionists, whereas normal perfectionists are able to experience pride and are not prone to experience shame and guilt. Following Hamachek's differentiation, the present study investigated 121 undergraduates and compared healthy perfectionists (high perfectionistic strivings, low perfectionistic concerns), unhealthy perfectionists (high perfectionistic strivings, high perfectionistic concerns), and non-perfectionists (low perfectionistic strivings) regarding proneness to shame, guilt, and pride and state shame, guilt, and pride following success and failure. As expected, healthy perfectionists reported more state pride and less state shame and guilt than unhealthy perfectionists and non-perfectionists. Moreover, healthy perfectionists indicated lower proneness to shame than unhealthy perfectionists and non-perfectionists. However, both healthy and unhealthy perfectionists indicated higher proneness to pride and higher proneness to guilt than non-perfectionists. Supporting views of perfectionism that differentiate between positive and negative forms of the construct, the present findings show that individuals, who strive for perfection, but are unconcerned about imperfections, may well experience pride and be prone to feel guilt, but not shame

Topics: BF
Publisher: Elsevier Science B. V. Amsterdam
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:kar.kent.ac.uk:2292

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A hierarchical structural analysis of perfectionism and its relation to other personality characteristics. doi
  2. (2005). Adaptive and maladaptive aspects of self-oriented versus socially prescribed perfectionism. doi
  3. (2001). An investigation of the dimensions of perfectionism in college students.
  4. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motive all at once: The Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). doi
  5. (1999). Leisure satisfaction and attitudes of perfectionists: Implications for therapeutic recreation professionals.
  6. (1996). Moral affect and cognitive processes: Differentiating shame from guilt among men and women. doi
  7. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. doi
  8. (2004). Perfectionism and acceptance. doi
  9. (2002). Perfectionism and maladjustment: An overview of theoretical, definitional, and treatment issues. In doi
  10. (2002). Perfectionism and the self-conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. In doi
  11. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. doi
  12. (2006). Perfectionism, shame, and depressive symptoms. doi
  13. (2005). Positive and negative perfectionism and the shame/guilt distinction: Adaptive and maladaptive characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, doi
  14. (1995). Positive and negative perfectionism. doi
  15. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. doi
  16. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism.
  17. (2002). Shame and guilt. doi
  18. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. doi
  19. (2002). The nature and assessment of perfectionism: A critical analysis. In doi
  20. (1985). The quest for perfection: Avoiding guilt or avoiding shame? doi
  21. (2001). The Revised Almost Perfect Scale. doi
  22. (1994). The State Shame and Guilt Scale.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.