Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Mulla Sadra and the mind-body problem:\ud A critical assessment of Sadra’s approach to the dichotomy of soul and spirit

By Abdulaziz Daftari

Abstract

Abstract\ud The presence of some ambiguity about the two terms of soul and spirit, which up until now has not been considered, has been investigated in this research. This ambiguity has created problems in different fields of study such as philosophy, psychology and commentaries of religious texts. This is because the two words are usually used synonymously.\ud The main aim of this research is to investigate whether the human being has an independent spirit in addition to the body and the soul or not. In other words it is attempting to establish if man is a tripartite existence made of body, soul and spirit.\ud In order to attain this aim the ideas of various philosophers are discussed on different subjects regarding the soul with particular attention to the philosophical system introduced in the seventeenth century AD by the Muslim philosopher, Sadr al-din Shirazi. This consisted of two other philosophical systems in Islamic philosophy, peripatetic (mashā‟) and illuminative („ishrāq) combined with mystical and religious teachings. His idea about the soul was set as the basis for the arguments regarding the soul and the ideas of other philosophers were compared to it.\ud This research explores the principles that form Sadra‟s beliefs about the soul. One of Sadra‟s principles, the fundamentality of existence, is explained. This principle aims to prove the reality of the external world and the soul as one of these realities. The topics of motion and time and the views of philosophers about these are cited. In addition, another Sadra‟s important principles, trans-substantial motion, is mentioned and explained and it is suggested that the difference between Sadra‟s and other philosophers‟ ideas about the soul lies in accepting or rejecting motion in substance. According to Sadra, the soul which is material at the beginning of its creation moves towards immateriality by trans-substantial motion.\ud Then philosophers‟ ideas about the soul are mentioned as well as their disagreements regarding different issues such as immateriality, motion, origination of the soul etc. In addition, the problem that Sadra‟s philosophical system faces in regard to the soul is discussed in particular since it is the main aim of this research.\ud It is concluded that Sadra‟s idea is more complete than the other ideas regarding the soul. The existence of the soul found a better justification in this idea. The problem of dualism of the soul and body with which other philosophers were faced has been resolved. Meanwhile the problem of this philosophical idea which sees the soul to be the same as the spirit was investigated and it was stated that this problem has caused many diversities of opinion between philosophers in subjects related to the soul. The propounded solution for all the cases was to accept the dichotomy of the soul and spirit. Religious texts have been classified, analysed and used to support this idea and by using different evidences it was confirmed that the soul and the spirit are two independent substances and that the human being is a tripartite existence

Topics: "Mind", "Body", "Soul", "Spirit", "Dichotomy".
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.dur.ac.uk:506
Provided by: Durham e-Theses

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. A History of Philosophy, translated by Jallāl al Din Mojtabavī,
  2. (2007). Abd al-Rasūl, The fundamentality of existence and the subjectivity of quiddity, translated by Dāwoud Sodagar and Muhammad Legenhausen. doi
  3. Abulhassan ibn Abdulhussein, Al-Mawā‟iẓ al-„adadīyya,
  4. (1317). Afkār-i Suhrawardī wa Mulla Sadra.
  5. Al-Borhān fi Tafsīr al-Qur‟an, doi
  6. (1936). Al-Fīlsūf al-fārsī al-kabīr,
  7. (1981). Al-ḥikma al-Muta'aliyah fil- Asfār al-'Aqliyyah al-arba'ah, Beirut: Dār i-„Iḥyā‟ al-Turāth al-„Arabī Publications,
  8. Al-Ishārāt wal Tanbīhāt, commentary of Tūsī and qutb al-din Rāzī. Qom: Nashr Al-balāgha Publications,
  9. (1966). Al-Mabāḥith al-mashriqīyyah fī „ilm al-„ilāhīyyāt,
  10. Al-Mabda‟ wal-Ma‟ād, Tehran: Bonyād-i Ḥikmat-i Islamīy-i Sadra Publications,
  11. al-mantiq, Qom: Najafī al-Mar‟ashī Publications. _____ . Shifā, kitab-i nafs, investigated by Hasan Zādi Āmulῑ, Qum: Markazi Nashr Press,
  12. Al-masā‟l al-qudsiyya, Rasā‟l-i falsafī,
  13. (1420). Al-Matālib al-„ālīya, Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-„Ilmyya Publications,
  14. Al-Mizān fi tafsīr al-Qur‟an, translated by Sayyed mohammad baqir Mousawī Hamadanī,
  15. Al-Shawāhid al-rubūbīyya, Introduction, with annotation and Edition by Sayyed Jalāl Āshtiani,
  16. Ali Akbar, Qāmūs-i Qur‟an, Tehran: Dār al-Kutub-i Islāmīya Publications,
  17. Āmῡzish-i Falsafi, Tehran: Sāzimān-i Tablīghāt-i Islāmī Publications,
  18. (2001). Arastūy-i fīlsūf, translated by A. Āzādī. Tehran: Arastou Press,
  19. (2003). Aṣāla al-wujūd”.
  20. Asrār al-„āyāt, „Tehran: Anjoman-i Islamīy-i Ḥikmat Wa Falsafa-i Iran Publications,
  21. (1981). Avicenna and the Visionary Recital. Translated by W.R.
  22. (2007). Bahmanyār, Encyclopaedia of Islam. Edited by: doi
  23. (1980). Beirut: Dār al-Qalam Press,
  24. (1968). Beyond the pleasure principle, doi
  25. Bidāya al-ḥikma, Qom: Matba‟i al-„Ilmiyya Press,
  26. Darāmadī bar falsafa-i islamī,
  27. Dawra-i āthār-i folūtīn, translated by Mohammad Hussein Lutfī,
  28. Durūs-i m‟rifat-i nafs, Tehran: „Ilmī Wa Farhangī Press,
  29. Faḍl ibn hassan, Majma‟ al-bayān,
  30. Farhang-i Falsafī, translated by Manūchihr Ṣāni‟ī Darribīdī,
  31. Farhang-i Ma‟ārif-i Islamῑ,
  32. Fatḥulla, Monhaj al-Ṣadiqīn,
  33. Geometrical relativity and fourth dimension, Translated by Amir Ahmadi,
  34. Hadi, Sharh-i manẓūma, Edited by Hassan Zāda-i Āmulī,
  35. (2005). Handbook of Greek Philosophy: from Thales to the Stoics: Analysis and Fragments.
  36. Ḥaqīqat-i rūḥ, Tehran: Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i Islami Press,
  37. Ḥarika wa istīfāy-i aqsām-i „on,
  38. Harikat wa zamᾱn dar falsafa-i islᾱmῑ,
  39. Hastῑ shinᾱsῑ.
  40. (1365). Hizār wa yik nokta, Tehran: Markaz-i Nashr-i Farhangī-i Rajā Publications,
  41. (1410). Ibn Ali, Kanz al-Fawā‟d, corrected by Abdulla Na‟ma, Qom: Dār al-Zakhā‟ir Press,
  42. (1379). Ilm al-nafs-i falsafī. Qom: Imam Khomeini Institute for Education and Research Press,
  43. Insān shināsī,
  44. Īqāẓ al-nā‟imīn, Tehran: „Anjoman-i Islamīy-i Ḥikmat Wa Falsafa-i Iran Publications,
  45. (1967). Islamic studies, Beirut: Librairie,
  46. Kashkūl, translated and explained by Mohammad Bāqir-i Sā‟idī, Tehran: Kitabforoushī-i Islamī Press,
  47. (1968). Kolīyyāt-i falsafi, translated by Jalāl al-Din Mujtabawī,
  48. Ma'ānī al-„akhbār,
  49. Mafāhīm-i kollī, Ma‟rifat-i Falsafī,
  50. Mafātīḥ al-ghayb, commentary of A. Nourī, Tehran: Mu‟asisa Mutāli‟āt Wa Taḥqīqāt-i Farhangī Publications,
  51. (2009). Majmū‟a-i āthār, Tehran: Sadra Publications, 1387 SH. 298 Muhammadī-i Rayshahri, Mohammad, The scale of wisdom (A Compendium of Shi‟a ḥadīth),
  52. Majmū‟a-i Maqālāt-i Hamāyish-i Jahānīy-i ḥakīm Mulla Sadra, doi
  53. Majmū‟a-i muṣannafāt-i shaykh-i ishrāq, Tehran: Pajūhishgāh-i „Ulūm-i Insānī Wa Mutāli‟āt-i Farhangī Press,
  54. Majmῡ‟a-i rasᾱil-i falsafῑ-i sadr al-muta‟allihīn,
  55. (1982). Mantiq al-Mashriqīyīn, al-nafs, Qom: Dār al-Ḥidātha Press,
  56. Maqālāt, Mabānī-i Nazarī-i Tazkīya,
  57. Mir borhan al-din mohammad baqir, Muṣanafāt, Tehran: Anjoman-i Āthār Wa Mafākhir-i Farhangī Publications, 1381 SH. Abīfirās Warram. Majmū‟a-i warrām.
  58. Mirzā mohammad, Qiṣaṣ al-„ulamā,
  59. Mohammad ibn „umar, Sharh-i „uyῡn al-Ḥikmat ,
  60. Mohammad ibn Hassan furūkh, Baṣā‟r al-Darajāt,
  61. Mohammad ibn no‟man, Al-Ikhtiṣāṣ, Qom: Kongiriy-i Jahānīy-i Shaykh-i Mufīd Press,
  62. Mohammad ibn Ya‟qūb, „Uṣūl-i Kāfī, Kitab al-„aql wal-jahl, translated in Persian by Sayyed Jawād Muṣtafawī. Tehran: Daftar-i Nashr-i Farhang-i Ahl al-Bayt
  63. Mohammad ibn-i mas‟ūd, Tafsīr-i „ayyāshī.
  64. Mohammad Taqi, Ma‟ārif-i Qur‟an,
  65. Mostadrak al-vasā‟il,
  66. (2003). Nazarīya-i Sūrat dar falsafa-i arastū,
  67. Nihāya al-ḥikma,
  68. Niẓām-i Ḥikmat -i sadrā‟ī: Tashkīk dar wujūd. Qom: Imam Khomeini Institute for Education and Research Press,
  69. Nour al-din ibn sharif al-din, Majālis al-Mo‟minīn, Tehran: Ketabforūshī-i Islamī Publications,
  70. (2007). Parmenides and the History of Dialectic. doi
  71. Qawā‟id-i kolī-i falsafī dar falsafa-i Islāmi, Tehran: Anjoman-i Islamī-i Ḥikma Wa Falsafa-i Iran,
  72. (1430). Qutb al-Dīn, Sharh-i hikma al-ishrāq, Tehran: Institute of Islamic study of Tehran university, Mack Gale university and Ḥikmat Publications,
  73. Rābita-i nafs wa badan az nadhar-i Mulla Sadra,
  74. Rasā‟l-i falsafī,
  75. Rawābit-i Ḥikmat -i ishrāq wa falsafa-i Iran-i bāstān.
  76. Reihānat al-adab, Tehran: 1331 SH. 303 Tamīmī „Āmudī, Abdulwahid ibn mohammad, Ghurar al-ḥikam wa durar al-kilam, Qom: daftar-i Tablīghat-i Islamī Press,
  77. Risāla fil-ḥudūth, Tehran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Research
  78. (1983). Risāla-i „āqil bi-ma‟qūl, Edited by Hassan Hasan Zāda-i Amulī. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications Centre,
  79. Risᾱla al-Fawā‟id, Majmou‟a-i rasā‟il-i falsafī-i sadr al-mut‟allihīn,
  80. (1427). Risᾱla al-shawahid al-rubῡbῑyyah, Edited by Zahra Muṣtafawī,
  81. Rūḥ wa Nafs, Tehran: Bonyād-i Ḥikmat-i Sadra Publications,
  82. Sayr-i falsafa dar jahān-i islam, translated by N. Purjawadi,
  83. (1997). Secondary Intelligible, An Analytical and Comparative Study
  84. sharḥ al-Asfar al-„arba‟a, nafs,
  85. Sharḥ-i „uṣūl-i Kāfī,
  86. Sharh-i mabsῡt-i mandhῡma,
  87. Sharḥ-i mukhtaṣar-i madhūma,
  88. Sharh-i zindigānī-i jalāl al-Din-i Dawānī. doi
  89. (1987). Sharḥī kūtāh bar Naqd-i „aql-i maḥḍ-i Kant, translated by E. Sa‟ādatī-i khamsi,
  90. Sih „Aṣl,
  91. Sih Ḥakīm-i musalmān, translated by Ahmad Ārām, Tehran: „Ilmī Wa Farhangī Publications,
  92. (2003). Ta„liqa bar Shifā,
  93. Tafsīr-i „Ahsan al-ḥadīth, Tehran: Bonyādi Bi‟that Publications,
  94. Tafsīr-i min waḥy al-Qur‟an. Beirut: al-Milāk lilṭabā‟ah Wa-Nashr Press,
  95. Tafsīr-i Qur‟an,
  96. Taqī, Biḥār al-anwār, Bayroot:
  97. Tārīkh-i „Ālam Ārāy-i „Abbāsī.
  98. (1994). The Arabic Interest of the Natural philosophers in seventeenth century, doi
  99. (1979). The Making of Mind, doi
  100. (1986). The Self and Its Brain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,
  101. The Series of Plato‟s works, Jomhourī, translated by Mohammad Hassan lotfī in Persian,
  102. (1409). translated by Abdullah Yusuf Ali. „Ᾱmilī, Ḥurr, Wasā‟l al-shi‟a, Qom: Mu‟asisa-i „Āl al-Bayt Publications,
  103. translated by Jawād-i fāḍil,
  104. translated by Mohammad Dashti,
  105. translation and Edited by, Golam Hussein Āhanī, Isfahan: Shahriar Publications,
  106. Uyūn-i „akhbār al-riḍā, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.