Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Factors Underlying Students' Conceptions of Deep Time: An Exploratory Study

By KIM CHEEK

Abstract

ABSTRACT\ud Geologic or “deep time” is important for understanding many geologic processes. There are two aspects to deep time. First, events in Earth’s history can be placed in temporal order on an immense time scale (succession). Second, rates of geologic processes vary significantly. Thus, some events and processes require time periods (durations) that are outside a human lifetime by many orders of magnitude. Previous research has demonstrated that learners of all ages and many teachers have poor conceptions of succession and duration in deep time. The question is why. \ud This exploratory, qualitative study investigates the viability of a model (a deep time stool) to capture the underlying factors necessary for a concept of deep time. The model posits that a concept of deep time rests upon: an understanding of succession and duration in conventional time; a robust understanding of large numbers and the proportional relationships among numbers of various magnitudes; and a learner’s geoscience content knowledge. While all three factors may not exist to the same degree in any one individual, all must be present to support a conception of deep time.\ud Thirty-five students in the United States participated in individual task-based interviews: 12 eighth and 11 eleventh graders from a public charter school in the U.S. and 12 university students from two institutions enrolled in an introductory geoscience course. Tasks and questions probed students’ understandings of the three factors within and outside a deep time context, and the study is unique for that reason.\ud Results indicate all three factors play an important role in how students understand deep time. While succession in conventional time proved non-problematic, duration was more difficult for participants. Some students were confused about the relationships among numbers in the thousands and millions, and others appeared to have little understanding of time periods up to 100 years. Participants had just as much difficulty dealing with the duration for events in conventional time as they did for those in deep time if the events were unfamiliar to them. \ud Time and number share a similar spatial mapping strategy while knowledge of large numbers and geoscience content knowledge appear to provide reference points that can be used to judge the temporal order or duration of geoscience events. Implications for future research and classroom practice are discussed.\u

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.dur.ac.uk:277
Provided by: Durham e-Theses

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the "pieces" vs. "coherence" controversy (From the "pieces" side of the fence). doi
  2. (2000). A scientific perspective on structure, task-based interviews in mathematics education research.
  3. (1990). About time: Inventing the fourth dimension. doi
  4. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. doi
  5. (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. doi
  6. (2009). America's Best Colleges
  7. (2004). An analysis of the understanding of geological time by students at secondary and post-secondary level. doi
  8. (2007). An introduction to threshold concepts. doi
  9. (2001). An investigation into the understanding of geological time among 17-year-old students, with implications for the subject matter knowledge of future teachers. doi
  10. (1998). An investigation into understanding of geological time among 10-and 11-year-old children. doi
  11. (1979). An understanding of geologic time.
  12. (1994). Assessing selected physical science and earth science misconceptions of middle school through university preservice teachers.
  13. (2005). Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience course: Results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory.
  14. (1982). Basin and range.
  15. (2002). Bringing Research on Learning to the Geosciences. Report from a workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Johnson Foundation,
  16. (2006). Building an understanding of geological time: A cognitive synthesis of the "macro" and "micro" scales of time. doi
  17. (2008). Calibrating the mental number line. doi
  18. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. doi
  19. (2003). Celebration of the success of distributed research with schools: doi
  20. (1980). Children's concepts about time no barrier to understanding the geologic past. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  21. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers.
  22. (2003). Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. doi
  23. (2007). College student conceptions of geological time and the disconnect between ordering and scale.
  24. (2000). Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history, and science. doi
  25. (2009). Concepts of scale held by students with visual impairment. doi
  26. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students' and experts' concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. doi
  27. (1996). Constructivism and evidence from children's ideas. doi
  28. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In
  29. (1982). Conventional time concepts and children's structuring of time.
  30. (1988). Descriptive studies of students' conceptions in science. doi
  31. (2009). Developing a sense of scale: Looking backward. doi
  32. (2001). Development of concepts of interrelationships among duration, distance, and speed. doi
  33. (1990). Development of numberline and measurement concepts. doi
  34. (2005). Developmental and cognitive perspectives on humans' sense of the times of past and future events. doi
  35. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. doi
  36. (2009). Digging deep: Exploring college students' knowledge of macroevolutionary time. doi
  37. (2005). Digging into earth science: Alternative conceptions held by K-12 teachers.
  38. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage Publications.
  39. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. doi
  40. (2005). Elementary students' ideas concerning fossil fuel energy.
  41. (2008). Experienced and novice teachers' concepts of spatial scale. doi
  42. (1993). for the Advancement of Science. doi
  43. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. doi
  44. (2008). Geoscience education: An overview. doi
  45. (1989). How inferences about novel domainrelated concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge.
  46. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics intuitive rules. Ways of Knowing in Science Series.
  47. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. doi
  48. (1981). Integrating velocity, time, and distance information: A developmental study. doi
  49. (2008). Intelligent Design. doi
  50. (1999). Intuitive rules: A way to explan and predict students' reasoning. doi
  51. (2007). Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections . doi
  52. (1999). Is diachronic thought a specific reasoning ability? doi
  53. (2007). Learning Earth Sciences. In
  54. (1991). Learning to listen: A student's understanding of powers of ten. doi
  55. (2006). Learning to think spatially.
  56. (2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. doi
  57. (2002). Maps as representations: Expert novice comparison of projection understanding. doi
  58. (2003). Measuring student understanding of geological time. doi
  59. (2006). Memory for time: How people date events. doi
  60. (2008). Mental modeling in conceptual change. doi
  61. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. doi
  62. (2004). Modes of knowing and ways of reasoning in elementary astronomy. doi
  63. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. doi
  64. (2009). Nutrition: National School Lunch Program. doi
  65. (2002). On the nature of naive physics. In doi
  66. (1984). On the understanding of the relationships between speed, duration, and distance. doi
  67. (2009). Part II: Chapter 3: Common qualitative methods. Retrieved
  68. (1997). Portuguese students' understanding at ages 10-11 and 14-15 of the origin and nature of the Earth and the development of life. doi
  69. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. doi
  70. (2005). Qualitative analysis of college students' ideas about the Earth: Interviews and open-ended questionnaires.
  71. (1993). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to the major traditions.
  72. (1994). Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming.
  73. (2007). Research in science education: The expert-novice continuum.
  74. (2002). Research methodologies in science education: The qualitative-quantitative debate.
  75. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. doi
  76. (1984). Soil genesis and development: Views held by New Zealand students. doi
  77. (2009). Special issue: Learning progressions. doi
  78. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. doi
  79. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. doi
  80. (1992). Students' alternative conceptions of earth and space. doi
  81. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. doi
  82. (2006). The changing Earth: Exploring geology and evolution (4th ed.).
  83. (1969). The Child's Conception of Time. doi
  84. (2006). The chronologers' quest: The search for the age of the Earth. New York: doi
  85. (1982). The clinical interview and the measurement of conceptual change. doi
  86. (2006). The concept of time: can it be fully realised and taught? doi
  87. (2008). The conceptual change approach and the teaching of science. doi
  88. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. doi
  89. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. doi
  90. (1992). The development of the concept of time in children: An integrative model. In doi
  91. (1974). The development of time concepts through conflict based on a primitive duration capacity. doi
  92. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. doi
  93. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. doi
  94. (2009). The gripping statistic.
  95. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. doi
  96. (2003). The man who found time. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing. doi
  97. (1982). The nature and development of time concepts in children: The effects of interfering cues. doi
  98. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. doi
  99. (1986). The performance of college students on Piaget-type tasks dealing with distance, time, and speed. doi
  100. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. doi
  101. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. doi
  102. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. doi
  103. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. doi
  104. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research.
  105. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift.
  106. (2003). Threshold concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines. Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses. Occasional,
  107. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. doi
  108. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts' characteristics. In doi
  109. (1996). Understanding changes in time. London: Taylor and Francis. 386 doi
  110. (2001). What is deep time and why should anyone care?
  111. (2002). Why "conceptual ecology" is a good idea. In doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.