Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Paper, Pottery and Prosperity:\ud Handicrafts and Rural Development in Thailand\ud

By JITSUDA LIMKRIENGKRAI

Abstract

The focus of this thesis is on the role of handicraft production in rural development in Northern Thailand, exploring how handicrafts evolve over time in the context of a modernising economy. This links with on-going debates on community-based development theory, including those related to rural industrialisation, rural-urban relations and biases, indigenous knowledge, rural poverty and livelihoods. The thesis seeks to return to an issue which was a popular area of investigation in the 1970s, namely the role of small-scale industries in rural development. Rural spaces have always contained an element of non-farm activities, often classified as ‘handicraft production’. Two villages in Chiang Mai province in Northern Thailand have been selected for study in order to assess the roles of handicrafts in rural development. One selected case study village is Baan Ton Pao, which is engaged in saa (mulberry) paper making. The other selected village is Baan Muang Kung, where handicraft production is based on pottery making. Through an empirical study of these two villages, Baan Ton Pao and Baan Muang Kung, this thesis shows that handicrafts have significant potential for promoting rural industrialisation and supporting rural development, especially through the One Tambon One Product programme. Handicrafts are, therefore, contributing to rural poverty alleviation through employment and income generation, and through generating economic growth rooted in the countryside, separate from efforts directed at agriculture and farming. However, it is also important to understand how this very effort is also creating new inequalities in the countryside and, arguably, new populations of poor people. The study is important because it has been argued – as noted above – that handicrafts have significant potential for promoting rural industries and supporting rural development and rural livelihoods – and yet this has rarely been studied in any great detail. The conceptual frameworks are impressive; the empirical support remains thin. This thesis contributes in a significant way to debates about rural development and particularly handicrafts in Thailand and beyond. \u

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.dur.ac.uk:268
Provided by: Durham e-Theses

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). A Buddhist Economic Approach to Happiness and Capability Linkage in
  2. (1959). A Public Development Programme for Thailand: Report of a Mission Organized by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development at the Request of the Government of Thailand (Baltimore: doi
  3. (1992). A Virtuous Circle Model of Rural – Urban Development: Evidence from a Kenyan Small Town and Its Hinterland’, doi
  4. (2007). Administrative Committee
  5. (2003). Alternative Modern - Development as Cultural Geography’, in doi
  6. (2007). An Everyday Geography of the Global South doi
  7. (2005). Analysing Qualitative Materials’
  8. (2002). Anthropology beyond Culture doi
  9. (1991). Asian Rural Industrialisation: Context, Features, Strategies’
  10. (1994). Authority, Gender and Knowledge: Theoretical Reflections on the Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal’, doi
  11. (2008). Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/afr/ik/ikrept.pdf (Accessed:
  12. (2009). Aviable at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev/
  13. (2007). Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research’, doi
  14. (1990). Behind the Smile: Voices of Thailand (Bangkok:
  15. (2000). Beyond the Search for a Paradigm? Post-Development and Beyond’, doi
  16. (1993). Beyond Urban Bias’, doi
  17. (2003). Building a Postcolonial Archive? Gender, Collective Memory and Citizenship in Post-Apartheid South Africa’, doi
  18. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research’, doi
  19. (1999). Capitals and Capabilities: a Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty’, World Development, doi
  20. (1998). Challenging the Professions: Frontiers for Rural Development (London: doi
  21. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review, November-December
  22. (1995). Commercialization, Nonagricultural Production, Agricultural Innovation, and Economic Development’,
  23. (1992). Confronting Uneven Development in Thailand: The Potential Role of Rural Industries’,
  24. (1997). Contesting the Margins of Modernity: Women, doi
  25. (1986). Context, Meaning and Power in Southeast Asia
  26. (2006). Continuity and Change in Pastoral Livelihoods of Senegalese Fulani’, doi
  27. (1998). Cooperation and Community in Rural Thailand: An Organisational Analysis of Participatory Rural Development (Tokyo: doi
  28. (1999). Cultural Capital’, doi
  29. (2006). Culture and Development in a Globalizing World: Geographies, Actors, and Paradigms (London and doi
  30. (2000). Culture and Development: A Critical Introduction (Oxford: doi
  31. (2006). Culture and Development: Taking Culture Seriously in Development for Andean Indigenous People’, Environment and Planning D: doi
  32. (2004). Culture and Public Action (CA: doi
  33. (2000). Culture and Sustainable Development in the Pacific’
  34. (1991). Culture as a Resource: Four Cases of Self-Managed Indigenous Craft Production doi
  35. (1992). Current Human Settlement Situation in Thailand and Related Policies’, Regional Development Dialogue,
  36. (1996). Deagrarianisation and Rural Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Sectoral Perspective’, World Development, doi
  37. (1982). Decentralization, Recentralization and Popular Participation in Developing Countries: Towards a Framework for Analysis’, Development and Peace,
  38. (2004). Development and Local Knowledge (London: doi
  39. (1984). Development and the Rural-Urban Divide’, doi
  40. (1990). Development Dilemmas in Rural Thailand (Singapore: doi
  41. (2003). Development Fieldwork: A Practical Guide (London: doi
  42. (1981). Development from Above or Below?: The Dialectics of Regional Planning in Developing Countries (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons). 310 Tambon Nong Kwai Local Administrative Office
  43. (1995). Development, the Environment and Social Differentiation in Northern Thailand’, doi
  44. (2009). Development: Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. [Online]. Available at: http://www.livelihoods.org/info/info_guidancesheets.html (Accessed:
  45. (1992). Development”,
  46. (1996). Directions for Oral History in the United States’,
  47. (2006). District Office
  48. (2002). Doing Cultural Geography (London: doi
  49. (2002). Doing Development Research (London:
  50. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide
  51. (1979). Economic and Social Problems (Panha Setthakit lae Sangkhom)’, in Graduate Volunteers’ Office (Samnak Banthit Asa Samak)
  52. (1971). Economic Change in Thailand, doi
  53. (2001). Economics and Culture (Cambridge: doi
  54. (2006). Elite and Specialised Interviewing (Colchester:
  55. (1996). Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls’, doi
  56. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton: doi
  57. (2003). Entering the Field’ doi
  58. (1998). Facing the Storm: Portraits of Black Lives in Rural South Africa (Cape Town: doi
  59. (1984). Family and Work in Rural Societies: Perspectives on Non-Wage Labour doi
  60. (1996). Farming by the Older Generation: The Exodus of Young Labour
  61. (1995). Forces Behind the Growth of Rural Industries in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature and a Case Study from Indonesia’, doi
  62. (2000). Foreword – Cultures Count’,
  63. (2004). Four Decades of Development in Thailand’s Rural Sector and the Role of Government’
  64. (2001). From Agricultural Modernisation to Agri-food Globalisation: The Waning of National Development in Thailand’, Third World Quarterly, doi
  65. (2006). From Root to Leaves, OTOP Thai Way to the World (Bangkok: OTOP Provincial Subcommittee).
  66. (1992). Gender and Economic Development in Thailand’,
  67. (1991). Gifts and Rights: Cautionary Notes on doi
  68. (2004). Growing Up Global: Economic Restructuring and Children’s Everyday Lives (MN: doi
  69. (2008). History and Geography of Identification related to Resource Conflicts and Ethnic Violence in Northern Thailand’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, doi
  70. (1998). Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification’, doi
  71. (2004). How does Culture Matter?’,
  72. (1987). Implicit Policies Affecting Urbanization in Thailand’ in Fuchs,
  73. (2003). in R. Sethakul
  74. (2004). Indigenous Knowledge and Development: A Postcolonial Caution’, Third World Quarterly, doi
  75. (1998). Indigenous Knowledge for Development: A Framework for Action (Knowledge and Learning Centre, Africa Region, World Bank).
  76. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge Inquiries: A Methodologies Manual for Development (Dhaka:
  77. (2000). Indigenous Population and Sustainable Development; Building on Indigenous Approaches to Holistic Development’, World Development, doi
  78. (1999). Insider or Outsider, Both or Neither, Some Dilemmas of Interviewing in a Cross-Cultural Setting’, doi
  79. (1995). Introduction’ to their (eds.) The Cultural Dimension of Development: Indigenous Knowledge Systems (London: doi
  80. (1986). Kanpatthana: Thai Views of Development’,
  81. (2007). Key Indicators 2007: Inequality in Asia (Manila: Asian Development Bank). doi
  82. (1976). Keywords (NY:
  83. (1983). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society doi
  84. (2001). Land and Livelihood: What Do We Know, and What Are the Issues?’
  85. (2006). Layers of Meaning: an Analysis of Definition of Culture’, in
  86. (2003). Livelihoods in Crisis? New doi
  87. (2009). Livelihoods Perspectives and Rural Development’, doi
  88. (2009). Managing Risk and Vulnerability in Asia: A (re)Study from Thailand, 1982-1983 and 2008’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, doi
  89. (1977). Marxism and Literature (Oxford: doi
  90. (1997). Methodological Issues in Overseas Fieldwork: Experiences from Nicaragua’s Northern Atlantic Coast’,
  91. (1997). Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project doi
  92. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation (MN:
  93. (2001). More than the soil: Rural Change in Southeast Asia
  94. (1997). Multiple Trajectories of Rural Industrialisation: An Agrarian Critique of Industrial Restructuring and the New Institutionalism’ doi
  95. Municipality office (2006) Baan Ton Pao Summary Document (Chiang Mai: Tambon Ton Pao Municipality office).
  96. (2006). National Economic and Social Development Plans. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nesdb.go.th/econSocial/devCom/bottombar_copy.htm (Accessed:
  97. (2004). New Thinking about Urban and Rural Development
  98. (1979). Of Neo-Populist Pipe-Dreams: Daedalus in the Third World and the Myth of Urban Bias’, doi
  99. (1993). On the Interpretation of Thai Villages’,
  100. (2007). One Product (OVOP) Movement Information. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ovop.jp/en/index.html (Accessed: 3
  101. (2007). One Village One Product: Strategy for Sustainable Rural Development
  102. (2006). One Village, One Product Movement Spreading Throughout the World (Oita:
  103. (1994). Oral History and the Local Historian (London: doi
  104. (1998). Orality, Memory and Social History in South Africa'
  105. (2002). Participating in Development: Approaches to Indigenous Knowledge doi
  106. (2006). Policy Policies of the government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra 2001-2006. [Online]. Available at: http://www.thaiembdc.org/politics/govtment/policy/54thpolicy/policy_e.html (Accessed:
  107. (1997). Postgraduate Fieldwork in Developing Areas: A Rough Guide (The Developing Areas
  108. (1995). Poverty and Livelihoods: Whose Reality Counts? doi
  109. (1992). Poverty and the Poor’ in
  110. (2007). Poverty Reduction’, Development in Practice, doi
  111. (2004). Practising Human Geography (London:
  112. (1972). Proto-Industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process’, doi
  113. (2003). Putting Ordinary Language to Work; a Min-Max Strategy of Concept Formation in the Social Sciences’, doi
  114. (2000). Putting Postmodernity into Practice: Endogenous Development and the Role of Traditional Cultures in the Rural Development of Marginal Regions’, doi
  115. (2005). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (Thousand Oaks: doi
  116. (2000). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography doi
  117. (2002). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner – Researchers, doi
  118. (2000). Realising Human Rights for
  119. (1999). Reflections and Interviewing Foreign Elites: Praxis, Positionality, Validity, doi
  120. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods (Thousand Oaks: doi
  121. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Thousand Oaks: doi
  122. (2002). Researching Human geography
  123. (1997). Responsible Well-being – A Personal Agenda for Development’, World Development, doi
  124. (2003). Rethinking Development Geographies doi
  125. (1987). Rethinking Development: Modernization, Dependency and Postmodern Politics doi
  126. (1984). Rights and Capabilities’,
  127. (1998). Rural – Urban Interactions, Agriculture and Wealth: a Southeast Asian Perspective’, Progress in Human Geography, doi
  128. (1966). Rural Development in Thailand (Bangkok:
  129. (1984). Rural Development: Focusing on Social Development and Fundamental Necessity Knowledge (Bangkok: Rural Development Textbook Project,
  130. (1999). Rural Development: Principles, Policies and Management doi
  131. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First doi
  132. (1975). Rural Development: Sector Policy Paper (Washington DC: doi
  133. (1988). Rural Development: World Bank Experience 1965-1986 (Washington DC: World Bank Operations Evaluation Study, doi
  134. (1987). Rural Industrialisation and Employment in Asia (New Delhi: International Labour Organisation, Asian Employment Programme).
  135. (1990). Rural Industrialisation in Thailand’, Hull Papers in Developing Area Studies,
  136. (1987). Rural Industrialization in Thailand (Bangkok: National Economic and Social Development Board).
  137. (1990). Rural Linkages and Choice of Technology’, doi
  138. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity
  139. (1992). Rural Livelihoods: Crises and Responses (Oxford:
  140. (1999). Rural Nonagricultural Employment and Poverty doi
  141. (1995). Rural Nonfarm Employment: A Survey’, Policy Research Working Paper 1463 doi
  142. (1996). Rural Poverty in Developing Asia Volume 2: Indonesia, doi
  143. (1992). Rural Poverty in Thailand: Policy Issues and Responses’, Asian Development Review,
  144. (1988). Rural Poverty, Development and the Environment: The Case of Northeast Thailand’, doi
  145. (1994). Rural Transformation and the Future of Work in Rural Asia’,
  146. (1991). Rural-Urban Growth Linkages in India’,
  147. (2005). Rural-Urban Interaction in the Developing World (New York: Routledge). Mahbub ul Haq ‘The Human Development Concept’ in Human Development Report.
  148. (1973). Small is Beautiful: Economics as if people mattered (London: Blond and Briggs).
  149. (1999). Social Capital: Key Sheets for Sustainable Livelihoods
  150. (2001). Social Research Methods doi
  151. (2003). Southeast Asia (Second Edition): The Human Landscape of Modernisation and Development doi
  152. (2000). Southeast Asia: Diversity and Development
  153. (2008). Structure of Thai Economy
  154. (2007). Sufficiency Economy: Thailand’s Operationalised Model of Happiness (Bangkok:
  155. (2004). Sufficiency Economy’, doi
  156. (2004). Sustainable Livelihoods in Practice: Early Applications of Concepts
  157. (1997). Sustainable Livelihoods: Concepts, Principles and Approaches to Indicator Development. [Online]. Available at: http://www.sustainable-livelihoods.com/pdf/sustainblelivelihoodsc-1.pdf (Accessed: 6
  158. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis’,
  159. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century,
  160. (1999). Thai Women in the Global Labor Force: Consumed Desires, Contested Selves (New Brunswick: doi
  161. (2005). Thailand Economic Monitor (Bangkok: World Bank Thailand Office). [Online]. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTHAILAND/Resources/EconomicMonitor/2005nov_econ.pdf (Accessed: 3
  162. (2007). Thailand Human Development Report 2007: Sufficiency Economy and Human Development (Bangkok:
  163. (1980). Thailand: Coping with Structural Adjustment (Washington: World Bank), doi
  164. (1967). Thailand: Social and Economic Studies in Development (Canberra, Australian: National University Press, in association with
  165. (1978). Thailand: Toward a Development Strategy of Full Participation (East Asia and Pacific Regional Office).
  166. (2000). Thailand’s Crisis (Chiang Mai: doi
  167. (1981). The Administration of Economic and Social Development Planning in Thailand’,
  168. (1996). The Agrarian Question and Industrial Dispersal in South Africa Agro-Industrial Linkages through Asian Lenses’, doi
  169. (2004). The Earthscan Reader in Environment: Development and Rural Livelihoods doi
  170. (1994). The Fifth Tiger: A Study of Thai Development Policy (Tokyo: United Nations doi
  171. (1983). The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: doi
  172. (1998). The Life Story Interview (London: doi
  173. (1998). The Oral History Reader doi
  174. (1996). The people of Isan, Northeast Thailand: Missing Out on the Economic Boom?’,
  175. (1995). The Power of Culture – Our Creative Diversity. [Online]. Available at: http://www.powerofculture.nl/uk/archive/report/intro.html (Accessed:
  176. (1996). The Relationship Between Qualitative-Quantitative Research: Paradigm Loyalty Versus Methodological Eclecticism’,
  177. (1997). The Rise of Indigenous Capitalists in Rural Thailand: Profile of Brickmakers in the Central Plains’
  178. (1992). The Rural Non-Farm Economy: Processes and Policies (Geneva: International Labour Office). doi
  179. (2002). The Scramble in Africa: Reorienting Rural Livelihoods’, World Development, doi
  180. (1987). The Standard of Living (Cambridge: doi
  181. (2003). The Territorialisation of Rural Thailand: Between Localism, Nationalism and Globalism’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Goegraphie, doi
  182. (1994). The Thai Countryside in the 1990s’, Southeast Asian Affairs doi
  183. (1993). The Thai Economy in Transition (Cambridge:
  184. (1972). The Thai Economy: Structure, Problems and Policies (Setthakit Thai: Krongsang, Panha lae Nayobai)
  185. (1999). The Thai Economy: Uneven Development and Internationalisation (London and doi
  186. (1999). The Thai Village Economy in the Past (Chiang Mai: doi
  187. (1993). The Thai Village from the Villagers’ Perspective’, in
  188. (1972). The Third National Economic and Social Development Plan 1972-1976 (Bangkok: National Economic and Social Development Board). 306 Nong Kwai Local Administrative Office
  189. (1993). The Village in Perspective: Community and Locality in doi
  190. (1998). The Voice of the Past: Oral History’ doi
  191. (2005). Theories and Practices of Development doi
  192. (2000). This is Thailand (Bangkok:
  193. (1993). Tourism and Rural Handicrafts in Thailand’
  194. (1972). Trends in Economic Development (Naeo Thang Pattana Setthakit)’, in Nartsupha,
  195. (1999). Understanding Languages of Modernization: A Southeast Asian View’, doi
  196. (1996). Uneven Development in Thailand (Hampshire: doi
  197. (1992). Unravelling the Myth of the Subsistence Economy: Textile Production in Nineteenth Century Northern Thailand’, doi
  198. (1981). Urban Bias and Rural Poverty: A Review of Michael Lipton, Why Poor People Stay Poor: A Study of Urban Bias doi
  199. (1989). Urban or Agrarian? The Modern Thai State’, doi
  200. (2006). Using Indigenous Local Knowledge and Literature’ doi
  201. (2003). Using Quantitative Techniques’ doi
  202. (2003). Value Contestations in Development Interventions: Community Development and Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches’, doi
  203. (1979). Village Chiang Mai: Social and Economic Conditions of a Rural Population in Northern Thailand,
  204. (2006). Wellspring of Community Product
  205. (2002). What is the Thai Village?’, in Reynolds,
  206. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last (London: doi
  207. (1977). Why Poor People Stay Poor: A Study of Urban Bias in World Development (London: Temple Smith). doi
  208. (1998). Working with Indigenous Knowledge: A Guide for Researchers

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.