Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Convenient Pigeon Holes? The Classification of Trade Marks in Historical Perspective

By T. Rose

Abstract

The Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks was signed on 15 June 1957. It sets out the procedural requirements for the Nice Classification, a system limited in its substantive requirements towards harmonisation. This has directly resulted in differences in its scope and meaning, within the context of national registrations, between States party to, or making use of, the Agreement. The history of classification of trade marks places the origins and gradual conceptualisation of classification alongside the development of substantive trade mark law. The legal analysis on the Nice Agreement, together with the case studies of Mexico, Turkey, Japan, Canada and the UK highlights the differences in its interpretation by economically disparate countries. It is argued that the intended function of trade mark classification has become lost in the translation of the Nice Agreement into diverse legal systems. “But when all has been said, it is not easy in any human activity to lay down a rule so well grounded on reasoned argument that Fortune fails to maintain her rights over it.” 1 Michel De Montaigne (1533-1592

Topics: law, com
Publisher: Bournemouth University
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk:3710

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). [online]. doi
  2. (1996). A Practical Guide to Trade Mark Law. 2nd ed.
  3. (2002). All Mixed Up? The Court of Appeal In Reliance Water Controls V Altecnic. Trademark World,
  4. (2003). Classification - Current Issues [online]. Newport, SW: Trade Marks Registry. Available from: http://www.patent.gov.uk/tm/reference/classcurrent.htm [Accessed
  5. (2003). English Trade Mark Law in the Eighteenth Century: Blanchard v Hill Revisited - Another ‘Case of Monopolies’? doi
  6. (1999). Harmonising Trade Mark Law in Europe. Intellectual Property Quarterly,
  7. (2004). International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks under the Nice Agreement [online]. WIPO. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/classifications/en/nice/about/nice.html [Accessed
  8. (2002). Japan – Retail Services Denied Protection Under Japan’s Trademark Law. Trademark World,
  9. (2002). Legal and Technical Implications of Canadian Adherence to the Madrid Protocol [online]. Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Available from: http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/sc_mrksv/cipo/tm/madrid_index-e.html [Accessed
  10. (1990). Madrid Agreement: Will Reform Proposals Attract More Members? European Intellectual Property Review,
  11. (2000). Office For Harmonisation
  12. (2004). Problems of Reclassification. Managing Intellectual Property,
  13. (2003). Signatory Boom For Treaties. Trademark World,
  14. (1925). The Historical Foundations of the Law Relating to TradeMarks. doi
  15. (1994). The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks as Applied under the Protocol. European Intellectual Property Review,
  16. (1927). The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection. doi
  17. (1993). The Selection and Registration of Trade-marks.
  18. (1992). Trademarks: a comparative guide for 215 countries.
  19. (1997). Turkey: Trade Marks – Classification System – Matters of Which to be Wary. European Intellectual Property Review,
  20. (1990). WIPO News - Harmonisation of Trade Mark Law. European Intellectual Property Review,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.