Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An Exploration of Real-World Analogical Problem Solving in Novices.

By Christopher Bearman, Linden J. Ball and Thomas C. Ormerod


Despite the postulated importance of analogising to human cognition, the study of analogical problem solving in the laboratory has found disappointing results. Providing an analogue to a participant prior to asking them to solve a problem gives only a small benefit at best. Recently, studies outside the laboratory have suggested that experts frequently use analogies in realworld situations. It is less clear whether novices can also spontaneously invoke and use analogies to solve realistic problems. In the current investigation, undergraduates were observed solving a large-scale management problem over two weeks. It was found that many analogies were produced (on average 4.6 per one-hour session), and that 77% of these analogies reflected a structural rather than a superficial mapping between a base and a target. It was also determined that 56% of these structural analogies involved non-trivial mappings of higher-order relations. Further, it was found that analogies were drawn to serve two different purposes: problem solving and illustration. In generating illustrative analogies, participants frequently made superficial mappings, but when generating analogies to solve problems, they never made purely superficial mappings

Year: 2002
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Lancaster E-Prints

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). Accessing source information in analogical problem-solving. doi
  2. (1983). Analogical connections: The essence of creativity. doi
  3. (1980). Analogical Problem Solving. doi
  4. (1992). Analogical reasoning and conceptual complexity in cognitive development. doi
  5. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. doi
  6. (2001). Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals. doi
  7. (2000). Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: Analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision processes, doi
  8. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. doi
  9. (1992). Delta Dairies. European Case Clearing House Collection.
  10. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited. doi
  11. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. doi
  12. (1986). Induction, Processes of inference, learning and discovery. doi
  13. (2000). Learning and memory: An integrated approach.
  14. (1992). Learning from case studies (2 nd Edn.).
  15. (1995). Life story research. In doi
  16. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. doi
  17. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. doi
  18. (1999). Petrol retailing in Europe: The UK market. European Case Clearing House Collection.
  19. (1996). Priming, analogy and awareness in complex reasoning. doi
  20. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In doi
  21. (1977). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage
  22. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. doi
  23. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In doi
  24. (1999). Sources of power: How people make decisions. doi
  25. (1983). Structure-Mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. doi
  26. (2001). The analogy paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In
  27. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy. doi
  28. (1999). The theory and practice of knowledge brokering: Case studies of continuous innovation.
  29. (1993). The use of analogy in legal argument: Problem similarity, precedent and expertise. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Making Processes, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.