Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Representing, resisting and reproducing ethnic nationalism: Official UK Labour Party representations of ‘multicultural Britain’.

By Susan Condor


In this paper I argue that any attempt to resist racialization needs to take account of the complex and often paradoxical ways in which notions of race and culture come to be articulated in conjunction with categories of nation, state and society. In the first half of the paper I consider some of the strategies used by UK Labour Party Ministers to counter ethnic representations of British identity by promoting the fact and value of post-Imperial Britain as a ‘multicultural society’. In the second half of the paper I consider some tensions within these arguments. First, I consider how the rhetorical formulations that the speakers use to justify the political project of UK multiculturalism implicitly presuppose a natural order in which nations are populated by a racially and culturally homogenous people. Second, I consider how their prescriptive recommendations that ‘we’ recognize and celebrate ‘our’ ethnic diversity do not in practice seek to establish the ultimate fiction of ethnic nationalism as a general ideological principle, but rather treat the fact and value of ethnic diversity as a uniquely British asset or virtue, in a manner that closely echoes the selfcelebratory rhetoric of British imperialism. Despite the claim that an ethnically neutral understanding of ‘British society’ will necessarily also entail a rejection of ‘insular nationalism’, paradoxically these banally nationalized liberal utopian discourses of multiculturalism are in some respects more Anglocentric and less internationalist than the explicitly racialized versions of British identity promoted by the far right British National Party

Year: 2006
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Lancaster E-Prints

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). (in press) ‘Everybody’s entitled to their own opinion’: Ideological dilemmas of liberal individualism and active citizenship. doi
  2. (2006). (in press) Temporality and collectivity: Diversity, history and the rhetorical construction of national entitativity doi
  3. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? Personality and doi
  4. (1995). Colonial Desire: Hybridity in theory, culture and race London: doi
  5. (1996). Community beyond tradition.
  6. (2000). Critical Social Psychology (pp.111-146). London: Sage.
  7. (2001). Critical Social Psychology London: Sage (pp. doi
  8. (1921). How the Empire Grew: The story of British colonisation London: RTS
  9. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics. doi
  10. (1998). Island Stories: Unravelling Britain London: Verso
  11. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship. doi
  12. (1978). On Liberty, Liberalism and Essential Contestability. doi
  13. (1999). Practising identities: Power and Resistance Basingstoke: Macmillan (pp 213-238)
  14. (1940). The Pulse of Democracy doi
  15. (1987). There Ain’t no Black in the Union Jack London: Hutchinson doi
  16. (2006). We are an island’: The use of geographical imagery to manage national identity, civility and citizenship in Scotland and in England. doi
  17. (2000). Who Do We Think We Are?: Imagining the New Britain Harmondsworth: Penguin Alexander,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.