Location of Repository

What we mean, what we think we mean, and how language can surprise us

By Barry C. Smith


In uttering a sentence we are often take to assert more than its literal meaning - though sometimes we assert less. This phenomenon is taken by many to show that what is said or asserted by a speaker on an occasion is a contextually enriched or developed version of the semantic content of the words uttered. I argue that we can resist this conclusion by recognizing that what we think we are asserting, or take others to assert, involves selective attention to just one of the ways a sentence could be true and neglects others. In most conversations people converge in their selective attention and communication is not impaired. Though in the case of sentences involving predicates of personal taste, people's attention to aspects of what is claimed differs and this can lead to intractable disputes. I offer a diagnosis of such disputes where speakers can disagree about the same claim and both be right

Topics: phil
Publisher: Palgrave
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:598
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/598/1... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.