Location of Repository

Don’t touch! hands off! art, blindness and the conservation of expertise

By Fiona Candlin

Abstract

The embargo on touching in museums is increasingly being brought into question, not least by blind activists who are calling for greater access to collections. The provision of opportunities to touch could be read as a potential conflict between established optic knowledge and illicit haptic experience, between the conservation of objects and access to collections. Instead I suggest that touch is not necessarily other to the museum; rather, the status of who does the touching and knowing is crucial and not the use of touch per se. It is expert territory and vested academic interests that are at stake here. Using Bruno Latour’s (1993) conceptions of hybrid networks and purified zones of academic practice, I then explore what the unacknowledged existence of touch means for museums and for notions of authority more generally. I suggest that if the apparent boundaries of disciplines are unconvincing in practice, then the possibility of expert knowledge is seriously undermined. Blind people’s demand for access through touch is not then a challenge of one paradigm to another but implicitly questions the accreditation of authority itself. As such it forms part of a wider institutional shift with regard to expertise and an increased need for negotiating between different conceptual frameworks. The ocularcentric bias of museums is increasingly being questioned by blind and visually impaired visitors who emphasize touch as a learning and aesthetic experience. This challenge is contentious not least because it ostensibly brings the individuals’ rights of access into direct conflict with museum conservation. I argue that concerns over conservation can, however, mask and serve to legitimate preconceptions about who should have access to collections; what counts as damage or dirt; and the means by which art and artefacts can be understood or enjoyed. It is expertise rather than the conservation of objects which is at stake. This article suggests that in campaigning for access through touch, blind people physically move beyond the barriers which reserve contact for the museum elite and simultaneously establish the viability of learning in a way that is not sanctioned by the art historical community. Thus resistance to touch in museums is not so much a concern for preservation as a defence of territory and expertise

Topics: hafvm
Publisher: Sage Journals
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bbk.ac.uk.oai2:775

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001). Blindness: A History of Mental Image in Western Thought. London and doi
  2. (1994). Embodiment and Experience: The existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge: doi
  3. (1994). Foreign Bodies. London and doi
  4. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide’, in Lash et al Risk, Environment, Modernity: Towards a new ecology, doi
  5. (1993). Memoirs of the Blind, The Self Portrait and Other Ruins. Chicago and London:
  6. (2000). Modality and Mind‟, doi
  7. (2001). Modality Specificity in Cognition: The Case of Touch‟ doi
  8. (2000). Museums and the visually impaired: the spatial politics of access‟, doi
  9. (2001). Plan 2001/2 to 2002/3 Candlin,
  10. (1966). Purity and Danger, An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London and New York: Routledge Gardner, Howard (1993b) Multiple Intelligences: the theory in practice,
  11. (1999). Sight Unseen. Newhaven and London:
  12. (1982). Social Touching’ in William Schiff and Emerson Foulke (eds.) Tactual perception: a sourcebook, Cambridge:
  13. (1914). The Aesthetic Hypothesis’, pp 67-74 in Frascina, Francis and Harrison, Charles (eds)
  14. (2000). The Learning Power of Museums – A Vision for Museum Education London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport Anderson D
  15. (2002). The Unsightly: Touching the Parthenon Freize‟, doi
  16. (2000). Touch, Representation and Blindness. doi
  17. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.