Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Alignment of academic and industrial development needs for quantity surveyors: the views of industry and academia

By Srinath Perera, John Pearson, Simon Robson and Damilola Ekundayo

Abstract

Education and training of Quantity Surveyors (QS) is subjected to conflicting pressures; firstly from Academic Institutions, which seek to address the academic learning of students; secondly from Industry, which is the graduate employer and thirdly the Professional Body, the regulator of the profession. This can cause tensions between these main stakeholders resulting in greater levels of employer and graduate dissatisfaction and obstacles to early career development of the Quantity Surveying graduate. These problems are further exacerbated in the current economic recession. The research investigates the changing developmental needs of QS within a post recession industrial environment. These must satisfy the aspirations of industrial, academic and professional stakeholders such as the RICS. The RICS provide a comprehensive list of basic, core and optional competencies for the QS. These were comprehensively reviewed to provide the basis for the survey questionnaires with the use of an Expert Forum and literature. Two detailed surveys were conducted; one to obtain views of the industry and the other targeting academia with respect to the RICS QS competencies and the debate of “training versus education”. The research revealed that the stakeholders, mainly the employers and academics, hold diverse views of the development needs for graduate QS. There is wide spread variation in the interpretations, the expected levels of attainment and the perceptions of the level of actual achievement of competencies by graduate QSs. The research proposes a framework that enables to define expectations, ambitions, and practical constraints in QS education that will lead to better understanding, effective collaboration and greater satisfaction in producing a Quantity Surveying graduate who will be seen as fulfilling the requirements of all stakeholders

Topics: K200, K900, X300
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:nrl.northumbria.ac.uk:7129

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2001). (2001-2008), UNN Returns Annual 1st Destination returns from the University of Northumbria to RICS Partnership Accreditation Board
  2. (2011). Alignment of Professional, Academic and Industrial Development Needs for Quantity Surveyors: Post Recession Dynamics”, RICS Education Trust funded research report,
  3. (2002). Commercial Management in Construction,
  4. (2001). Expert Opinions in Forecasting: Role of the Delphi Technique’, In: Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook of Researchers and Practitioners, doi
  5. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size
  6. (1991). Quantity Surveying 2000, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors
  7. (2010). Requirements and competencies’, RICS Education and Qualification Standards,
  8. (2009). RICS Employability Threshold Consultation Document: letter to Partner Institutions’,
  9. (1983). The Future Role of the Chartered Quantity Surveyor’,
  10. (1971). The Future Role of the Quantity Surveyor’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.