Location of Repository

Towards a team-based, collaborative approach to embedding e-learning within undergraduate nursing programmes

By Robin J. Kiteley and Graham Ormrod


E-learning approaches are incorporated in many undergraduate nursing programmes but there is evidence to suggest that these are often piecemeal and have little impact on the wider, nurse education curriculum. This is consistent with a broader view of e-learning within the higher education (HE) sector, which suggests that higher education institutions (HEIs) are struggling to make e-learning a part of their mainstream delivery (HEFCE, 2005). This article discusses some of the challenges that face contemporary nurse education and seeks to account for reasons as to why e-learning may not be fully embedded within the undergraduate curriculum. These issues are considered within a wider debate about the need to align e-learning approaches with a shift towards a more student focused learning and teaching paradigm. The article goes on to consider broader issues in the literature on the adoption, embedding and diffusion of innovations, particularly in relation to the value of collaboration. A collaborative, team-based approach to e-learning development is considered as a way of facilitating sustainable, responsive and multidisciplinary developments within a field which is constantly changing and evolving

Topics: RT, LB2300
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:4849

Suggested articles



  1. (2007). A Framework for Transition: Supporting ‘Learning to Learn’ doi
  2. (2008). A Model for Enhancing Online Course Development.
  3. (2006). An exploration of on-line access by nonDrummond, doi
  4. (2007). An exploratory study of webenhanced learning in undergraduate nurse education. doi
  5. (2008). Available at: Accessed: 30
  6. (2008). Available at: Accessed: 7 doi
  7. (2003). Boomers, Gen-Xers & Millennials: Understanding the New Students.
  8. (2006). Building trust and shared knowledge in communities of e-learning practice: collaborative leadership in the JISC eLisa and CAMEL lifelong learning projects. doi
  9. (2004). Challenging hierarchies: The impact of e-learning. doi
  10. (2008). Critical issues for e-learning delivery: what may seem obvious is not always put into practice. doi
  11. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning and institutional change—some organisational perspectives on campus-wide e-learning. doi
  12. (2006). Deconstruction, confusion and frequency: surveying technology use by vocational teachers. Australian Vocational Education and Training
  13. (2004). Developing Innovation in Online Learning: An Action Research Framework. Routledge Falmer, doi
  14. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Millbank Quarterly. doi
  15. (2002). Discipline-based study skills support for first-year undergraduate students. Active Learning doi
  16. (2007). Does elearning have to be so awful? (Time to mashup or shutup). doi
  17. (2006). Doing away with study skills. doi
  18. (2002). E-learning and educational diversity. doi
  19. (2005). E-learning in nursing education: Lessons learnt? doi
  20. (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. doi
  21. (2007). E-learning: Is this teaching at students or teaching with students? doi
  22. (2008). Editorial Introduction: BJET special issue on best practice or situated action: the organisation of technology enhanced learning. doi
  23. (2003). Effective change management in higher education. doi
  24. (2003). Embedding learning technology institutionally. Senior Management Briefing Paper Key Issues Series: Strategy and Policy,
  25. (2005). Experiences of online learning: students’ perspective. doi
  26. (2008). Factors influencing the utilisation of e-learning in post-registration nursing students/ Nurse Education Today doi
  27. (2005). Faculty attitudes toward web-based instruction may not be enough: limited use and obstacles to implementation. doi
  28. (2005). Flying not flapping: a strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education institutions. doi
  29. (2002). Global network explores diversity and opportunity in nurse education. doi
  30. (2008). Governmentality, student autonomy and nurse education. doi
  31. (2005). HEFCE Strategy for E-Learning 2005/12.
  32. (1999). Hierarchies and Cliques in the Social Networks of Health Care Professionals: Implications for the Design of Dissemination Strategies. doi
  33. (2004). Implementing a learning technology strategy: top-down strategy meets bottom-up culture. doi
  34. (2001). Influence of teacher beliefs on flexible learning innovation. doi
  35. (2004). Information technology in health professional education: why IT matters. doi
  36. (2006). Learning differently: E-learning in nurse education,
  37. (2006). National Workforce Group/Department of Health,
  38. (2007). Negotiating the Path from Curriculum Design to E-Learning Course Delivery: A Study of Critical Success Factors for Instructional Systems Design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science “Creating new learning experiences on a global scale, doi
  39. (1997). Nurse teachers’ perceptions of information technology: a study of nurse teachers in Northern Ireland. doi
  40. (2004). Nurses’ use of online clinical evidence. doi
  41. (2006). of the DfES estrategy in schools and colleges.
  42. (2001). Online learning in an undergraduate nursing program: the perceptions of the learning technology mentors.
  43. (2002). Online learning: enhancing nurse education? doi
  44. (2006). Organisational Issues for e-learning. Critical success factors as identified by HE practitioners. doi
  45. (2005). Promoting practical clinical management learning: the current situation about Information and Communications Technology capability development in student nurses. doi
  46. (2005). Putting post-registration nursing students on-line: Important lessons learned. doi
  47. (2007). Retention and application of information technology skills among nursing and midwifery students. doi
  48. (2008). Risk: the ethics of a creative curriculum. doi
  49. (2001). Seeing the Forest for the Trees’: Towards a Framework for Effective Change Research doi
  50. (2003). Self-directed learning in nurse education: a review of the literature. doi
  51. (2001). Selfdirected learning: faculty and student perceptions.
  52. (2004). Shrouded in the mists of someone else’s vision’ – Teachers using learning technology in post-compulsory education.
  53. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: doi
  54. (2007). Staffing and supporting a new online initiative.
  55. (2001). Teaching study skills and supporting learning.
  56. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. doi
  57. (2006). The CAMEL project: collaborative approaches to the management of e-learning. JISC infoNet online publication. Available at: Accessed:
  58. (2006). The development and evaluation of the use of a virtual learning environment (Blackboard 5) to support the learning of pre-qualifying nursing students undertaking a human anatomy and physiology module. doi
  59. (2003). Trust, collaboration, e-learning and organisational transformation. doi
  60. (2006). Using a virtual learning environment to address one problem with problem based learning. doi
  61. (2002). Using cooperative learning strategies to teach implications of the Nurse Practice Act. doi
  62. (2007). Using the WWW to teach undergraduate nurses clinical communication. doi
  63. (2007). Web 2.0 technologies for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: an online survey. doi
  64. (2002). What do learning technologists do? doi
  65. (2003). When absorptive capacity meets institutions and (e)learners: adopting, diffusing and exploiting e-learning in organizations. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.