[FIRST PARAGRAPHS] Why do human beings make and accept promises? What human interest is served by
this procedure? Many hold that promising serves what I shall call an information
interest, an interest in information about what will happen. And they hold that human
beings ought to keep their promises because breaches of promise threaten this interest.
On this view human beings take promises seriously because we want correct
information about how other human beings are going to act. Some such view is taken
for granted by most philosophical accounts of promissory obligation. I agree that
human beings do want such information and that they often get it by accepting
promises. But I doubt that promising exists because it serves this information interest.
I shall argue that promising exists because, at least when it comes to each
other’s actions, human beings often have what might be called an authority interest: I
often want it to be the case that I, rather than you, have the authority to determine
what you do. If you promise me a lift home, this promise gives me the right to
require you to drive me home; in that sense, it puts me in authority over you. So much
is obvious. What I claim is that human beings often want such authority for its own
sake (not just to facilitate prediction or co-ordination). I often have an interest in
having the right to determine whether you’ll give me a lift, over and above any
interest I have in knowing what you (or we) will actually do. And I claim that
promising exists because it serves this authority interest
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.