Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Performativity and professional development: the gap between policy and practice in the English further education sector

By Kevin Orr

Abstract

The New Labour government identified the further education (FE) sector as a vehicle to deliver its central policies on social justice and economic competitiveness in England, which has led to a torrent of initiatives that have increased central scrutiny and control over FE. Although the connections between social justice, economic competitiveness and education are hegemonic in mainstream British politics, they are unfounded. Therefore, FE can only fail to deliver fully the government's central programme. Thus, a gap exists between policy initiatives and practice in colleges even, paradoxically, where reforms are ostensibly successful. In order to illustrate this gap and how it is maintained this paper considers one specific reform: the statutory obligation for teachers in English FE colleges to undertake 30 hours of continuing professional development (CPD) annually. Evidence from small-scale exploratory research suggests that this initiative has had little impact on patterns of CPD, though the government's quantifiable targets are being systematically met. This paper argues that a symbiosis of performativity has evolved where the government produces targets and colleges produce mechanisms to 'evidence' their achievement, separate to any change in practice and thus maintaining the gap between policy and practice

Topics: LB2300, L1
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.hud.ac.uk:7538

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). Breaking the Consensus: lifelong learning as social control doi
  2. (2008). DIUS 2008-09 business plan at a glance: investing in our future.
  3. (1998). Education and Employment (DfEE) doi
  4. (2006). Education and Skills (DfES) doi
  5. (2001). Education for Industry: a complex technicism. doi
  6. (2001). Education in a post-welfare society. doi
  7. (2008). Education, globalisation and the knowledge economy A Commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme London:
  8. (1999). Further Education National Training Organisation (FENTO).
  9. (2007). How policy impacts on practice and how practice does not impact on policy. doi
  10. (2008). Improving Learning, Skills and Inclusion: The impact of policy on post-compulsory education. doi
  11. (1999). Labour, Learning and the Economy: a 'policy sociology' perspective Cambridge doi
  12. (2005). Learning and Skills- the agenda for change: The Prospectu.s Coventry:
  13. (2008). Lifelong Learning UK (LLUK) 2008d. Website home page available at www.lluk.org.uk accessed 28
  14. Lifelong Learning UK (LLUK) 2008e. Workforce Strategy for the Further Education Sector in England 2007-2012: Implementation Plan.
  15. (1999). Managing ambiguity: between markets and managerialism—a case study of middle managers in further education. doi
  16. (2007). Modernisation’ and the role of policy levers in the learning and skills sector doi
  17. (2003). New Labour’s double shuffle. Soundings. Available on-line at: http://www.lwbooks.co.uk/journals/articles/nov03.html accessed 16
  18. (2006). New overarching professional standards for teachers, tutors and trainers in the lifelong learning sector
  19. (2001). Professionalism and trust – the future of teachers and teaching, A speech by the secretary of state for education to the social market foundation, 12 November,
  20. (2006). Prosperity for All in the Global Economy: world class skills, Final Report. London: The Stationery Office.
  21. (2003). Re-thinking trust in a performative culture: the case of education doi
  22. (2005). Realising the Potential: a review of the future role of further education colleges.
  23. (2008). Room for improvement? The impact of compulsory professional development for teachers in England’s further education sector. doi
  24. (2004). The ‘FENTO Fandango’: national standards, compulsory teaching qualifications and the growing regulation of FE college teachers, doi
  25. (2008). The Education Debate. doi
  26. (2007). The heart of what we do’: policies on teaching, learning and assessment in the new learning and skills sector. doi
  27. (2007). Translating national standards into practice for the initial teaching of Further Education (FE) teachers in England. doi
  28. (1999). Under new management: changing conceptions of teacher professionalism and policy in the further education sector. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.