Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis
Introduction
We report the experiences of 25 Italian centers,
analyzing intra- and periprocedural complications of endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Silk (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France) and pipeline embolization devices (EV3 Inc, Irvine California).
Methods
Two hundred seventy-three patients with 295 cerebral
aneurysms, enrolled in 25 centers in Italy and treated
with the new flow-diverter devices, were evaluated; 142
patients were treated with Silk and 130 with pipeline (in
one case, both devices were used). In 14 (5.2 %) cases
devices were used with coils. Aneurysm size was >15 mm
in 46.9 %, 5–15 mm in 42.2 %, and <5 mm in 10.8 %.
Aneurysm locations were supraclinoid internal carotid artery
(ICA) in 163 cases (55.2 %), cavernous ICA in 76
(25.7 %), middle cerebral artery in 11 (3.7 %), PCoA in 6
(2 %), and ACoA in 2 (0.7 %); the vertebrobasilar system
accounted for 32 cases (10.8 %) and PCA in 5 (1.7 %).
Results
Technical adverse events occurred with 59 patients
(21.6 %); 5 patients died after ischemic events, 10 to hemorrhagic complications, and 1 from external ventricular
drain positioning. At 1 month, morbidity and mortality rates
were 3.7 % and 5.9 %, respectively
Conclusion
Our retrospective study confirms that morbidity
and mortality rates in treatment with FDD of unruptured
wide-neck or untreatable cerebral aneurysms do not differ
from those reported in the largest series
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.