[FIRST PARAGRAPH]\ud The women of Beowulf have enjoyed extensive study in recent years, but one has\ud escaped the limelight: the only daughter of Hygelac, king of the Geats and Beowulf’s\ud lord. But though this daughter is mentioned only fleetingly, a close examination of\ud the circumstances of her appearance and the words in which it is couched affords\ud new perspectives on the role of women in Beowulf and on the nature of Hygelac’s\ud kingship. Hygelac’s only daughter is given as part of a reward to Hygelac’s retainer\ud Eofor for the slaying of the Swedish king Ongentheow. Beowulf refers to this reward\ud with the unique noun ofermaðmas, traditionally understood to mean ‘‘great\ud treasures’’. I argue, however, that ofermaðmas at least potentially means ‘‘excessive\ud treasures’’. Developing this reading implies a less favourable assessment of Hygelac’s\ud actions here than has previously been inferred. I argue further that the excess in\ud Hygelac’s treasure-giving derives specifically from his gift of his only daughter, and\ud the consequent loss to the Geats of the possibility of a diplomatic marriage through\ud which they might end their feud with the Swedes. A reconsideration of Hygelac’s\ud only daughter, then, offers new perspectives on the semantics of ofermaðum, on\ud Hygelac’s kingship, and on women in Beowulf
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.