Roles for trainers and trainees in computer-mediated courses

Abstract

These days many people subscribe to the view that the teacher or teacher-trainer’s role should principally be that of facilitator, rather than “fountainhead of knowledge” Greater equality between trainers and trainees is regarded as beneficial to the learning process; it empowers trainees to select their own learning styles and question received wisdom, whilst it also permits trainers to step back from centre stage to a position where they can observe the learning process. Computer-mediated conferencing (cmc), apart from its value as a means of distance learning, offers opportunities for trainer-trainee equality that are unimaginable in the face-to-face classroom. Participants need not, and often, because of relative anonymity cannot, defer to those belonging to a more dominant age group, gender or race. Thus ideas and issues that might not be voiced in a conventional learning situation can find a forum. This article identifies and discusses the relevant design features of computer-mediated courses for pre-service and in-service teacher training, and discusses some of the strengths and weaknesses of a medium that offers participants a more equal voice