Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What do students learn about functions? : a cross cultural study in England and Malaysia

By Md. Nor Bakar

Abstract

This research study investigates the concept of function developed by a sample of\ud secondary and university students in England and Malaysia studying mathematics as\ud one of their subjects. It shows that whilst students may be able to do the 'mechanical'\ud parts of this concept, their grasp of the 'theoretical' nature of the function concept may\ud be tenuous and inconsistent.\ud The hypothesis is that students develop 'prototypes' for the function concept in much\ud the same way as they develop prototypes for concepts in everyday life. The definition\ud of the function concept, though given in the curriculum, proves to be inoperative, with\ud their understanding of the concept reliant on properties of familiar prototype examples:\ud those having regular shaped graphs, such as x2 or sinx, those often encountered\ud (possibly erroneously), such as a circle, those in which y is defined as an explicit\ud formula in x, and so on.\ud The results of the study in England revealed that even when the function concept was\ud taught through the formal definition, the experiences which followed led to various\ud prototypical conceptions. Investigations also show significant misconceptions. For\ud example, three-quarters of a sample of students starting a university mathematics course\ud considered that a constant function was not a function in either its graphical or algebraic\ud forms, and three quarters thought that a circle is a function.\ud The extension of the study in Malaysia was made with the hypothesis that there is a\ud significant difference between the concept as perceived to be taught and as actually\ud learned by the students. Although the intended curriculum emphasises conceptual\ud understanding, in the perceived curriculum (curriculum as understood by the teachers),\ud only 45% of the teachers follow this approach. The tested curriculum as reflected in the\ud public examination questions, only emphasises the procedural skills and the results of\ud the learned curriculum show that learning of functions is more consistent with the\ud theory of prototypical learning. Students in Malaysia develop their own idiosyncratic\ud mental prototypes for the function concept in much the same way as those students in\ud the UK

Topics: LB, QA
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:4006

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. 1932:The Fundamentals of Learning. doi
  2. 1966: Toward a Theory of Instruction .. doi
  3. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. doi
  4. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development", doi
  5. (1977). A Critical Review of Malaysia's Modem Mathematics Programme at the Lower Secondary School Level, Unpublished
  6. (1970). A cross-sectional study of the development of the mathematical co~?ept of a fu~ction in secondary schoolchildren of average and above average abIhty. Unpubhshed M.Ed. dissertation,
  7. A note on two basic forms of concepts and concept learning", doi
  8. (1982). Accomoda~on of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change",
  9. (1969). An Analysis of Stages in the Attainment of a Concept of a Function. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis.
  10. an~ Cocchiarella M.,1986: "An empirically based instructional design theory for teachlng concepts".
  11. (1971). Building up Mathematics (Fourth Edition) London:
  12. (1981). Children's Understanding o/Mathematics 11-16.
  13. (1973). Comments on Mathematical Education." doi
  14. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function", doi
  15. (1981). Concept image and concept definiti?n i!l mathemati~s with particular reference to limits and continuity",
  16. (1981). Concept Image and Concept Definitio~ in. Mathematics With Particular Reference to Limits and Continuity."
  17. (1983). Concept learning by children using instructional presentation fonns for prototype fonnation and classification - skill development". doi
  18. (1988). Concepts and thought".
  19. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. doi
  20. (1974). Conceptual learning and development - a cognltlve vIew.
  21. (1988). Constructions of arithmetical meanings and strategies. doi
  22. (1989). Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM),
  23. (1991). Curriculum Developme~t in Malaysia.
  24. (1974). Curriculum Development Centre (CDC),
  25. (1989). Development of the pr<:>eess &quot; conception of function by Pre-service Teachers in a Discrete Mathematlcs Course .
  26. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. doi
  27. (1982). Encyclopaedia of Mathematics.
  28. (1988). Epistemological remarks on functions&quot;,
  29. (1988). Exploring Functions: A strategy for Teaching PhYSICS Concepts and Problem- Solving. doi
  30. (1977). From Graphs to Calculus. The Mathematics Curriculum,
  31. (1984). Functions and Equations in High School Algebra. doi
  32. (1986). Functions today and yesterday For t arnlng of
  33. (1980). Functions, Fonnulae and Graphs&quot;.
  34. (1990). Functions, Graphs, Graphing: Tasks, Learning and Teaching, doi
  35. (1936). General Arithmetic for Schools. doi
  36. (1967). Goals for Mathematics Education for Elementary School Teachers,
  37. Greek mathematical tlwught and the origin of algebra.Cambridge,
  38. Group (SMG), 1971-1975: Modern Mathematicsfor Schools, (Books 1-9), Chambers and Blackie.
  39. (1984). Helping children learn mathematics,
  40. (1980). Historical and pedagogical aspects of the definition of function, doi
  41. (1956). History of Analytic Geometry. doi
  42. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function&quot;. doi
  43. (1979). Intelligence, Learning and Action .. doi
  44. (1982). Intuitive functional concepts: a Baseline Study on Intuitions&quot;. doi
  45. (1987). Learning Mathematics: issues, theory and classroom practice.Cassell education Ltd.
  46. (1984). Learning Mathematics: The Cognitive Science Approach to Mathematics Education. doi
  47. (1983). Learning Science: A generative process. doi
  48. (1969). Linear Algebra and Geometry.
  49. (1968). Mathematical Thoughtfrom Ancient to Modern Times Oxford University Press. ' Kleiner I.,
  50. (1982). Mathematics Counts. London: HMSO. D' Ambrosio 19~6: Socio - cultural bases for mathematical education.
  51. (1981). Mathematics Education in its Cultural Context&quot;.
  52. (1991). Mathematics Education: a historical view.
  53. (1975). Mathematics: Syllabus for Secondary Schools, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP), Kuala Lumpur,
  54. (1979). Mathematik Moden Menengah Terbaru (Books 1-5).
  55. (1937). Men of Mathematics. doi
  56. (1973). Modem Mathematics for Malaysia (Fonn 4 text and Teachers' Guide),
  57. (1970). Modern Mathematics for Malaysian Schools. Books 1-3.Pilot Edition.
  58. (1973). Modern Mathematics for Malayszan Schools, Kuala Lumpur,
  59. (1979). Ne~. trends in mathematics teaching, Vol 4, prepared by the InternatIonal Commlslon on Mathematical Instruction (lCMI),
  60. (1930). New Algebra for Schools. doi
  61. (1963). Observations on the Learning of Mathematics.&quot; Science Education News,
  62. (1961). Organisation for European Economic Cooperation, doi
  63. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. doi
  64. (1978). Princ~ple.s of C.ategorization&quot;.
  65. Project (SMP), 1969-1974: Mathematics (Books 1-7, A-H, X,Y,Z). doi
  66. (1946). Proportion, equation, function. Three steps in the development of a concept.
  67. (1990). Psychology and epistemology: match ~r tnlsmatch when apphed to SCIence education ?&quot;
  68. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding&quot;,
  69. (1988). Representations of functions and analogies&quot;,
  70. (1986). Research on Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Two Disciplines of Scientific Inquiry&quot;.
  71. (1982). Some aspects of the functio~ concept in ~ollege studens and junior high school teachers&quot;,
  72. (1971). Some aspects of the growth of the concept of function.
  73. (1984). Some Definitions of the Concept of Function from Bernoulli to BourbakI,&quot;
  74. (1987). Students' Interpretation of Some Concepts of Mathematical Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis,
  75. (1991). Students' Mental Prototypes for Functions and Graphs&quot;, doi
  76. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions&quot;. doi
  77. (1985). Supergraph, (software for BBC compatible computers) Glentop London. '
  78. (1971). Teaching about functions in the secondary school,
  79. (1982). Teaching the concept of function: methods and reasons&quot;. Proceedings of the workshop on functions, organized by the Foundation for Curriculum Development.,
  80. (1983). Teaching the concept of function&quot;.
  81. (1990). Thank you for your letter of 26th
  82. (1989). Thank you very much for your cooperation. I.COUNDON COURT SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE Northbrook Road, Coventry, CV6 2AJ Head:
  83. (1988). The Computer And The Mind: An Introduction To Cognitive Science. doi
  84. (1981). The concept of adaptation and viabil~ty in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge&quot;. In
  85. (1976). The Concept of Function up to the Middle of the 19th Century&quot;.
  86. (1975). The Concept of Function&quot;.
  87. (1970). The Condition of Learning. doi
  88. (1945). The development of Mathematics, 2nd Ed. London Bemeveld
  89. (1983). The function concept in college ~tudents: . linearity, smoothness and periodicity&quot;,
  90. (1946). The history of calculus and its conceptual development,
  91. (1989). The lEA Study of Mathematics 1: Analysis of mathematics curricula. doi
  92. (1987). The Malaysian Mathematics Program: A case study of the difference between design intention and classroom implementation&quot;,
  93. (1971). The Process of Education Revisited.&quot; Phi Delta Kappan 53,pp. Buc.k R.C., 1 ?70: &quot;Functions&quot;.
  94. (1966). The Process of Education. doi
  95. (1923). The psychology of algebra, doi
  96. (1971). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, doi
  97. (1972). The School Mathematics Project: The first ten years. doi
  98. (1985). The social construction of meaning - a significant development for mathematics education?&quot;,
  99. (1982). The teaching of functions and graphs&quot;.
  100. (1969). The treatment of the concept of function.&quot; doi
  101. (1989). Transition from operational to structural conception: The notion of function revisited&quot;.
  102. (1987). Two conceptions of mathematical notions: Operational and structural&quot;.
  103. (1988). Understanding the Function Concept: Some Results of Interviews with Secondary and Tertiary Students&quot;,
  104. (1963). What is Modern Mathematics? Reading: Educational Explorers Ltd.
  105. (1981). What mathematics is currently taught in Malaysian secondary Schools&quot;,
  106. (1987). Women, fire and other dangerous things. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.