Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Representation of viewpoint in opinion discourse : a comparative linguistic investigation of Arabic and British newspapers at time of conflict

By Suzan Muhammed Hasan Zaidan


The study proceeds from a theoretical assumption, that opinion discourse during wartime manipulates readers to respond in certain ways to the events of war and the\ud participants in conflicts. The freedom offered to opinion expression is sometimes abusively exploited particularly when opposing perspectives exist and transpire in the\ud representation of a conflict and which are revealed by the comparative investigation of the opinion discourse of the press of the cultures at war. Such disparity may\ud actually help in inferring the causes and implications of a particular conflict from the common grounds observed between newspapers in representing such a conflict.\ud \ud Therefore, contrary to conventional discourse analysis, this study examines the discourse of opinion articles and editorials of Arabic and British newspapers by applying a linguistically-oriented conceptual framework that uncovers the sociocultural aspects determining each culture's use of language in representing the latest conflicts between the West and the Muslim-Arab worlds.\ud \ud The framework of the study is set to be able to analyse the opinion discourse of Arabic and British newspapers in their representation of the three consecutive conflicts (in the early days of their outbreak): the attack on the World Trade Centre in the US (September 11,2001), the war on Afghanistan (October 07,2001) and the war on Iraq (March 20,2003) and through which the sides in the conflict are\ud incongruently portrayed. The opinion discourse of British and Arabic newspapers following such conflicts was characterised by exhibiting powerful linguistic\ud techniques which are employed to represent the authors' viewpoint and arguments more effectively. These techniques are envisaged in the employment of a rhetorical structure; lexical selectivity and a strategy of enforcement all of which contribute powerfully to manipulative message conveyance. The comparative approach to opinion discourse of Arabic and British newspapers is the centre of discussion.\ud \ud The study reveals historical and religious connections to the current struggles between the West and the Muslim world as it reveals the deeply-rooted ideologies of each culture which are manifested in the emphasis of Our good and Their bad actions and the mitigation of Our bad and Their good attributes that are spontaneously transmitted via the culturally-driven opinion discourse. Disparity in the manner of presenting viewpoints relating to the conflicts and its sides was observed among the newspapers within a single culture as well as similarity was detected across the\ud cultures in question. The reference to the good aspects of the other side is, in some cases, marginally detected which reflects the severe tension in the relationship between the West and Islam

Publisher: School of Languages Cultures and Societies (Leeds)
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). (a). Media Discourse. London -
  2. (1995). (b). Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. doi
  3. A Public BBC", Oral and Written Evidence,
  4. (1997). Advances in Written Text Analysis. London - doi
  5. (1961). AI-Sahäfa al- `4rabiyya: Nash'atuhä wa tatawwuruhä. BeirCit: Där Maktabat alHayät.
  6. (2004). Arab Mass Media: newspapers, radio, and television in Arab Politics. doi
  7. (2004). Argument, war and the role of media in conflict management", doi
  8. (2006). Authors and Readers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters in association with the Open University.
  9. (2002). Barriers and bridges between the Ummah and the West", The Islamic Quarterly,
  10. (2006). Beware the press in times of war", doi
  11. (2006). Comparative literature in the Arab world", doi
  12. (2006). Comparing Media from Around the World.
  13. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: doi
  14. (1998). Discourse Semantics and Ideology". Discourse and Society. doi
  15. (2005). Embedding the truth: Across cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq war"
  16. (2000). Evaluating evaluation in narrative", doi
  17. (2000). Evaluation and organisation in text: the structuring role of evaluative disjuncts",
  18. (2000). Evaluation and the planes of discourse",
  19. (2000). Evaluation: an introduction", doi
  20. (2006). God save us from Islam cliches", doi
  21. (1985). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. doi
  22. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis",
  23. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. doi
  24. (2003). Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, Intelligence and Assessment".
  25. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi
  26. (1985). Linguistic Cohesion in texts. Seoul: Daehan Textbook Print Co.
  27. (1996). Linguistic Criticism. doi
  28. (1994). Mass Media in the Middle East: a Comprehensive Handbook WestportLondon:
  29. (1998). Media and discourse: a critical overview", in Approaches to Media Discourse,
  30. (2000). Media and power in Egypt" in De-Westernizing Media Studies. doi
  31. (1998). Media Literacy. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.
  32. (2002). More than Meets the Eye. An Introduction to Media Studies. London: Arnold; third edition.
  33. (1998). New Media, New Politics?: from Satellite Television to the Internet in the Arab World.
  34. (2006). papers of record are history",
  35. (2005). Persuading People: an Introduction to Rhetoric. Basingstoke: Paigrave Macmillan; second edition.
  36. (1991). Racism and the Press. doi
  37. (2001). Satellite Realm: Transnational Television, Globalization and the Middle East. London: doi
  38. (1999). Tahadiyydt al-i `lam al- 'arabi. "Ammän: Där al-Shurüq.
  39. (1977). Text and Context: Exploratins in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. doi
  40. (2001). Textual Interaction: an Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. doi
  41. (1979). The Arab Press: News Media and Political Process in the Arab World. doi
  42. (2003). The Arabic Language and National Identity: a Study in Ideology. doi
  43. (1969). The Arabic Language: Its Role in History. doi
  44. (1998). The Argument Culture: Moving from Debate to Dialogue.
  45. (1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: doi
  46. (1998). The discourse structure of news stories" in Approaches to Media Discourse,
  47. (2006). The effects of print news photographs of the casualties of war" doi
  48. (2006). The inimitable language of the Qur'zn",
  49. (1991). The Language of News Media. doi
  50. (1998). The Language of Newspapers. doi
  51. (1991). The Linguistic Encyclopedia. doi
  52. (1997). The Media in doi
  53. (1983). The Media in Britain. London Constable. doi
  54. (1992). The Oxford Companion to the English language. Oxford: doi
  55. (2002). The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: the Quest for Effective Communication.
  56. (2004). The United Kingdom" in The Media doi
  57. (1992). The West and the rest", in Formations of Modernity,
  58. (2002). Trauma talk: reconfiguring the inside and outside", doi
  59. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. doi
  60. (1991). Understanding the Media. London -
  61. (1999). War of Words: Language, Politics, and 9/11. doi
  62. (1986). What Uncle Sam Really Wants.
  63. (2004). When Islam and Democracy Meet: Muslims in Europe and in the United States. doi
  64. (1986). Words at work : Lectures on Textual Structure. doi
  65. (1985). Ylm al-ma`äni. Beirut: Där al-Nahda al Ärabiyya.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.