Location of Repository

A longitudinal study exploring the educational experiences and perceptions of students who have been identified as able in the context of a challenging school

By Susan Maria Williamson

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore perceptions of educational experiences held by a group of students identified as able in the context of a challenging school. The study was conducted over a four year period, with a focus on the end of KS3, during KS4, and the end of KS4. The study has explored the notion of ‘ability’, in particular the term gifted. I believe that ‘ability’ is a construct as opposed to the traditional essentialist view -and I have critiqued the mainstream perspective of giftedness and ‘disability/ability’, before considering an alternative, more inclusive approach. \ud The study involved ten students from ‘‘Greengate’’; a small urban school, located in a relatively deprived area of a northern English city. I interviewed each student four times over a period of four years, having set out to rectify an imbalance I had noted in traditional educational research whereby the students were theorized about or represented, rather than asked directly. I chose to give prominence to student voice, and my post-modern method of working with the data, and presenting my findings is partly as a consequence of my wish to avoid the pitfalls of representation.\ud I believe that the method I have used here to present the fragmentary and shifting nature of the truth as it appears to a person over time, complements the philosophy expressed throughout my study, namely that meaning shifts, and there is not one essential truth. \ud Whilst not having a conventional ‘findings’ section, a key strand running through the study is the issue of how and why, able students from lower working-class backgrounds do not tend to take up Higher Education pathways, as was shown with the ten able students in this study, who despite their substantial enrichment provision, and subsequent high attainment have not, yet, (with two exceptions) attended university. \u

Publisher: Department of Education (York)
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:etheses.whiterose.ac.uk:986

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000).Teaching the very able child: developing a policy and adopting strategies. doi
  2. (2003). A Neurodevelopmental approach to learning disabilities: diagnosis and treatment. doi
  3. (1999). A shift of Identity: a journey to integrity in gifted education
  4. (2000). Able and Talented Learners from Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Communities.
  5. (2007). Achievement and Inclusion in Schools . doi
  6. (2000). Arguments for an ‘emancipatory’ research paradigm. In
  7. (2009). Beyond Compare? Thoughts towards an inclusional, fluid, and non-normative understanding of giftedness. In
  8. (2003). Breaking In: Compromises in Participatory Field Research within Closed Institutions. In
  9. (2009). Challenge and creativity; making the links. In
  10. (2000). Changing Paradigms for Gifted Education in the United States. doi
  11. (2000). Conceptions of Giftedness from a MetaTheoretical Perspective. doi
  12. (2004). Conference paper presented at ‘X-city’ Conference for Gifted and Talented
  13. (2002). Editorial -Educating Able Children.
  14. (1998). Educating the very able: current international research.
  15. (1996). Emotional Intelligence. doi
  16. (2004). Ethical protection in research: including children in the debate. In doi
  17. (2004). Ethnography of youth homelessness - Unpublished PhD thesis.
  18. (1997). Eureka: The Cross-Cultural Model for Identification of Hidden Talent Through Enrichment. Roeper Review. doi
  19. (1995). Feminist perspectives empowering research methodologies. doi
  20. (2004). Five Year Strategy for Children and Learners.
  21. (2008). for Gifted and Talented Education. doi
  22. (2002). Gifted and Talented Learners: creating a policy for inclusion. doi
  23. (2001). Gifted Children grown up. doi
  24. (1929). Gifted Children: Their Nature and Nurture. doi
  25. (2000). Gifted Education in Europe: Programs, Practices and Current Research. doi
  26. Hereditary Character and Talent.
  27. (1996). Heredity and giftedness: from eugenics to euphenics. In
  28. (2005). Higher Standards: Better schools for All. (White Paper). London: Stationary Office.
  29. (1999). Highly Able Children. doi
  30. (1958). I doi
  31. (1996). Identification of High Ability and Special Enrichment Programmes for Gypsy Children. In Katzko,M. & Monks,F. (Eds.), Nurturing Talent: Individual Needs and Social Ability - Fourth Conference of the European Council for High Ability (pp.
  32. (2008). Identifying and selecting able students for the NAGTY summer school: emerging issues and future considerations. doi
  33. (1999). Implications of Post-modern Curriculum Theory for the Education of the Talented.
  34. (2007). Improving Learning through Consulting Pupils. doi
  35. (2004). Inclusion and Pupil Achievement.
  36. (2003). Inclusive Education and Teacher Education: a basis for hope or a discourse of delusion. Professorial Lecture at the Institute of education,
  37. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st Century. doi
  38. (1997). Interactive Interviewing: talking about emotional experience. In
  39. (2003). International Trends and Topics of Research on Giftedness and Talent. doi
  40. (2003). Introduction: Giftedness and Talent. doi
  41. (2009). Introduction. In
  42. (1988). Keynes: Open University Press.295 Margolin,L.
  43. (2001). Life History Research in Educational Settings. Milton Keynes:
  44. (2002). Listening to Able Underachievers. doi
  45. (1939). Mein Kampf . London: Hurst and Blackett. doi
  46. (1978). Mind in Society. doi
  47. (2004). New Approaches in Social Research .
  48. (1993). Objectivity in educational research. doi
  49. (1976). Of Grammatology (trans. doi
  50. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. United Kingdom: Penguin edition.
  51. (1993). Perspectives on the Gifted and Talented Disadvantaged in India. In
  52. (1996). Portraits of Resilience: The Urban Life Experience of Gifted Latino Young Men. doi
  53. (2006). Principles of inclusion; implications for able learners. In Smith.C. (Ed.), Including the Gifted and Talented: making inclusion work for more gifted and talented learners. doi
  54. (1997). Promoting Sustainable Development. In
  55. (2009). Psychology for Inclusive Education: New directions in theory and practice. doi
  56. (2005). Secondary school teachers’ pedagogic practices when teaching mixed and structured ability classes. Research Papers doi
  57. (1990). Self-doubt and soft data: social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork. doi
  58. (2008). Social Research Methods. (Third edition) Oxford.
  59. (1998). Special Education: Time to move on?.
  60. Tannenbaum,J.(1992). To be Young and Gifted.
  61. (1993). Teachers investigate their work.
  62. (2009). Teaching the able child ... or teaching the child to be able?” In doi
  63. (2000). Telling Our Own Stories: reflections on family life in a disabling world. Sheffield: Sheffield parents with attitude. NAGC website. www.nagc.ac.uk (Accessed 10/10/2004). NAGTY website. www.nagty.ac.uk (Accessed 4/9/2004).
  64. The ampitheater model: an approach to talent recognition and development. Reaching gifted and talented children: global initiatives - selected papers from the 17 th biennial world conference of the world council for gifted and talented children.
  65. (1994). The Belle Curve.
  66. (2006). The emotional development of gifted and talented children. doi
  67. (2004). The English Model of Gifted and Talented Education: Policy, context, and
  68. (2002). The Micropolitics of Inclusive Education: an ethnography.
  69. (1924). The Physical and Mental Traits of Gifted Children. In Yearbook of National Society for Education.
  70. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education 4-43. doi
  71. (1993). The State of Affairs in Gifted Education in Nigeria. In
  72. (1996). Theorizing Representing the Other. In Kitzinger, doi
  73. (1969). Totality and Infinity (trans. doi
  74. (2006). Triarchically-Based Instruction and Assessment of Sixth-Grade Mathematics in a Yup’ik Cultural Setting in Alaska.
  75. (1996). Troubling the Angels: Women living with HIV/AIDS.
  76. (1911). Two Thousand Normal Children Measured by the Binet Measuring Scale for Intelligence. Pedagogical Seminary 18, doi
  77. (2003). Understanding the national approach to gifted and talented students.
  78. (1993). Using the Schoolwide Enrichment Triad Model to provide Programmes for Underserved Gifted & Talented Students. In doi
  79. (2004). Voices from the Street: An ethnographic of India’s Street Children. Gurgaon Hope India: a publication of the Indian Institute of Social Justice.
  80. (2003). What works for gifted and talented pupils: a review of recent research. Nfer Website. www.nfer.ac.uk Accessed 1/7/2004.
  81. (2007). What works for pupils with literacy difficulties?
  82. (1978). Writing and Difference (trans.
  83. (2007). Writing as interpreting. In

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.