The dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy e and friction velocity u* was studied in reversing and rotating tidal flows in the East China Sea near the northeastern coast of China using ADV and ADCP measurements. The highest near-bottom dissipation rate on a shallow (19m depth) shelf epsilon(nb)similar to 5 x 10(-5)W/kg was associated with the stronger flooding current of the reversing tide and the lowest epsilon(nb)similar to 10(-7) W/kg with the weaker ebb current. The log-layer (ADCP-based) and the skin-layer (ADV-based) near-bottom estimates of friction velocities, u*((log)) and u*((cor)), showed close correspondence for the reversing tidal flow, but when the tidal vector rotated over a sloping bottom u*((log)) was approximately two times larger than u*((cor)). The inapplicability of the Prandtl-Karman log-layer scaling for energetic rotating flow is considered as the major source for this discrepancy. The classical wall-layer parameterization epsilon(nb) = c(0)u*(3)/kappa zeta with c(0)=1 was found to hold well for the reversing tide, but for rotating flow c(0) = 1.5. The scaling for the dissipation rate, epsilon = c(epsilon)e(tr)/L-tr, used in the turbulent kinetic energy (e(tr)) balance equation requires c(epsilon) = 0.06 for the reversing tide, but c(epsilon) = 0.09 for the rotating flow, where the turbulent scale L-tr = kappa zeta and zeta is the distance from the seafloor. Significant departure from the wall layer parameterization was noted when advection of warm water affected the testing site at a sloping shelf (38 m depth), possibly causing convective mixing in addition to boundary-induced turbulence. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.