Location of Repository

The hi-tech detection of Darwin's and Wallace's possible science fraud: big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery

By M Sutton

Abstract

Priority for discoveries is awarded to those who are first to publish. If a scholar writes claiming to have discovered something or originated a theory that has been earlier published, or presented in public by another who got their first, then the peer review process, professional and public disapproval is relied upon to identify and correct the self-serving irregularity. Thereafter, the pretender to the throne of discovery is expected to retract and apologise. If there is evidence that such a counterfeit originator had prior knowledge of their supposedly independent discovery being first discovered by another, the professional repercussions are likely to be catastrophic. This article is about the devastating Big Data facilitated 2014 discovery that the world’s most celebrated and studied natural scientist Charles Darwin, and his lesser known associate Alfred Russel Wallace, more likely than not committed the world’s greatest science fraud by apparently plagiarising the entire theory of natural selection from a book written by Patrick Matthew and then claiming to have had no prior-knowledge of it

Publisher: British Society of Criminology
Year: 2014
OAI identifier: oai:irep.ntu.ac.uk:25927

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1832) ‘Matthew Patrick on Naval Timber and Arboriculture with Critical Notes on Authors who have recently treated the Subject of Planting’, doi
  2. (1860a) ‘Natural selection’,
  3. (anonymous) (1844) Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, doi
  4. (2012). Ancient Alterity in the Andes: A Recognition of Others, doi
  5. Association for the Advancement of Science (1868) Report of the Thirty-Seventh Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Held at Dundee in September 1867, London. doi
  6. Chambers's Edinburgh Journal. William Orr. Saturday doi
  7. (1959). Charles Darwin, Edward Blyth, and the theory of natural selection’,
  8. (2011). Charles Darwin: Mycologist and refuter of his own myth’,
  9. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions, doi
  10. (2007). Corrupted Science: Fraud, Ideology and Politics
  11. (1909). Darwin and geology’, doi
  12. (1979). Darwin and the Mysterious Mr X: New Light on the Evolutionists, doi
  13. (1992). Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud
  14. (2010). Darwin’s five bridges: The way to natural selection’,
  15. (2014). Decolonising Knowledge: Criminology and the World Context. Plenary paper presented at the British Society of Criminology Conference.
  16. (2014). Did Charles Darwin 'borrow' the theory of natural selection?
  17. (1983). Evolution: The History of an Idea, doi
  18. (2011). Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on doi
  19. (2002). In Darwin's Shadow: The Life and Science of Alfred Russel Wallace: A Biographical Study on the Psychology of History, doi
  20. (1959). Just Before Darwin: Robert Chambers and the Vestiges, doi
  21. (1867). Letter in the Dundee Advertiser’, in W.J. Dempster
  22. (1860). Letter to Hooker. 13th April, Darwin Correspondence Project, Available at: http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2758
  23. (1860). Letter to the Gardeners Chronicle. Nature's law of selection’,
  24. (1860). Letter to the Gardeners Chronicle. Nature's law of selection’, Gardeners' Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette,
  25. (2001). Narrow Roads of Gene Land, Volume 2: Evolution of Sex, doi
  26. (2008). Natural selection: It’s not Darwin’s (or Wallace’s) theory’,
  27. (2014). Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret,
  28. (1831). On Naval Timber and Arboriculture; With a critical note on authors who have recently treated the subject of planting, Edinburgh. Adam Black/ London: Longmans and co. doi
  29. (1855). On the law which has regulated the introduction of new species’, doi
  30. (1829). On the Laws of Mortality, and the Intensity of Human Life’, doi
  31. (1861). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, Third Edition, London. doi
  32. (1858). On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection’, doi
  33. (2009). Plastic Fantastic: How the Biggest Fraud doi
  34. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science’, doi
  35. (2013). Roche offers researchers access to all Tamiflu trials’, doi
  36. (2002). Scientific misconduct’, doi
  37. (1803). The Argonautics of Apollonius Rhodius, Vol. III, Dublin: Graisberry and Campbell.
  38. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, doi
  39. (1973). The historical context of natural selection: The Case of Patrick Matthew’, doi
  40. (1955). The Piltdown Forgery, doi
  41. (1984). The Survival of Charles Darwin: A Biography of a Man and an Idea, doi
  42. (2013). White-Collar Crime, doi
  43. (2012). White-Collar Crime: A Text/Reader, doi
  44. (1984). Why one man became the world hero.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.