American discussion concerning differing views of court decision


Zákon č. 226/2000 Z.z. stanovil s účinnosťou od 1. augusta 2000 nasledovné znenie § 32 ods. 1 zákona č. 38/1993 Z.z. o Ústavnom súde Slovenskej republiky: "Sudca, ktorý nesúhlasí s rozhodnutím pléna alebo se­nátu ústavného súdu alebo s ich odóvodnením, má prá­ vo, aby sa jeho odlišné stanovisko pripojilo k rozhod­nutiu. Odlišné stanovisko sudcu sa uverejňuje rovnako ako ostatné časti rozhodnutia."The paper is a summary of arguments presented in the U.S. legal discussion on separate judicial opinion­ writing. The notion of separate opinions include the so called dissenting and concurring opinions: the former express disagreement with the result of a majority de­cision, the latter disagreement only with its reasoning. (Within the text, the term "dissent" is sometimes used as referring to separate opinions in general.

Similar works

Full text


Masaryk University Journals / Časopisy Masarykovy univerzity

Provided original full text link
oaioai:ojs.journals.muni....Last time updated on 10/17/2019

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.