Political authority over extensive territories is a well-known phenomenon of
the ancient world, and one conceptualized already in antiquity through the
image of the succession of empires. Each such politico-spatial order was based
on the successful interrelationship of heterogeneous symbolic and concrete
forms of governance in the context of contingent structural conditions. While
each major empire must be regarded as a singular historical case, the question
nonetheless presents itself of how an awareness of such structures of
political administration were constituted in premodern states. In the
framework of Area B »Mechanisms of Control and Social Spaces« large-scale
phenomena of governance were examined particularly with regard to the forms of
knowledge associated with the organizational implementation of these of
hegemonic structures. This research group investigates the interdependency of
spatial structures and the organization of authority with reference to four
major empires. Brought to light through the analysis of contrasting
interventions into these territories are continuities and discontinuities of
practice within which the spectrum of forms of knowledge as well as the object
of knowledge itself become discernible. The geographic region of investigation
is the Near East. Three ancient Near Eastern case studies, namely the Hittite
and Mittani Kingdoms and the Middle Assyrian Empire, illustrate the region of
Anatolia-Upper Mesopotamia in a dense chronological stratification which
traverses a period lasting circa 500 years. Emerging within this chronotope
both geographically and chronologically are intersections through which
commonalities and differences in the organization of governance are revealed,
not least of all in their spatial conditionality. In contrast, the subproject
in Ancient History dealing with the system of rule of the Imperium Romanum in
the Ancient Near East focuses on the early period of the Principate, with a
special focus on the Palestinian-Syrian realm. In terms of systematics and
chronology, two detailed studies contrast the relatively homogeneous
perspectives of the four above-named empires: the first examines »trade
relations« in the Neo-Babylonian empire of the 1st millennium BCE, and the
second »multiethnicity« in the formation of the ancient Near Eastern empires
of the later 1st millennium BCE. The analysis proceeds via archaeological,
philological, and historical methods and focuses on concrete forms of
political authority as exercised in interdependency with the governed regions
on various scales. Settlement structures, artifacts, and border formations
have been investigated along with a multiplicity of textual genres, including
historical documents such as treaties, but also epigraphic materials, legal,
and commercial documents. Some of the sources are being made accessible and
published for the first time in the framework of these investigations. A web-
supported map project will permit links to be created between geographically
defined discursive horizons and object data such as settlement patterns, areas
of settlement, and texts
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.