Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse

By Xueli Jia, Cathryn M A Glazener, Graham Mowatt, David Jenkinson, Cynthia Fraser, Christine Bain and Jennifer Burr

Abstract

The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comPeer reviewedPostprin

Topics: efficacy, mesh, mesh erosion, NICE, pelvic organ prolapsed, safety, systematic review, RG Gynecology and obstetrics, RG
Year: 1
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s00192-010-1156-7
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/2070
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (30-83) 3/144 NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Dacron graft (NR details); polytetrafluoroethylene, GoreTex (Amid type II), and other type of mesh (NR)
  2. (37-124) Efficacy Safety Wu 2006[61] 212 66 (11) 0/212 212/0 Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Polyethylene tetraphalate, Mersilene (Amid type III); polypropylene (NR trade name); or Gore-Tex NR 15m (0.3-121) Safety
  3. 2.5y (1-5.5) Efficacy Safety Lo 1998[10]
  4. 36m (0-74) Efficacy Safety Bradley 2007[36] 305 NR NR NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Non-absorbable synthetic, xenograft, autologous or cadaveric fascia lata Anti-incontinence: 148/305 1y Efficacy Safety Culligan
  5. 4y (1-13) Efficacy Safety Higgs 2005b[46] 148 58 (10) 24/123 NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Combined mesh, polyproglactine and prolene 1 :1, Vypro; fascia lata; polypropylene, Prolene; polyethylene tetraphalate,
  6. 51m (12-115) Efficacy Safety Griffis 2006[23]
  7. (1993). A new technique of uterine suspension to pectineal ligaments in the management of uterovaginal prolapse.
  8. (2006). A prospective randomized study comparing posterior IVS and sacrospinous suspension for the surgical treatment of uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. doi
  9. (2004). A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effect on urogenital function. doi
  10. (2005). A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy. doi
  11. (1999). A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence. doi
  12. (2004). A survey of the complications of vaginal prolapse surgery performed by members of the Society Of Gynecologic Surgeons. doi
  13. a,b.c Results from the two arms of one/two/four studies were combined 32 Table 2 Median and ranges of mesh erosion rates for sacrocolpopexya,b No. study n/N (%) Median (range) Non-absorbable synthetic mesh
  14. (1998). Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: A comparison. doi
  15. (2006). Abdominal high uterosacral colpopexy and abdominal sacral colpopexy with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. doi
  16. (1992). Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Evolution of operative techniques. doi
  17. (2004). Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. doi
  18. (2005). Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. doi
  19. (2005). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. doi
  20. (1991). Abdominal-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. doi
  21. (2007). Abdominovaginal sacral colpoperineopexy: patient perceptions, anatomical outcomes, and graft erosions. doi
  22. (2007). Anterior intravaginal slingplasty tunneller device for stress incontinence and posterior intravaginal slingplasty for apical vault prolapse: a 2-year prospective multicenter study. doi
  23. (2007). Bowel symptoms in women 1 year after sacrocolpopexy. doi
  24. (2006). Coker A doi
  25. (2004). Comparison of effectiveness of vaginal and abdominal routes in treating severe uterovaginal or vault prolapse.
  26. (2007). Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. doi
  27. (2007). Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation. doi
  28. (2006). Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. doi
  29. (2008). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub3.: 4. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse
  30. Efficacy Safety Hardiman 1996[24]
  31. (1997). Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. doi
  32. (2009). for Health and Clinical Excellence, doi
  33. (2005). Haberal A doi
  34. (2005). High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh. doi
  35. (2005). Incidence and management of abdominal sacrocolpopexy mesh erosions. doi
  36. (2007). Infracoccygeal sacropexy. doi
  37. IVS Tunneller Anti-incontinence: NR Hysterectomy: 3/7 Efficacy: 6w Safety: 5m (2-11) Safety 42 ID N Age, y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft Anti-incontinence procedures Follow up Outcomes Petros
  38. (2007). Laparoscopic versus robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse. doi
  39. laparoscopic) D, abdominal (open) A, sacrocolpopexy B, sacrocolpopexy C, sacrocolpopexy D, sacrocolpopexy A, polypropylene, doi
  40. (2006). LAS study - a randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. doi
  41. (2005). Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. doi
  42. (2006). Long-term outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy using xenograft compared with synthetic mesh. doi
  43. (2002). Longterm success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. doi
  44. (2004). Mechanical devices for pelvic organ prolapse in women. doi
  45. (2006). Mesh erosion and abdominal sacrocolpopexy: A comparison of prior, total, and supracervical hysterectomy. doi
  46. (2006). Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. doi
  47. (2007). Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:499-504. 25 46. Higgs doi
  48. (2009). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence doi
  49. (2009). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Infracoccygeal sacropexy using mesh for uterine prolapse repair.
  50. (2009). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Insertion of mesh uterine suspension sling (including sacrohysteropexy) for uterine prolapse repair.
  51. (2009). National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009). Sacrocolpopexy using mesh for vaginal vault.
  52. NR 13m Efficacy Oliver 2006[52] 14 73 (18) 7/7 NR Vaginal Modified infracoccygeal sacropexy with uterine preservation
  53. NR 43m (1m-17y) Efficacy Safety Timmons 1992[59] 163 58 (19-81) 163/3 NR Abdominal (open) Sacrocolpopexy Fascial lata (NR trade name); polyethylene tetraphalate,
  54. (2006). Observational data collection of surgical outcomes in the treatment of vaginal prolapse with AMS products. ClincialTrials.gov Identifier NCT00388947.
  55. (2007). Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:257-261. 22 21. Govier doi
  56. (2003). Pigne A doi
  57. (2002). Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse--a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. doi
  58. (2006). Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. doi
  59. (2006). Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vaginal prolapse. doi
  60. (2007). Prospective randomised study to compare colposacropexy and Mayo McCall technique in the correction of severe genital central prolapse.
  61. (2005). Randomized controlled trial comparing acellular collagen biomesh (Pelvisoft) to polypropylene mesh (Pelvitex) for sacral colpopexy.
  62. (2007). Randomized multicentric study to treat prolapse after hysterectomy with Amreich procedure or total Prolift procedure.
  63. (2002). Sacrocolpopexy--a report on 262 consecutive operations.
  64. (2001). Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse. doi
  65. (1996). Sacrospinous vault suspension and abdominal colposacropexy: success rates and complications. doi
  66. (1995). Shortterm results and long-term patients' appraisal of abdominal colposacropexy for treatment of genital and vaginal vault prolapse. doi
  67. (2007). Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3. doi
  68. (2005). Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata. doi
  69. (1997). Synthetic sling for genital prolapse in young women. doi
  70. (2009). Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews in health care (2009). Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, doi
  71. Table 2 Median and ranges of mesh erosion rates for sacrocolpopexy a,b No. study n/N (%) Median (range) Non-absorbable synthetic mesh
  72. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. doi
  73. (2005). Tissue Fixation System posterior sling for repair of uterine/vault prolapse -- a preliminary report. doi
  74. (1993). Total abdominal hysterectomy at abdominal sacrovaginopexy - a comparative-study. doi
  75. (2005). Treatment of stress and mixed urinary incontinence and vaginal vault prolapse.
  76. (2005). Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. doi
  77. (2001). Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. doi
  78. (2007). Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. doi
  79. (1996). Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. doi
  80. (2001). Vault prolapse II: Restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. doi
  81. (2001). y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft Concomitant procedure Follow up (mean) Outcomes Non-randomised comparative studies Visco
  82. y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft Concomitant procedure Follow up (mean) Outcomes RCT Roovers 2004[12]
  83. y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up,
  84. y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up, mean Outcomes Case series Fedorkow
  85. y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up, mean Outcomes Gregory 2005[22]
  86. y Uterine/ vault Primary/ secondary Intervention route Technique Mesh/graft, trade name Concomitant procedure Follow up, mean Outcomes UTERINE RCT (abs.)

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.