Perirenal fat stranding is not a powerful diagnostic tool for acute pyelonephritis [Corrigendum]

Abstract

Fukami H, Takeuchi Y, Kagaya S, et al. Int J Gen Med. 2017;10:137–144.Page 137, Abstract, Results, the text “The frequency of PFS was 72% in the pyelonephritis group vs 39% in the control group” should read “The frequency of PFS was 72% in the pyelonephritis group vs 29% in the control group”.Page 140, Table 1, Control (PRB) column, last row, the data “93 (39%)” should read “93 (29%)”.Page 141, Discussion, line 5, the text “PFS was found in 39% of patients” should read “PFS was found in 72% of patients”. Read the original articl

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Directory of Open Access Journals

redirect
Last time updated on 08/04/2018

This paper was published in Directory of Open Access Journals.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.