Resource use and costs in high-risk symptomatic peripheral artery disease patients with diabetes and prior acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective analysis

Abstract

<p><b>Objectives</b>: As the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) increases there is growing concern about the associated healthcare burden. This burden has not been well-characterized in high-risk patients with concurrent diabetes and/or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The objective of this analysis was to assess comorbidities, medication use, outcomes, services and costs for 3 high-risk symptomatic PAD groups.</p> <p><b>Methods</b>: This retrospective longitudinal analysis used the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (2005-2013). The 3 high-risk symptomatic PAD groups were (1) symptomatic PAD with/without diabetes, (2) symptomatic PAD with/without prior ACS, and (3) symptomatic PAD with/without diabetes and prior ACS. The study time frame was a period of 1-year before the earliest date of a symptomatic PAD record and 3 years post.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: In all, 16,663 symptomatic PAD patients were identified across the three risk groups. Mean age ranged from 66.4-67.4 years; the majority (55.0%-63.3%) were men. At 3 years post index, patients with symptomatic PAD and a risk factor had significantly higher use of beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins (<i>P</i><0.0007), and higher rates of all-cause and symptomatic PAD-related medical services, diagnoses and procedures (<i>P</i><0.05). Clopidogrel and statins were used by ≤41.2% and ≤66.7% of symptomatic PAD patients without risk, respectively, and ≤68.9% and ≤80.2% of patients with risks. All cause and symptomatic PAD-related treatment costs (<i>P</i><0.0001) were higher for symptomatic PAD patients with risks versus patients without risks where annualized all-cause cost differences ranged from 7,482to7,482 to 13,504 and annualized PAD-related cost differences ranged from 605to605 to 1,997.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: Symptomatic PAD patients with diabetes and/or prior ACS have significantly higher medical resource use and costs compared to symptomatic PAD patients without these risk factors. The utilization rate of secondary prevention therapies is suboptimal; therefore, greater effort must be made to increase utilization and optimize treatment to minimize the impact of symptomatic PAD.</p

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

FigShare

redirect
Last time updated on 12/02/2018

This paper was published in FigShare.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.