Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

An evaluation of the provision of terminal facilities for the design of low cost airport terminals

By Rohafiz Sabar

Abstract

The growth of the Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) in the world will have a significant impact on future airport development. LCCs such as Ryanair, Air Asia and EasyJet prefer only basic terminal facilities (TFs) at Low Cost Terminals (LCTs) to reduce associated costs (airport charges, capital investment, operational costs). Pressure by LCCs for reduced airport charges has led to the inclusion of only basic TFs so as to reduce capital investment and operational costs. This has raised an interest in the evaluation of TFs within LCT design. A reduction of airport charges, which is possible through LCTs, is indirectly linked to the reduction in air fares. The debate concerning the development of the ‘right’ TFs has led to considerable discussion by airport operators. Airports have to retain the airlines as business partners and customers. To this end, they need to develop facilities that offer best value in order to retain their custom. In addition, airports must be flexible enough to meet the changing needs of passengers. With particular emphasis on experiences at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA), this research is an evaluation the provision of TFs for a LCT model, taking into account potentially conflicting expectations of airline and airport managements, and passengers. A research framework was developed as the result of a literature review of LCT design and development. The research itself used multiple questionnaires in pre- and postdevelopment surveys involving three different parties: airline management (Air Asia Berhad), airport operator (Malaysia Airports Holding Berhad) and passengers (LCT users). The headquarters of Air Asia Berhad and Malaysia Airports Berhad were visited and surveys were undertaken to ascertain the viewpoints of LCC passengers flying with Air Asia, a low-cost airline based at KLIA, Malaysia. The main focus of this research has been to propose a possible conceptual model for LCT design with an emphasis on simplifying the provision of TFs in such a way as to reduce capital investment and operational and airport charges, while at the same time being able to generate additional airport revenues. The evidence from the surveys reveals that, in LCT design, there are conflicting expectations between airlines, airport authorities and passengers on the adequacy of TFs whose design is influenced by consideration of cost and revenue structures. The proposed conceptual model indicates the preferences for core and secondary TFs within LCT design after the cost and revenue structures, and airline management, airport operator and passenger’s expectations, are considered

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/4412
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A Guide to Successful Dissertation Study for Students of Built Environment.
  2. (1961). A Queuing Model with StateDependent Service Rate.
  3. (1998). Airline Alliances and Partner Firm's Outputs. doi
  4. (1993). Airline Deregulation and Nodal Accessibility. doi
  5. (2005). Airport & Air Navigation Charges Manual.
  6. (2000). Airport Design and Operation.
  7. (2004). Airport Development Reference Manual. 9 edit.
  8. (1992). Airport Engineering. doi
  9. (1997). Airport Handling Manual. 17 edit.
  10. (2004). Airport Planning and Management.
  11. (1998). Airport Terminals. 2 edit. doi
  12. (2003). Airport-airline Interaction: The Impact of Low-cost Carriers on Two European Airports. doi
  13. (2004). Airports' Perspectives on the Growth of Low Cost Airlines and the Remodelling of the Airport-airline Relationship. doi
  14. (1998). An Airport Passenger Terminal Simulator: A Planning and Design Tool. doi
  15. (2005). An Assessment of the Provision of Passenger Terminal Facilities for Low Cost Airlines. UK, Cranfield University. MSc Thesis.
  16. (2004). An Evaluation of Under Utilisation Airports Operating as Dual Purpose Airports for Low Cost and Freighter Operator Within Europe. UK, Cranfield University. MSc Thesis.
  17. (2005). An Exploratory Study into Airport Choice Factors for European Low-cost Airlines. doi
  18. (2007). Analysis of the Effect of Air Transport Liberalisation on the Domestic Market in Japan, UK,
  19. (2004). Annual Report
  20. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.
  21. (2008). Asia Pacific Aviation (CAPA).
  22. (2007). Assessing Chronic Joint Pain: Lessons from a Focus Group Study, doi
  23. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods. 5 edit.
  24. (2003). Competitive Advantages for Low Cost Airlines: Some Implications for Airports. doi
  25. (1995). Competitive Fare and Frequency Effects in Airport Market Share Modelling. doi
  26. (2004). Cost–benefit Analysis of Investments in Airport Infrastructure: A Practical Approach. doi
  27. (2005). Coventry Airport New Passenger Terminal Supplemental Environmental Statement-Non-Technical Summary.
  28. (2007). EC Airport Charges Proposal: A First Step in Re-Balancing the Airport/Airline Relationship. IATA’s Director General and CEO. Anthony Council Director, Corporate Communications.
  29. (1992). Educational Research.
  30. (2003). Factor Influencing the Development of Former Military Airfield into Commercial Use. UK, Cranfield University. MSc Thesis.
  31. (1988). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. doi
  32. (2001). Global Airline Alliances: International Regulatory Issues. doi
  33. (2006). Having the Major Forces Driving Leisure Airline Traffic Change? doi
  34. (2004). How do the Demands for Airport Services Differ between Fullservice Carriers and Low-cost Carriers? doi
  35. (2000). How to get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and their Supervisor. 3 edit. Buckingham,
  36. (2003). How to Sample in Surveys, The Survey Kit. 2 edit.
  37. (2007). Hub Airport Slots, Market Exit and Irish Regional Economic Development. Quarterly Economic Commentary, The Economic and Social Research Institute.
  38. (2006). Increasing Risk in the 'Scary' World of Work? Male and Female Resistance to Crossing Gender Lines in Apprenticeships in England and Wales. doi
  39. (2007). Innovation: The Winning Formula to Regain Profitability in Aviation? doi
  40. Kuala Lumpur International Airport Charges Handbook. Malaysia: Malaysia Airport Holding Berhad. doi
  41. (2006). LCT User Charges. Malaysia: Malaysia Airport Holding Berhad.
  42. (2006). London Luton Airport Operations Limited: Annual Report and Accounts for the Year Ended 31
  43. (2006). Low Cost Airlines, Secondary Airports and State Aid: An Economic Assessment of the Ryanair/Charleroi Agreement, doi
  44. (1975). Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Review. doi
  45. (2003). Managing Airports: An International Perspective. doi
  46. (2004). Market Analysis of Europe's Low Cost Airlines: An Examination of Trends
  47. (1980). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning and Control. doi
  48. (1992). Measuring Performance of Airport Passenger Terminals. doi
  49. (1990). Methodology for Planning and Operation Management of Airport Terminal Facilities. UK,
  50. (1988). Need Analysis. doi
  51. (1992). Passenger Terminal Design. doi
  52. (2005). Passengers' Perception of Low Cost Airlines and Full Service Carriers: A Case Study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines. doi
  53. (1971). Pedestrian Planning and Design. Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners Inc.
  54. (1993). Planning and Design of Airports.
  55. (2004). Principle and Practice of Marketing.
  56. (2004). Prospective Futures of Low Cost Airlines in Mainland China. UK, Cranfield University. MSc Thesis.
  57. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2 edit. doi
  58. (1997). Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms.
  59. (1988). Qualitative Market Research. doi
  60. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. doi
  61. (1990). Quantitative Data Analysis for Social Scientist. 3 edit.
  62. (2002). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner: Researchers. 2 edit. doi
  63. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2 edit.
  64. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative Approaches. doi
  65. (2002). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. 4 edit.
  66. (2002). Research Methods for Managers. 3 edit.
  67. (2006). Singapore’s Transport Minister Unveils Low Cost Terminal Design. Asia Pacific Aviation News.
  68. (2002). Sizing Of Processing and Holding Air Terminal Facilities for Charter Passengers Using Simulation Tools. doi
  69. (1999). Skills for Best Value: Performance Indicators, Targets and Operational Standards.
  70. (1994). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. doi
  71. (2002). SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis.
  72. (2006). SPSS Version 13.0 for Windows; Analysis without Anguish.
  73. (1999). The Choice of Air Carrier, Flight and Fare Class. doi
  74. (2005). The Effect of Brand, Agent, and Price on Consumer Evaluation of Travel Service. doi
  75. (2000). The Effect of Low Fare Air Carriers on Airfares in the US. doi
  76. (2006). The Impacts of Emerging Aviation Trends on Airport Infrastructure. doi
  77. (1997). The Implications of the Ireland–UK Airline Deregulation for an EU Internal Market, doi
  78. (1996). The Management of a Student Research Project. 2 edit.
  79. (2001). The Postgraduate Research Handbook.
  80. (2001). The Southwest Effect in Multi-airport Regions. doi
  81. (2007). The Strategic Response of Full Service Airlines to the Low Cost Carrier Threat and the Perception of Passengers to Each Type of Carrier. UK,
  82. (2007). The Transferability of the Low-cost Model to Long-haul Airline Operations. doi
  83. (1991). Understanding Research Methods.
  84. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System, doi
  85. (2005). Using Value Management to Improve the Consideration of Sustainability within Construction.
  86. (1986). Utilization-Focused Evaluation. doi
  87. (2007). Waiting Time in Emergency Evacuation of Crowded Public Transport Terminals. doi
  88. (2005). When Being the Lowest is Not Enough: Building a Successful Low Fares Airline Business Model in Asia. doi
  89. (2005). When Does Airline Competition Become Predation? Competition versus Predation in Aviation Market.
  90. (2006). Where Next for Low-cost Airlines? A Spatial and Temporal Comparative Study. doi
  91. (2005). Why Do LCC Arise and How Can They Survive the Competitive Responses of Established Airlines, A Theoretical Explanation.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.