Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Effect of different surface preparations prior to painting \ud on the corrosion behaviour and surface activity of mild steel

By Douglas J Mills and S Jamali


Previous work in our laboratory showed that the type of surface preparation of the steel prior \ud to coating had a dramatic effect on the subsequent corrosion protection afforded in immersion \ud tests and in salt spray testing. Particularly water jetting led to better performance. It is \ud generally accepted that factors such as removal of impurities and introducing surface \ud roughness to steel to obtain better adhesion through the mechanical interlocking of polymeric \ud structure and the metal surface play a part. However it is postulated that the ease of \ud breakdown of the oxide film is also critically important and varies between surface \ud preparations. This was investigated in the present study where 5 different surface preparation \ud methods (abrasive blasting, water-jetting, abrasion, acid pickling and degreasing) were \ud applied to the mild steel surface and each resultant surface was characterised using \ud electrochemical methods. The Scanning vibrating electrode technique (SVET) was performed \ud in dilute saline water to detect anodic and cathodic sites on the surface and also to determine \ud the intensity of electrochemical activity at these sites. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) \ud together with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was used to characterise the \ud surface structure and its chemical composition. Changes in open circuit potential have been \ud monitored during the time of exposure to electrolyte in order to investigate the general surface \ud activity. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was employed to analyse the \ud charge transfer situation on the metal surface. Results using these techniques will be presented \ud and discussed. An anticipated outcome from this work is development of a simple \ud electrochemical method to assess that a metal surface is in a condition suitable for coating. \ud This could also be used as a way of checking that standard pretreatments had been effective \ud and assist in the development of new ones\u

Topics: TP250, TA418
Publisher: Dechema
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:
Provided by: NECTAR

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). EIS examination of mill scale on mild steel with polyester–epoxy powder coating, Progress in Organic Coatings, doi
  2. (2009). Electrochemical behavior of mild steel in chloride environment: influence of surface preparation with and without corrosion inhibitor, doi
  3. (1998). Evaluation of the surface treatment effect on the corrosion performance of paint coated carbon steel, Progress in Organic Coatings, doi
  4. (2009). Influence of pitting and iron oxide formation during corrosion of carbon steel in unbuffered NaCl solutions, Corrosion Science, doi
  5. (2008). Localized dissolution electrochemistry at surface irregularities of pipeline steel, doi
  6. (2008). Surface preparation: A primer,
  7. (1985). the role of adhesion in corrosion protection by organic coatings, doi
  8. (1999). The role of chloride ions in pitting of carbon steel studied by the statistical analysis of electrochemical noise, Applied Surface Science, doi
  9. (1996). The surface condition effect on adhesion and corrosion resistance of carbon steel/chlorinated rubber/artificial sea water system, Corrosion Science, doi
  10. (2010). Use of electrochemical methods to examine different surface preparation methods for organic coatings on steel, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.