Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Loss of Manual Flying Skills in Pilots of Highly Automated Airliners

By Matthew Ebbatson

Abstract

Anecdotal and subjective evidence suggests that the manual flying ability of pilots operating highly automated aircraft is declining owing to a lack of opportunity to exercise such skills in the modern air transport environment. However, there is a paucity of objective evidence to support this safety concern. Consequently, the work presented in this thesis aims to provide empirically derived data to evaluate the extent and causes of the speculated manual skills decline and guide possible intervention strategies. Initially a cognitive task analysis is undertaken to determine the cognitive demands of performing manual flight in a large jet transport aircraft. Expert pilots report employing highly refined mental models structures which enable them to predict the aircrafts performance whilst causing minimal burden to their mental capacity. The study concludes that when measuring manual flying performance careful consideration must be given to designing a task which challenges both the cognitive and physical aspects of manual flying skill. Secondly, relatively novel pilot performance measures based upon the frequency analysis of control input data are evaluated. An empirical study finds that these techniques are both reliable and sensitive to manual flying performance. Furthermore, when studying large transport aircraft, such measures of the pilots control strategy are found to contribute valuable information about performance which is missing when just traditional ‘outer-loop’ performance measures are applied. The study concludes that these measures of control strategy are valuable in evaluating manual flying performance. Finally, the manual flying skills of a sample of pilots of highly automated aircraft are evaluated on a challenging manual flying task. A significant proportion exhibit poor manual flying performance as judged by a type rating examiner. Further analysis reveals that the performance of the pilots is significantly influenced by the amount of recent manual handling experience they have accumulated, rather than their longer-term manual flying experience. Significantly, airspeed tracking ability is influenced which is cited elsewhere as a causal factor in many manual flying skill related accidents. The results support the previous anecdotal and subjective concerns relating to the loss of manual flying skills

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3484
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). A Framework for Understanding Crew Performance Assessment Issues. doi
  2. (1992). A Guide to Task Analysis. Taylor and Francis, doi
  3. (2003). A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Ashgate, doi
  4. (1990). A Lattice Approach to the Structure of Mental Models. doi
  5. (1967). A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models. doi
  6. (2003). A Search For Meaning: A Case Study of the Approach-To-Landing. doi
  7. (2002). Advanced flight data analysis>
  8. (2006). Air Accident Investigation Branch
  9. (1993). Anxiety and Eye-Hands-Legs Coordination in Young Pilots. doi
  10. (1997). Applied Cognitive Task Analysis (ACTA) Methodology. NPRDCTN-98-4, Navy Personnel Research and Development Centre, doi
  11. (2008). Australian Transport Safety Bureau,
  12. (1998). Automation in Aviation: A Human Factors Perspective.
  13. (1997). Automation Surprises.
  14. (1997). Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, doi
  15. (1998). Aviation Human Factors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, doi
  16. (2000). Aviation Psychology, doi
  17. (2008). Civil Aviation Authority doi
  18. Civil Aviation Authority (2005). Standards Document 24. Version 05: Guidance to Examiners: Multi-pilot Aeroplanes (MPA) Type Rating skill tests and proficiency checks. Civil Aviation Authority Safety Regulation Group,
  19. (1988). Cockpit Automation. In doi
  20. (1994). Cognitive Failure Analysis for Aircraft Accident Investigation. doi
  21. (2001). Cognitive Task Analysis of Business Jet Pilots' Weather Flying Behaviours: Preliminary Results. doi
  22. (1998). Communication in the Presence of Noise. doi
  23. (2001). Derivation of Pilot Performance Measures from Flight Data Recorder Information.
  24. (1995). Differences in Aircrew Manual Skill in Automated and Conventional Flight Decks.
  25. (1992). Extracting, Representing, and Analyzing Mental Models. doi
  26. (1998). Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis. Human Performance. doi
  27. (2003). Flight Crew and Aircraft Performance During RNAV Approaches: Studying the Effects of Throwing New Technology at an Old Problem. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety.
  28. (2004). Flight Crew Reliance on Automation.
  29. (2007). Flight Deck Automation Issues: Incident Report Analysis. http://www.flightdeckautomation.com/incidentstudy/incidentanalysis.aspx .
  30. (2004). Flight Operations Department Communication (FODCOM) 24/2004. Civil Aviation Authority Safety Regulation Group,
  31. Foundation (2000); Approach and Landing Accident Reduction Tool Kit. Flight Safety Foundation, doi
  32. (1995). How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speed. doi
  33. (2001). Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents: Application of the Human Factors Analysis Classification System. doi
  34. (1990). Human Error. doi
  35. (2007). Human Factors Analysis of Australian Aviation Accidents and Comparison with the United States. B2004/0321. Australian Transport Safety Bureau,
  36. (1988). Human factors in Aviation. doi
  37. (1998). Human Factors in Flight. Ashgate,
  38. (1989). Human Factors of Advanced Technology ("Glass Cockpit") Transport Aircraft. NASA CR 177528, NASA
  39. (2006). Impact Of Glass Cockpit Experience On Manual Flight Skills.
  40. (1987). Inadequacy of Root Mean Square Error as a Performance Measure.
  41. (1959). Industrial Accident Prevention: A Scientific Approach. 4 th Ed.
  42. (2000). Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft. 91 st Edition.
  43. (2004). Mechanical Reasoning by Mental Simulation. Trends in doi
  44. (1999). Mental Models in Theory doi
  45. (1995). Mental Rehearsal Techniques for Reducing Skill Decay of Unemployed Commercial Pilots. Aviation Psychology: Training and selection;
  46. (2003). Modern Flight Deck Automation: Pilots Mental Model and Monitoring Patterns and Performance.
  47. (2004). More on the Fragility of Performance: Choking Under Pressure in Mathematical Problem Solving. doi
  48. (2005). Objective Pilot Performance Measurement: A Literature Review and Taxonomy of Metrics.
  49. (1993). Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced "Complacency". doi
  50. (1995). Performance, Workload, and Fatigue Changes Associated with Automation. doi
  51. (2005). Pilot Activities and the Level of Cockpit Automation. doi
  52. (1988). Pilot Control. doi
  53. (1998). Pilot Opinion on Cockpit Automation Issues. doi
  54. (1998). Pilots' Spatial Mental Models for Memory of Heading and Altitude. doi
  55. (2006). Practice Makes Imperfect: Common Factors in Recent Manual Approach Incidents. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety.
  56. (2006). Situational Awareness. doi
  57. (2008). Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accidents, Worldwide Operations 1959-2007. Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
  58. (2006). The Applicatiion of Frequency Analysis Based Performance Measures as an Adjunct to Flight Path Derived Measures of Pilot Performance. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety.
  59. (1978). The Development and Evaluation of Objective Frequency Domain Based Pilot Performance Measures
  60. (1999). The Effect of Level on Automation on Time Spent Looking Out of the Cockpit. doi
  61. (1992). The Effect of Low Blood Alcohol Levels on Pilot Performance in a Series of Simulated Approach and Landing Trials. doi
  62. (2004). The Effectiveness of a Personal Computer Aviation Training Device, a Flight Training Device, and An Airplane in Conducting Instrument Proficiency Checks. Volume 2: Objective Pilot Performance Measures. Final technical report
  63. (1995). The Effectiveness of ab-initio Flight Training Using Either Linked or Unlinked Primary Axis Flight Controls. doi
  64. (2003). The Impact of Automation Use on the Mental Model: Findings from the Air Traffic Control Domain. doi
  65. (1985). The Introduction of New Cockpit Technology: A Human Factors Study. NASA-TM-86659; REPT-86659; NAS 1.15:86659; Pagination 71P.
  66. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. doi
  67. (1999). The Role of Mental Simulation in Problem Solving and Decision Making.
  68. (2004). Time Series Based Objective Pilot Performance Measures. doi
  69. (1999). Transition to Glass: Pilot Training for High-Technology Transport Aircraft. NASA/CR-1999-208784, National Aeronautics and Space Administration,
  70. (2003). Understanding Normal and Atypical Operations Through Analysis of Flight Data.
  71. (2001). What Pilots Learn About Auto-Flight While Flying on the Line.
  72. (1986). Working Memory. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.