Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Servicing polar platforms using electric propulsion

By C. S. Welch

Abstract

The future of space development has been examined in the context of the infrastructure necessary support it. It is concluded that the selection of propulsion systems for in-orbit transportation requires the development of general computer codes capable of simulating the use of a wide range of propulsion systems on near-Earth missions. It is also concluded that, even if limited infrastructural development occurs, polar orbiting spacecraft will be an important feature of future space activities. Replacing current single-use polar spacecraft with extended-life serviceable platforms is attractive. However, the very limited manned access polar orbits in the mid-term future suggests that such platforms will only be possible if remote telerobotic/autonomous servicing can be carried out. To this extent polar platforms are considered to provide a useful driver and first testbed for the development of technologies designed to extend human capability in those regimes where direct mediation is not possible. Options for such remote servicing are examined, the concept of performing nodal transfers by enhanced differential nodal drift is introduced and the application of electric propulsion to this discussed. Low-thrust orbital manoeuvres are analyzed in this context and the conditions for optimum nodal transfer defined. Particular service vehicle configurations are then defined against a projected infrastructure and baseline polar platform constellation. A model for the service vehicle is defined and its performance investigated using a number of electric propulsion systems. Simulations of transfer manoeuvres; have been carried out and the effects and relative importance of the various orbit perturbations identified. It is concluded that a service vehicle propelled by a Xenon ion system offers the capability required and two final configurations are identified characterising different servicing mission upload schemes

Publisher: Cranfield University
Year: 1992
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/3435
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1983). A program to develop efficient manned operations in space, Space Manufacturing
  2. (1986). A review of future orbit transfer technology,
  3. Affordability through technology,
  4. An analysis of orbit maneuvering capabilities using arcjet propulsion, doi
  5. (1984). and A comparison of electric propulsion technologies for orbit doi
  6. and A control methodology for low-thrust orbital transfer,
  7. (1985). and Analysis of electric propulsion concepts for near-term mission KNOWLES,
  8. and Earth orbital satellite lifetime,
  9. (1989). and Electric propulsion for orbit transfer: a case study, doi
  10. and Large inert-gas thrusters, doi
  11. and Parametric studies of electric propulsion systems for orbit FUJITA, T. transfer vehicles, doi
  12. (1982). and planetary environment criteria guidelines for use in space vehicle development, doi
  13. and Polar platform configuration and servicing, Space WINDSOR,
  14. (1987). and The service role of a space station: satellite/platform service doi
  15. (1984). Applied field xnagnetoplasmadynamic thrusters for orbit
  16. (1990). Ariane 5 aims for the future, Aerospace America,
  17. (1987). Challenge '95 - The Ariane 5 development programme,
  18. Comparison of potential electric propulsion systems for orbit transfer, doi
  19. (1983). Computational modelling of the perturbations acting on a close earth satellite,
  20. Cost-effective orbit transfer modes for satellite retrieval and servicing,
  21. Direct Energy Conversion, Allyn and Bacon,
  22. (1984). Electrostatic thruster capabilities for orbit raising and manoeuvering missions, doi
  23. Elite systems analysis, doi
  24. EOS mission design utilizing the space station platforms, doi
  25. (1991). EOS panel favors shrinking satellites,
  26. EOS will tell the Earth's story, Aerospace America,
  27. (1985). European aspects of using the space station,
  28. European manned in orbit infrastructure - an alternative view,
  29. (1987). Fuel and time considerations for satellite servicing, AlAA paper doi
  30. Infomiing on the
  31. (1989). Investigation and docking and berthing dynamics,
  32. (1979). Ion propulsion cost effectivity, Electric propulsion and its doi
  33. (1983). Measured performance of a multimegawatt MPD thruster, doi
  34. Near-earth electric propulsion transfers with doi
  35. (1991). New rocket emphasized in space policy shift,
  36. (1976). NOAA The US Standard Atmosphere, doi
  37. (1989). of the second European in-orbit operations technology symposium,
  38. (1972). On the equinoctial orbit elements, doi
  39. (1988). On-orbit servicing and cost effectiveness of Columbus polar platform concepts, doi
  40. (1989). Orbital replacement units design considerations,
  41. Orbital Workbench - Version 1.0, Program Description and User's Manual, Cygnus ENgineering, 918 Leighton Way,
  42. (1991). Pad reactivation to serve secret satellite needs,
  43. (1986). Photovoltaics for high capacity space power systems, doi
  44. (1987). Satellite orbits in an atmosphere: theory and applications, doi
  45. (1980). Solar Cell Array Design Handbook, doi
  46. (1991). Space transportation systems for the 21 st Century, Aerospace America,
  47. Status of xenon ion propulsion technology, doi
  48. (1987). Technology requirements for telerobotic satellite servicing in space,
  49. (1991). The Ariane Transfer Vehicle doi
  50. (1987). The European Data Relay System as part of the in-orbit DINWIDDY,
  51. (1988). The European long-term space plan, doi
  52. (1988). The Geostationary Application Satellite, doi
  53. The gravity potential of the force field of the Earth through the fourth order,
  54. The space economy of doi
  55. (1964). Theory of satellite orbits in an atmosphere, doi
  56. (1985). Vol 58, Advances in the Astronautical Sciences. KLENAU, W., European orbit transfer and servicing
  57. (1991). Wings for European spaceflight - the future of space ISAKEIT,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.