Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Application of the ecosystem functions framework to community woodlands

By Olivia Agbenyega

Abstract

The UK government provides financial incentives to land owners who promote community use of newly-planted woodlands. De Groot et al. (2002) have developed a framework for classifying ecosystem functions. This research applies this framework to identify and describe perceptions of the function, use and value of community woodlands in order to inform local management and government policy. The research was an exploratory and descriptive case study with an initial flexible and final fixed stage. A poplar wood (Pegnut Wood) and two mixed-broadleaf woodlands(Clapham Park Wood and Reynolds Wood), all planted in Bedfordshire between 1993 and 1998, provided the case studies. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews, self-administered structured questionnaires, direct observation, modelling of tree data and review of secondary documents. In total 172 out of 400 local residents, 20 on-site visitors, and 8 other stakeholders (owners, government institutions and conservation groups) gave responses. The primary motivations of the owners for establishing the woods were production, information and habitat functions. However financial cost-benefit analyses indicated negative returns to owners without government grants. In the first set of interviews 43- 58% of the local respondents at each site described the selected woods and community woods as “very important”. There was a significant positive association between nearness to the woods and level of importance. Those who visited the woods placed greatest emphasis on the use of the woods for exercise and recreation (48-64%), and as a wildlife habitat (50-52%). Using the ecosystem function framework, local respondents at Pegnut Wood and Clapham Park Wood placed greatest value on habitat (29-39%) and information functions (33-38%) and lowest value on regulation (14-19%), production (5-8%) and negative functions (7-8%). Respondents at Reynolds Wood placed the greatest relative importance on negative functions (36%). Across the three sites, local respondents placed the greatest relative value on the use of the woodlands as a habitat for wild plants and animals (14%) and to provide landscape beauty (12%). A second set of interviews, focussed on the recreational use of the woodlands, showed that the main purpose for visiting the woods was walking (median frequency of once a month and duration of between 31-60 minutes). Fifteen out of 88 respondents indicated that they were willing to contribute to support the woods. Many of those not in favour felt such support was a government responsibility. Overall, owners, local residents, government and local conservation groups showed similar relative valuations of the different functions and uses of community woodlands, indicating that there was substantial scope for working together. The research showed that it was useful to apply the ecosystem functions framework to community woodlands. It provided a structure for analysing planting objectives and it encouraged a focus on indirect uses. Stakeholders recognised potential negative functions of the woodland, and it proved useful to include these in the framework. We note the challenges in recognising and placing a high value on the regulation function amongst the range of stakeholders. The framework also helped to identify synergies and tensions between stakeholders without the need for monetising values

Publisher: School of Applied Sciences
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk:1826/1723
Provided by: Cranfield CERES

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). (2001-2006) UK BAP Website. Available at: http://www.ukbap.org.uk/default.aspx.
  2. (1998). A Guide to the Woodland Grant Scheme. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.Cranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  3. (2006). A Model for Quantifying and Predicting Urban Pressure on Woodland. Landscape and Urban Planning, doi
  4. (2004). A Sort of Magical Place: People’s Experiences of Woodlands in Northwest and Southwest England.
  5. (2002). A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services. doi
  6. (2000). Amenity Valuation of Trees and Woodlands. doi
  7. (2004). An Ecological Perspective on the Valuation of Ecosystem Services. doi
  8. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, doi
  9. (1996). An Introduction to Survey Research, Polling and Data Analysis. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif:
  10. (1992). An Inventory of Ancient Woodland for England and Wales. doi
  11. (2003). Applications of Case Study Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks:
  12. (2003). Applied Statistics using SPSS, STATISTICA and MATLAB. doi
  13. (1982). Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco CA: doi
  14. (2005). Available at: www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/.
  15. (2000). Bedfordshire Farm Woodland Demonstration Project.
  16. (2005). Biodiversity Conservation and the Extinction of Experience. doi
  17. (1993). Biophilia, Biophobia and Natural landscapes.
  18. (1991). British Plant Communities: Volume 1 Woodlands and Scrub. Cambridge: doi
  19. (1994). Case Study Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks:
  20. (2006). Communication between Science, Policy and Citizens in Public Participation in Urban Forestry -Experiences from the Neighbourwoods Project. Urban Forestry doi
  21. (2003). Communities in Nature: The Construction and Understanding of Forest Natures. doi
  22. (1991). Community Woodland Design Guidelines. UK: Forestry Commission.
  23. (2004). Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics. doi
  24. (2005). Consultants with SQW Ltd
  25. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. Fourth ed. Thousand Oaks,
  26. (2000). Designing Social Research. doi
  27. (1999). Developing a Methodology for Assessing the Financial Viability of Farm Woodlands.
  28. (2007). Development of an Ecosystem Approach. Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/natres/develop.htm.
  29. (2002). Discourse-based Valuation of Ecosystem Services: Establishing Fair Outcomes through Group Deliberation. doi
  30. (2004). District Council (2004) North Devon District Council's Supplementary Planning Guidance on Community Woodlands. Available at: http:www.northdevon.gov.uk/services/local plan/commwood.pdf.
  31. (2003). Economic Analysis of Forestry Policy in England. Final report for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
  32. (2002). Economic and Ecological Concepts for Valuing Ecosystem Services. doi
  33. (2003). Economic Valuation: What and Why. doi
  34. (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
  35. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. doi
  36. (2006). End of the Road for a Notorious Picnic Site, unpublished Newspaper article. Anon. Clapham Park Wood (Undated) Clapham Park Wood, unpublished Pamphlet. Anon. Pegnut Wood (Undated) Enjoy The Potton-Sutton Circular Walk, unpublished Pamphlet.
  37. (1998). England Forestry Strategy: A New Focus for England's Woodlands; Strategic Priorities and Programmes. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/fcefs.pdf/$FILE/fcefs.pdf.
  38. (2006). England Trees, Woods and Forests: A Consultation Document.
  39. (1987). Environmental Functions as a Unifying Concept for Ecology and Economics. doi
  40. (2004). Exploring the Usefulness of a Conceptual Framework as a Research Tool: A Researcher's Reflections.
  41. (1988). Farm Woodland Planning: Forestry Commission Bulletin 80. England: Forestry Commission.
  42. (1999). Farm Woodlands for the Future. Papers presented at the conference 'Farm for the future'
  43. (1999). Farm Woodlands- The Role of the Forestry Commission. In:
  44. (2004). Fly-Tipping Strategy: A Consultation Document.
  45. (1975). Forest Mensuration Handbook. London: Forestry Commission.
  46. (1999). Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper 001: Common Terms and Definitions. Available at: http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/ae217e00.htm.
  47. Forestry Commission (2004a) The UK forestry Standard: The Government’s Approach to Sustainable Forestry. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission. doi
  48. (2006). Forestry Commission (2006) Woodland. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/AHEN-5G5GN7.
  49. (2005). Forestry Commission (2006a) Forestry Statistics doi
  50. (2006). Forestry Commission (2006b) English Woodland Grant Scheme. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/ewgs.
  51. (2006). Forestry Commission (2006d) Research. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/research.
  52. Forestry Commission (2006e) East of England Woodland Creation Grant Scoring Guide 2006/7. Forestry Commission.
  53. (2006). Forestry Commission (2006f) What Do We Mean by Involvement. Available at:
  54. (2006). Forestry Commission (2006g) Communities. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/forestry/hcou-4ucf3z.
  55. (2006). Forestry Commission (2006h) Mull Community Group Successful in Bid to Buy National Forest Land. Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/newsrele.nsf/ec2722f3162dcf1f80256a1c004cb80d/ becaa30c27a9a87480257168003a00c2!OpenDocument. Accessed 31 stDecember
  56. (2007). Forestry Commission (2006i) Social Research. Available at:
  57. (1999). Forestry Commission MAFF, Institute of Ecology and Resource Management,
  58. (1991). Forestry Practice: Forestry Commission Handbook 6. 11th ed. London: Forestry Commission. doi
  59. (1998). From Rio to Kyoto: The Use of Voluntary Agreements to Implement the Climate Change Convention. doi
  60. (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. doi
  61. (2005). Funding for Farm Woodland in England. Forestry Commission. doi
  62. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. United Kingdom: doi
  63. (1995). Growing in Confidence: Understanding People’s Perceptions of Urban Fringe Woodlands. Cheltenham Countryside Commission.
  64. (2006). Growth and Sustainability: Integrating Ecosystem Services into Economics.
  65. (1996). Hotbits: Genuine Random Numbers Generated by Radioactive Decay Available at: http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits.
  66. (1996). Household Willingness to Pay and Farmers' Willingness to Accept Compensation for Establishing Recreational Woodland. doi
  67. (2003). Human Values and their Importance to the Development of Forestry Policy in Britain: A Literature Review. Forestry , doi
  68. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 2nd ed. doi
  69. (2001). Introduction to Environmental Economics. doi
  70. (1994). Introduction: Entering the Field of Qualitative Research, Handbook of Qualitative Research. doi
  71. (1996). Involving Communities in Forestry through Community Participation. Forestry Practice Guide No. 10, Forestry Commission. doi
  72. (2002). Knowledge and Recognition of Ecosystem Services among the General Public in a Drainage Basin in Scania, Southern Sweden . doi
  73. (2001). Land, Rights and the Gift: The Countryside and Rights of Way Act doi
  74. (2006). Local Identification and Valuation doi
  75. (1998). Methods and Applications for Ecosystem Valuation: A Collage. In:
  76. (1994). Methods for Estimating Timber Volume and Value of Pine Trees.
  77. (2003). Missouri River flood of 1993: Role of Woody Corridor Width in Levee Protection. doi
  78. (2003). National Inventory of Woodland and Trees, Great Britain Available at: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/nigreatbritain.pdf/$FILE/nigreatbritain.
  79. (2004). National Vegetation Classification: Field Guide to Woodland. Revised
  80. (2006). Natural England: Strategic Direction 2006-2009. Available at: http://www.englishnature.org.uk/About/pdf/NEStrategyDoc.pdf.
  81. (1996). Natural Woodland. Great Britain: doi
  82. (1997). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. doi
  83. (2005). Need to Know: Social Science Research Methods. doi
  84. (2004). NeighbourWoods for Better Cities-Tools for Developing Multifunctional Community Woodlands
  85. (2004). Open Space and Social Inclusion: Local Woodland Use in Central Scotland. Forestry Commission.
  86. (2000). Our Countryside: The Future. A Fair Deal for Rural England. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
  87. (2005). People & Migration - Archived in Dec
  88. (2001). Perceptions, Attitudes and Preferences in Forest and Woodlands.
  89. (2002). Poplar Rust and it Recent Impact in Great Britain.
  90. (1991). Practical Forestry : For the Agent and Surveyor.
  91. (1994). Practical Forestry : For the Agent and Surveyor. 3rd ed. USA: Alan Sutton.Cranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  92. (2002). Practical Research Methods.
  93. (1991). Price-Size Curves for Broadleaves. Forestry Commission Bulletin. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
  94. (1990). Price-size Curves for Conifers. Forestry Commission Research Information Note 192. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
  95. (2004). Price, Principle and the Environment. United Kingdom: doi
  96. (1995). Prices Received from Mature Poplar at Foxley Estate,
  97. (1994). Provisional Yield Tables for Poplar in Britain. Forestry Commission Technical paper 6. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
  98. (1999). Public Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Nature Conservation in the North York Moors National Park, doi
  99. (1993). Questionnaire Design.
  100. (2002). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers. 2nd ed. doi
  101. (1999). Reciprocal Model for Meeting Ecological and Human Needs in Restoration Projects. doi
  102. (2006). Recreation Use of Urban Forests: An Inter-area Comparison. doi
  103. (2007). Recreation. Available at: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=recreation. Accessed 20 thNovember 2006.Cranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  104. (1986). Recreational Congestion: Some Hypotheses Tested in the Forest of Dean. doi
  105. (2003). Reforesting Scotland: Community woodlands. Available at: http:www.reforestingscotland.gn.apc.org/projects/community_woodlands.php.
  106. (2005). Research Methodology: A Step -by-Step Guide for Beginners. 2nd ed. doi
  107. (1997). Research Randomizer. Available at: http://randomizer.org.
  108. (2005). Researching Real-World Problems: A Guide to Methods of Inquiry. doi
  109. (1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd ed. doi
  110. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 4th ed. doi
  111. (2004). Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. doi
  112. (2004). Social Science in Forestry. Public Participation and Partnerships:Cranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  113. (1985). Sources for the Assessment of British Woodland Change in the Twentieth Century. doi
  114. (2002). Space for Nature: Landscape-scale Action for Woodland Biodiversity. Available at: (www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/policy/publications.htm).
  115. (2004). Space for People: Targeting Action for Woodland Access. Woodland Trust.
  116. (1984). STATISTICA - A General Overview of Features. Available at: http://www.statsoft.com/uniquefeatures/general.html.
  117. (2004). Statistics Explained. 2nd ed. London: Routledge HM Treasury
  118. (2004). Sustainable Forestry :In Brief. Available at: www.forestry.gov.uk/sustainable forestry. doi
  119. (2001). Sustainable Partnership -
  120. (1965). The British Islands and Their Vegetation.
  121. (2006). The Country Code and the Ordering of Countryside Citizenship. doi
  122. (2005). The Development and Application of Bio-economic Modelling for Silvoarable Systems in Europe. PhD thesis,
  123. (2005). The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Values. doi
  124. (2007). The Economic Value of Forests Ecosystems.
  125. (2004). The Economics of the Environment and Natural Resources. United Kingdom: doi
  126. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. UK:
  127. (1999). The Financial Costs of Farm Woodland and Establishment at Four sites
  128. (2001). The Forests Handbook : An Overview of Forest Science.
  129. (2003). The Impact of Silvoarable Agroforestry with Poplar on Farm Profitability and Biological Diversity: Final Report to DEFRA.
  130. (2003). The Landscape Benefits of forests. Forestry Commission.
  131. (1998). The Landscape Value of Farm Woodlands. Forestry Practice Information Note, Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
  132. (2004). The National Community ForestCranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  133. (1997). The Non-use Benefits of Enhancing Forest Biodiversity: A Contingent Ranking Study. doi
  134. (2003). The Policy Context for Biodiversity. In:
  135. (1985). The Public in Your Woods: An Owner's Guide to Managing Urban Fringe Woodland for Recreation.
  136. (2003). The Relationship between Resource Definition and Scale: Considering the Forest. In:
  137. (1999). The Role of Community Forests in Promoting Farm Woodlands.
  138. (1989). The Theory and Application of Forest Economics. doi
  139. (1997). The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. doi
  140. (2002). Tree Cultures: The Place of Trees and Trees in their Places . doi
  141. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. doi
  142. (2000). Urban Forest Landscapes in the UK -ProgressingCranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  143. (1996). Validity in Survey Research . doi
  144. (1988). Wetland Conservation: Economics and Ethics.
  145. (1981). What Constitutes Usable Knowledge in Marco Marketing? doi
  146. (2004). What is Local about Local Environmental Governance? Observations from the Local Biodiversity Action Planning Process. doi
  147. (2003). Woodland for life: The Regional Woodland Strategy for East of England. Available at: http://www.woodlandforlife.net/wfl/documents/woodlandfor_life.pdf. Accessed thFebruary
  148. (1997). Woodland Grant Scheme, Farm Woodland Premium Scheme: Applicant's Pack. Forestry Commission.
  149. (2005). Woodland Owners' Attitudes to Public Access Provision in South-East England. Information Note, Forestry Commission.
  150. (2003). Woodland Wealth Appraisal for the East of England. Available at: http://www.woodlandforlife.net/wfl_woodbank/documents/Full_Rep.pdf.
  151. (1980). Woodlands: A Practical Handbook. Oxfordshire, British Trust for Conservation Volunteers (BTCV).Cranfield University Olivia Agbenyega,
  152. (1981). Yield Models for Forest Management.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.